Reef Central Online Community

Go Back   Reef Central Online Community > General Interest Forums > Lighting, Filtration & Other Equipment
Blogs FAQ Calendar

Notices

User Tag List

Reply
Thread Tools
Unread 03/23/2008, 09:27 PM   #1
Robgixxer
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Pompano Beach, Fl
Posts: 315
Precision Marine Reverse Flow Substrate Reactors?

Anyone here ever use them? I was thinking of getting a few of them. One for carbon, one for phosphate, and one for nitrate filtration. and also if i were to do this would it be a good idea to pipe them together in series, or better to have each one stand alone? If i decided to do this and was gonna do them individually with seperate pumps, i was gonna program them on the aquacontroller to only come on as needed somehow if it is possible or just set them for like a couple of days a week. What are your thoughts on this process, pros, cons, or whatever the case maybe. Thanks guys....


Robgixxer is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03/23/2008, 09:34 PM   #2
Robgixxer
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Pompano Beach, Fl
Posts: 315
please help...... info would be greatly appreciated..


Robgixxer is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03/23/2008, 09:40 PM   #3
Robgixxer
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Pompano Beach, Fl
Posts: 315
Also they will be on a 150 gallon tank with 30 gallon sump. they make two sizes. should i use the smaller or larger or combination depending on the media used? and what size pumps should i use through each medias?


Robgixxer is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03/23/2008, 10:03 PM   #4
Robgixxer
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Pompano Beach, Fl
Posts: 315
how come i can never get anyone to respond in my threads? i get plenty of views just no help!


Robgixxer is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03/24/2008, 08:53 AM   #5
ddevlin
Registered Member
 
ddevlin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 472
Quote:
Originally posted by Robgixxer
how come i can never get anyone to respond in my threads? i get plenty of views just no help!
I don't think that many people are using them. I have been watching your thread to get info myself. I want to run ROWAphos on my 210 and I don't know if I need the 26" one or not. I have heard a lot of good things about the GEO media reactor. it cost a little more though.


ddevlin is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03/24/2008, 10:56 AM   #6
mr. pluto
Registered Member
 
mr. pluto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: bay area
Posts: 1,191
i have the taller one :




i have the 1046 for recirculation , the 1048 would be better imo.


hth


mr. pluto is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03/24/2008, 03:56 PM   #7
RCBrooke
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Lee Center, NY
Posts: 211
I've been running mine for phosphate removal a while now. I stopped to try three of the other name brands, I'll skip saying which one's but just look at any online retailer for the major brands. I just started using it again ---

Much nicer than anything else in my opinion. I think It's got a reversed from normal seal as I keep tightening it when I'm trying to loosen it. Seals great and fluidizes at a pretty low flow . I use a MJ600. Be sure to use the foam filter for the feed pump as the foam in the bottom of the canister is a pain to clean.

I can run 2 cups of GFO for over a month with this set up.

Highly recommended.

Randy


RCBrooke is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03/24/2008, 03:58 PM   #8
RCBrooke
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Lee Center, NY
Posts: 211
Mr. Pluto, are you running yours as a sulfur denitrater?

Randy.


RCBrooke is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03/24/2008, 09:53 PM   #9
Robgixxer
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Pompano Beach, Fl
Posts: 315
sweet! see i was trying to find out which way was best because i'm trying to build a new complete system. and i want to be able to service everything as easy as possible so i think i'm just gonna go with everything in it's own stand alone setup. 1 pump for each piece of equipment pretty much. that way if i have to do any work on a peticular section i don't have to mess with the others or shut them down....... does this make sense? I have a Mag 18 for the recirculation of the system, also inline with this is a 25watt gamma sterilzer. I also have a 8 watt gamma sterilizer from my old 55 gal. that i now use in its own close loop on the fuge. obviously the AquaC 180 is overdriven with a mag 9.5, The Korallin Calcium Reactor has it's own eheim. And the three precision marine canisters that i was gonna order were gonna just have their own individual mag 150 gph pumps on them.


Robgixxer is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03/24/2008, 10:26 PM   #10
mr. pluto
Registered Member
 
mr. pluto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: bay area
Posts: 1,191
RCBrooke
Quote:
Mr. Pluto, are you running yours as a sulfur denitrater?
yes it was, but it did it's job so now it sits in the retired section
i do have the 2 little fishes reactors i am using for gfo but i really do not want to open this reactor to clean out the media quite yet.
it is really robust compared to the phosban ones though.

Robgixxer, would it be easier if you tried 1 pump with a shut off valve for ea. media reactor?



Last edited by mr. pluto; 03/24/2008 at 10:54 PM.
mr. pluto is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03/24/2008, 10:34 PM   #11
Robgixxer
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Pompano Beach, Fl
Posts: 315
cool. I'm just trying to get all the info i can. my last tank was mostly fish, with a sabae anemone, a condy, piece of brain coral and some hammer. nothing to wild. but this time i want to try to get into more of a reef type tank with some sps corals too


Robgixxer is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03/25/2008, 10:36 PM   #12
Psyire
Premium Member
 
Psyire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 1,870
Who sells these?


Psyire is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03/26/2008, 06:21 AM   #13
RCBrooke
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Lee Center, NY
Posts: 211
Try their web site for seconds, dealers around the country, or online dealers. http://www.precisionmarine.com/html/dealer_locator.html .
Not all listed online dealers seem to actually have the reverse substate reactors.

Randy


RCBrooke is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03/26/2008, 06:28 AM   #14
Paul_PSU
Moved On
 
Paul_PSU's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Pittsburgh, PA.
Posts: 1,512
You can run the carbon and the phosphate remover in a series on the same pump, but not the sulphur denitrator. You should keep everyone separate as you will change the carbon and phosphate out at different intervals. The denitrator has to have very slow water flow through it. I have two of the "phosban" reactors running together with Phosar in the first and carbon in the second before it empties back into the sump. I have a denitrator running on its own pump.

Here are the reverse flow reactors I have. best price:
http://www.drsfostersmith.com/produc...m?pcatid=11586

Paul


Paul_PSU is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03/31/2008, 10:26 PM   #15
Robgixxer
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Pompano Beach, Fl
Posts: 315
Quote:
Originally posted by Paul_PSU
You can run the carbon and the phosphate remover in a series on the same pump, but not the sulphur denitrator. You should keep everyone separate as you will change the carbon and phosphate out at different intervals. The denitrator has to have very slow water flow through it. I have two of the "phosban" reactors running together with Phosar in the first and carbon in the second before it empties back into the sump. I have a denitrator running on its own pump.

Here are the reverse flow reactors I have. best price:
http://www.drsfostersmith.com/produc...m?pcatid=11586

Paul
ok so say i was running 3 of these bad boys, 1 for carbon, 1 for phosphates, and for for nitrates, what would be the correct size gph pumps to put on them as to not do it wong?


Robgixxer is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04/01/2008, 06:29 AM   #16
sjm817
On Yer left!
 
sjm817's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 18,777
Quote:
Originally posted by Paul_PSU
I have two of the "phosban" reactors running together with Phosar in the first and carbon in the second before it empties back into the sump. [/url]

Paul
I think you would be better off with carbon 1st, then GFO.


sjm817 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04/01/2008, 01:36 PM   #17
RCBrooke
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Lee Center, NY
Posts: 211
On my small size reactor I run a MJ600 with the MJ foam added on the intake. I get a month and a half before cleaning becomes necessary.

If I remember correctly the recommended flow is 150 gph.

Randy


RCBrooke is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04/03/2008, 09:14 PM   #18
Robgixxer
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Pompano Beach, Fl
Posts: 315
Quote:
Originally posted by RCBrooke
On my small size reactor I run a MJ600 with the MJ foam added on the intake. I get a month and a half before cleaning becomes necessary.

If I remember correctly the recommended flow is 150 gph.

Randy
cool thanks! i think i'm gonna give them a try. I'll do one first to see how i like it. now also one more question when i hook them up should i put the put in the sump section of he fuge and the return line go to the skimmer compartment or should i return it back to the same spot. or is this like a trial and error thing to see what i like or what works best? thanks for the help.


Robgixxer is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04/04/2008, 06:56 AM   #19
RCBrooke
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Lee Center, NY
Posts: 211
Not sure on the best setup. I only had room to put the whole setup in the pump section of my sump.

Randy


RCBrooke is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04/04/2008, 08:24 AM   #20
Paul_PSU
Moved On
 
Paul_PSU's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Pittsburgh, PA.
Posts: 1,512
150gph is way too fast for GFO. You just want to have the media tumbling in the reactor so it doesn't bind. 150 might be ok for carbon, but the GFO will break apart if the flow is too high. I have mine set for 40gph and have seen some that keep it at 20-30. I have mine hanging on the side of the sump. The feed pump is in the skimmer section and the reactors empty in the return section.

sjm817, I agree. I have to switch mine around when I change the media out next week.


Paul_PSU is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04/04/2008, 01:40 PM   #21
RCBrooke
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Lee Center, NY
Posts: 211
Can't say as I've noticed any breaking apart or the level in the reactor shrinking. Now on the AquaC XP reactor 150 gph did blow the top off and tumbled/spilled the GFO like crazy. I couldn't even use a MJ400 (about 100 gph) to power the AquaC without it leaking.

Randy


RCBrooke is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04/05/2008, 07:10 AM   #22
Robgixxer
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Pompano Beach, Fl
Posts: 315
hmm, ok i was thinking of getting some mag 1.5's to run these things. cuase it looks like they have adjustable flow controls. but if you say the phosphate one should be turned way down low i will try something smaller for that. i think that i am gonna try them setup the way i have the loop runnuing on my sterilizer. from the return sump back to the skimmer compartment, and see what happens.


Robgixxer is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:00 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Powered by Searchlight © 2025 Axivo Inc.
Use of this web site is subject to the terms and conditions described in the user agreement.
Reef CentralTM Reef Central, LLC. Copyright ©1999-2022
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.