Reef Central Online Community

Go Back   Reef Central Online Community > General Interest Forums > New to the Hobby
Blogs FAQ Calendar

Notices

User Tag List

Reply
Thread Tools
Unread 07/17/2007, 05:10 PM   #1
Dan9
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Williamsville, NY
Posts: 392
Sump/Fuge

I have a 65g tank with a 29 gallon sump. There are no baffles or anything in the sump. I was wondering if anyone covers the bottom of their sump with sand. It seems like it would be a good place for pods to live and breed. I just have some lr, my skimmer, and my mag7 return pump down there now. I am just trying to do everything possible to maintain a mandarin. I also want to add some macro algae down there. Is the sand a good idea? Thanks


__________________
Dan
Dan9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07/17/2007, 05:12 PM   #2
Dan9
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Williamsville, NY
Posts: 392
I forgot to ask if I should remove the sponge that covers my mag7 intake in order to increase the amount of pods getting into the display. Thanks


__________________
Dan
Dan9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07/17/2007, 09:45 PM   #3
AngeloM3
Registered Member
 
AngeloM3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 1,016
Well without baffles... the water level in the sump will reduce with evaporation. So if you end up putting sand and rocks in there... theres a chance that the water level will expose the rocks and give your living room (or where ever it is) a nice low-tide smell. Also if you have a skimmer in the sump... the fluctuation of the water level will reek havoc with your skimmate production.

Personally I'd remove the sponge on the mag... really no need for it.
And putting sand and rocks and stuff in there is a good idea... but putting baffles is your best bet. That way you can make 1 chamber a fuge and will give a "calm" area for pods to live and reproduce.


__________________
"I'm sick of chasing my dreams. I'm just going to ask them where their going and catch up with them later."
-Mitch Hedberg R.I.P
AngeloM3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07/17/2007, 09:57 PM   #4
Phong33
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 371
Without baffles, I'd be very concerned about sand getting into the return pump and skimmer.


Phong33 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07/17/2007, 09:58 PM   #5
drummereef
Team RC Member
 
drummereef's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: STL
Posts: 14,754
With no baffles, I'd be concerned the return pump would start sucking sand. I personally wouldn't do it, unless you get some baffles in there.


__________________
-Brett

180g Marineland Starfire In-Wall 278 gallon system
drummereef is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07/17/2007, 10:32 PM   #6
beaupierce
Moved On
 
beaupierce's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Nipomo, CA
Posts: 419
Rock too

The sand is a good idea, also some plants and even rock down there will help in the cycling process. I like the palnts especially. Just let mother nature do it's thing and cycle more efficiently.


beaupierce is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07/18/2007, 05:46 AM   #7
BadOleRoss
Registered Member
 
BadOleRoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Lynchburg VA
Posts: 381
I have a 3" sand bed in my 70G sump/refugium. However, my sump does have baffles and there is no way the sand is getting anywhere near my pump.


BadOleRoss is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:48 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Powered by Searchlight © 2025 Axivo Inc.
Use of this web site is subject to the terms and conditions described in the user agreement.
Reef CentralTM Reef Central, LLC. Copyright ©1999-2022
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.