Reef Central Online Community

Go Back   Reef Central Online Community > General Interest Forums > New to the Hobby
Blogs FAQ Calendar

Notices

User Tag List

Reply
Thread Tools
Unread 02/06/2008, 12:17 PM   #1
kenyacat
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 273
Need some live rock help

I am researching live rock.

My LFS (a) has some baserock he calls moonrock that I plan on getting for the base. He also has some dense looking rock in his tanks that he sells as live rock. I have seen antipasia on them.

LFS (b) has some figi live rock. Much more porous with small to large holes. Much nicer looking too.

This is for a 55 gallon tank with fish and corals (at least someday).

Which would be better the figi rock or denser live rock? Figi probably doesn't weigh as much. How do I get to my 55 lbs per gallon if figi is so light?

Thanks


kenyacat is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02/06/2008, 12:20 PM   #2
phenom5
Unregistered Member
 
phenom5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Arizona
Posts: 5,096
Well, you want less dense more porous rock for your live rock. Less dense, lighter rock=bigger rocks/ more rock per pound, so it's actually more cost effective. GL


__________________
Rob

Current Tank Info: DSA 155 Pro | ATI Sunpower | ATB 840 v2 | Apex | Wav
phenom5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02/06/2008, 12:26 PM   #3
dileggi
Premium Member
 
dileggi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: S. Philly PA
Posts: 1,171
I agree, more porous and less dense is the way to go. As you mentioned, it will take more rock to hit the 1.5-2 lbs of rock per gallon. I have a much smaller tank, but I used a combo of figi and some tonga branch. You want porous, but you also want to get what you like as well.

Most likely, when you're done with the rock, it will probably cover most of the back wall of the tank, depending on how you aquascape.


__________________
Eric


"The greatest trick the Devil ever pulled, was convincing the world he didn't exist." - Usual Suspects

Current Tank Info: 90g w/30g sump; skimmer; 2x175w MH & 2x super white actinic...3g w/.5g fuge 1x150w MH Viper
dileggi is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02/06/2008, 12:46 PM   #4
jehudson
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: San Antonio Tx
Posts: 28
More porus rock is better for your tank. More surface area for good bacteria.


jehudson is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02/06/2008, 01:02 PM   #5
kenyacat
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 273
So I want to go with figi. Good I like that better anyway. Looks a lot more interesting than a slab of rock the other LFS sells as live.

"Most likely, when you're done with the rock, it will probably cover most of the back wall of the tank, depending on how you aquascape." -- messed up the quote thing.

Anyway do I need to worry about flow along the back wall or can I just stack against the glass and forget about it?

Thanks.


kenyacat is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:57 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Powered by Searchlight © 2025 Axivo Inc.
Use of this web site is subject to the terms and conditions described in the user agreement.
Reef CentralTM Reef Central, LLC. Copyright ©1999-2022
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.