Reef Central Online Community

Go Back   Reef Central Online Community > General Interest Forums > Reef Discussion
Blogs FAQ Calendar

Notices

User Tag List

Reply
Thread Tools
Unread 10/07/2007, 06:46 PM   #1
Deatherent
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Indianapolis, in
Posts: 5
Upsize to failure

I recently moved from a 55 galon reef to a 75 gallon reef. Sounds simple enough doen't it.

I took everything out of the 55 including the water and reassembled it into the 75 adding 60 pounds of live rock purchased out of a tank being moved out of state so i know it was good rock.

I hand mixed the water addition and carfully checked to make sure my salenity was around 1.028.

Now the problem. My corrals don't open my new snales have not moved from where they were dropped into the tank.

It has been 2 months since the move and it is not looking good and I am not sure what I am doing wrong.

I have a 20 high that I do nothing to other than top offs and it is glorious.

HELP


Deatherent is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10/07/2007, 06:50 PM   #2
flyyyguy
King of the white corals
 
flyyyguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,239
1.028 is a little high...especially if you are getting that reading with a hydrometer or a improperly calibrated refractometer and it is actually higher than that. In times of stress it is better to be a little lower than higher.

the ocean is at .026 more or less, why would you want to be any higher than that??

I would also maybe do a test for copper on the new tank. Just to make sure that isnt an issue.

Did you move a sandbed too?? Is there a chance that you have/have had levels of ammonia nad nitrIte due to a cycle of some kind??


__________________
I like holding hands, snuggling, and long walks on the beach
flyyyguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10/07/2007, 07:19 PM   #3
REEF-n-Chicago
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Los Angeles, CA (san pedro)
Posts: 1,456
Agreed on the high level of salinity.... My only thought was the sand bed or copper as well? Hmmmm ! Let us know?


__________________
Jordan

My tank gets DRUNK every morning

Current Tank Info: 150 Gallon w/ 100 gallon sump; 240 gallon
REEF-n-Chicago is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10/07/2007, 07:51 PM   #4
Deatherent
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Indianapolis, in
Posts: 5
Ok agreed but everyone I talk to gives me a different level I should be keeping my salinaty at. I will lower it ASAP.

I did move my sand bed but I have checked my ammonia levels and they are at 0. I do think my Nitrites are high because I am getting a spike in hair algea and I am not sure the best way to get it down.

Tested for copper and got a negative reading and also tested my PH which is around 8.2 which I think is a little low.

Any and all help is very much appreciated


__________________
"Life's Journey is not to arrive at the Grave safely in a well preserverd body, but rather to skid in sideways totally worn out shouting HOLY CRAP WHAT A RIDE!!!

Current Tank Info: 75 and 25 and 12
Deatherent is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10/07/2007, 08:12 PM   #5
TitusvileSurfer
Registered Member
 
TitusvileSurfer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Titusville, FL
Posts: 3,227
What about nitrate? You obviously have a cycled tank and you nitrite should be 0 by default with your ammonia, but nitrate is a little different.


__________________
The ocean is the pinnacle of reef tanks. Someone up there is keeping up with his PH and Phosphates to.
TitusvileSurfer is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10/07/2007, 08:14 PM   #6
SlowCobra
Registered Member
 
SlowCobra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Joliet, IL
Posts: 3,079
No matter who you talk to, if they suggest anything over 1.026 stop listening immediately. The salinity range should be between 1.021 and 1.026. Usually most people strive for around .023 - .026 unless putting a fish through hyposalinity for treatment of ich.


SlowCobra is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10/07/2007, 08:24 PM   #7
Paulairduck
I LOVE FREE FRAGS!!!
 
Paulairduck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Chino Hills
Posts: 2,909
THE dead sea


Paulairduck is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10/07/2007, 08:31 PM   #8
Deatherent
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Indianapolis, in
Posts: 5
You are correct nitrite @ or below 0 and nitrate spiking.


__________________
"Life's Journey is not to arrive at the Grave safely in a well preserverd body, but rather to skid in sideways totally worn out shouting HOLY CRAP WHAT A RIDE!!!

Current Tank Info: 75 and 25 and 12
Deatherent is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10/08/2007, 06:04 AM   #9
dendro982
Registered Member
 
dendro982's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,963
If you kept thanks for 18 years at 1.028, and the 20g high is OK - this shouldn't be a cause of changes. Although I'm keeping 1.026

If the 75g tank wasn't used for medications, and the rock was cycled, with no ammonia after addition - everything should be OK, I do that all the time. Only adding Seachem Stability (bacteria), just in case, and testing every day for a several days.

In unknown cases, I would do cleaning, water change, fresh carbon, changed every 2 days for a week, grounding probe, check an oxygen or just oxygenate a little more. Maybe Kent's Toxic Metals sponge for a short time.

When you will solve this situation, and will have more time - can you post more about 20g, that needs only top-off?
I would like to go this route too.


dendro982 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10/08/2007, 07:31 AM   #10
davidryder
Claris or Elliot?
 
davidryder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Nightopia
Posts: 2,750
It's been two months and you are having the same problem?

8.2 isn't on the low side at all IMO


__________________
A rolling stone gathers no moss...

Current Tank Info: 90g mixed reef, corner overflow (Mag 9.5), 25g refugium (Mag 5), 15g refugium, Orbit 260w pc, Pan World 50PX-X (Closed loop), AquaC EV-120 (now skimmerless)
davidryder is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10/08/2007, 08:42 AM   #11
akaatomic
Registered Member
 
akaatomic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: NJ
Posts: 155
How long had the 55 been up for? Your sand bed could've gone toxic. If you've kept the salinity, PH, temp, lights, etc... then your results should be similar. The only two biological changes that you've made are stirring up your sand and adding new rock. Are you running carbon right now? Get back to the basics. I would take out the new rock, do a large water change and run some carbon for two weeks and see how things look. If things don't get better I'd say it's your sand. If they do, slowly add the rock back in and watch for deterioration. Worst case you need to replace your sand. Do some searching on sand beds. I've read everything from sand beds only last a few years to never touch your sand bed.


akaatomic is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10/08/2007, 08:56 AM   #12
Craig Lambert
Premium Member
 
Craig Lambert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 2,897
I agree that the likely problem is the sandbed. When you moved it the different layers became mixed and released material that was toxic to your inhabitants.


__________________
"Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day. Teach a man to fish and he will spend all day in a boat drinking beer."

Current Tank Info: 75G Tank, 29G Sump, 100lbs LR, AquaC EV-180, Iwaki MD-20RT return Tunze nano streams 4X54 t-5/Icecap Ballast & SLR's 2x110 vho actinic
Craig Lambert is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10/08/2007, 09:14 AM   #13
TitusvileSurfer
Registered Member
 
TitusvileSurfer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Titusville, FL
Posts: 3,227
The sand sounds logical to me. You should test for phosphates, if a test shows off the chart quantities then there you have it.


__________________
The ocean is the pinnacle of reef tanks. Someone up there is keeping up with his PH and Phosphates to.
TitusvileSurfer is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10/08/2007, 11:17 AM   #14
davidryder
Claris or Elliot?
 
davidryder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Nightopia
Posts: 2,750
But two months?? I could understand having a problem for a couple of weeks but two months is far long enough for any sandbed/cycle problem to subside.


__________________
A rolling stone gathers no moss...

Current Tank Info: 90g mixed reef, corner overflow (Mag 9.5), 25g refugium (Mag 5), 15g refugium, Orbit 260w pc, Pan World 50PX-X (Closed loop), AquaC EV-120 (now skimmerless)
davidryder is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10/08/2007, 11:43 AM   #15
samtheman
Moved On
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 605
If it was the sandbed, the problem would be over after two months. If it did continue for that long, it would be noticalbe in the test readings. I'll bet on something else. How was the lighting changed? Or some other factor like temp. differences between the two tanks.
We don't know many of the tank paramaters except salinity was high.


samtheman is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10/08/2007, 05:17 PM   #16
TitusvileSurfer
Registered Member
 
TitusvileSurfer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Titusville, FL
Posts: 3,227
He said he had high nitrates as well. Phosphate was never checked to my knowledge. He could have copper stored in the silicone of his 'new' tank, but I doubt it. I wonder if there is a dead fish stuck under a rock tucked away out of sight and out of reach causing high ammonia, which is eaten...high nitrite, which is eaten...and high nitrate, which makes his corals close and snails die. Of course if the snails haven't moved in two months, they are possibly contributing greatly to the nitrate problem.


__________________
The ocean is the pinnacle of reef tanks. Someone up there is keeping up with his PH and Phosphates to.

Last edited by TitusvileSurfer; 10/08/2007 at 05:22 PM.
TitusvileSurfer is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10/08/2007, 06:22 PM   #17
Skier1
Registered Member
 
Skier1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 112
Salinity levels

Quote:
Ok agreed but everyone I talk to gives me a different level I should be keeping my salinaty at.
Personally, Randy Holmes-Farley is very respected here and wrote this article in Reefkeeping on water salinity:

http://reefkeeping.com/issues/2007-03/rhf/index.php

His recommendation of 1.0264 seems very well-reasoned to me.


Skier1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:32 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Powered by Searchlight © 2025 Axivo Inc.
Use of this web site is subject to the terms and conditions described in the user agreement.
Reef CentralTM Reef Central, LLC. Copyright ©1999-2022
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.