Reef Central Online Community

Go Back   Reef Central Online Community > General Interest Forums > New to the Hobby
Blogs FAQ Calendar

Notices

User Tag List

Reply
Thread Tools
Unread 05/25/2008, 07:13 PM   #1
jjj1100
Registered Member
 
jjj1100's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 482
Your Results with Hyposalinity

Hello,

I was doing alot of research on Hyposalinity, and the disease forum on reefcentral seem to think it works very well. Howevery on Wet Web Meida, they think copper is a much better treatment and don't think highly of hypo as a cure.

I was under the impression that hypo was a safer, and more effect way, and decided to try that method as I came down with an outbreak of ich.

I am just curious as to everyones results with hypo as a cure for ich. Right now I am at 1.10, and plan to keep it there for 6 weeks.

Thanks


jjj1100 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05/25/2008, 07:26 PM   #2
izzy_real
Registered Member
 
izzy_real's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Bristol, TN
Posts: 172
Hypo-salinity is a good option IF you have a fish only system, OR if you actually have the infected specimens quarantined in another tank.

However, if you have a good heater and an accurate thermometer, hyper-temperature (84F) will speed ich through it's life cycle quicker, and with less side effects than copper. Keep a close eye on the temp and the animals you're treating. As I'm sure you know, higher water temps include lower dissolved oxygen levels. Tell-Tell signs include heavy breathing, gasping at the top of the water as if they're trying to breath air, etc.

If the affected animals are in a small enough tank to do daily 25% water changes, the combination of hyper temp and said changes will help expedite the ich and it's eggs from the tank. Keep them quarantined for at least two weeks before you reintroduce them to the main system, even if they show no signs of the illness.

Good luck JJ, and as I'm sure you've found since begining this hobby, there are 1,000 methods to treating all things marine.

I hope I've helped you in at least some way!

Izzy


__________________
Love, Peace, and Hair Grease!

Current Tank Info: 280 Gallon Acrylic vat/tank, MRC 3R Skimmer, 1000 watts of light, canopy on winch and pulleys, 80 Gallon reef sump, fuge, and alot of work!
izzy_real is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05/25/2008, 08:07 PM   #3
jjj1100
Registered Member
 
jjj1100's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 482
Thanks for the quick reply.
Yeah I pulled all the inverts from the system, and dropped the salinity in the display. I am hoping I don't have to catch the fish, and set up another tank to do the copper treatment as i won't do that in the display.

Keeping my fingers crossed for the hypo


jjj1100 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05/25/2008, 08:09 PM   #4
ahullsb
Registered Member
 
ahullsb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: sacramento, ca
Posts: 2,729
I treated 5 fish for ich using hypo last year. I have never seen a trace of it since. I've read that certain fish do not tolerate copper very well. Although either should work. Even though it isn't much of a difference, I would try to keep the salinity at 1.009


__________________
Andy

Sacramento, CA

Current Tank Info: 55 gallon reef w/20 gallon sump/ER135/ 75 pounds of live rock, 4 in sandbed, 2 b&w ocellaris clowns, yellow watchman/pistol, rosy scaled wrasse, Mystery wrasse, Copperbanded Butterfly, Lighting 48" outer orbit 2 150 mh/ 4 t5 actinics
ahullsb is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05/25/2008, 08:09 PM   #5
izzy_real
Registered Member
 
izzy_real's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Bristol, TN
Posts: 172
You could hit it from both ends. Hypo salinity, and hyper temp.

If you wish.

How large is your tank?


__________________
Love, Peace, and Hair Grease!

Current Tank Info: 280 Gallon Acrylic vat/tank, MRC 3R Skimmer, 1000 watts of light, canopy on winch and pulleys, 80 Gallon reef sump, fuge, and alot of work!
izzy_real is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05/25/2008, 08:11 PM   #6
izzy_real
Registered Member
 
izzy_real's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Bristol, TN
Posts: 172
1.009 is rather low. that's lower than brackish. I wouldn't go less than 1.017.

izzy


__________________
Love, Peace, and Hair Grease!

Current Tank Info: 280 Gallon Acrylic vat/tank, MRC 3R Skimmer, 1000 watts of light, canopy on winch and pulleys, 80 Gallon reef sump, fuge, and alot of work!
izzy_real is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05/25/2008, 08:12 PM   #7
jjj1100
Registered Member
 
jjj1100's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 482
its a 300 gallon display, 40 gallon sump, and 120 gallon refugium. I was fortnate that I could let the fuge run stand alone (its in a different room), and moved all the inverts there for 6 weeks so that is running fine for the time being.

ahull, even though I am using a refractometer, I don't know that I feel safe going to .009...just in case of error somehow


jjj1100 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05/25/2008, 08:15 PM   #8
ACBlinky
Premium Member
 
ACBlinky's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Peterborough, ON, Canada
Posts: 4,954
Blog Entries: 20
Quote:
Originally posted by izzy_real
1.009 is rather low. that's lower than brackish. I wouldn't go less than 1.017.

izzy
Standard SG for hyposalinity treatment is 1.009.

IME hypo works VERY well, providing fish are kept at 1.009 for six weeks, not including the days it takes to bring down and raise the SG at the start and end of treatment. It's also a good idea to keep the fish in QT for a week after you've raised the SG back up to normal -- this gives you a chance to observe their health and ensure that the parasite is completely gone.


__________________
"The cure for anything is salt water: sweat, tears, or the sea."
- Isak Dinesen

Current Tank Info: 150g mixed reef, 30g sump/refugium, LED lighting, 100lbs LR, coral beauty, flame angel, blue & yellow tangs, gobies, damsels, 6-line wrasse, lawnmower blenny, dottyback, clown pair, rabbitfish, shrimp, crabs, CUC.
ACBlinky is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05/25/2008, 08:16 PM   #9
izzy_real
Registered Member
 
izzy_real's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Bristol, TN
Posts: 172
1.009 is a new one on me. I've not had any experience keeping it that low. I'll take your word on it.

izzy


__________________
Love, Peace, and Hair Grease!

Current Tank Info: 280 Gallon Acrylic vat/tank, MRC 3R Skimmer, 1000 watts of light, canopy on winch and pulleys, 80 Gallon reef sump, fuge, and alot of work!
izzy_real is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05/25/2008, 08:29 PM   #10
Aquarist007
Registered Member
 
Aquarist007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Hamilton, Canada
Posts: 28,240
Blog Entries: 1
Quote:
Originally posted by izzy_real
1.009 is a new one on me. I've not had any experience keeping it that low. I'll take your word on it.

izzy
that is the quoted salinity rate for hyosalination 1.009.

http://www.petsforum.com/personal/tr...osalinity.html


__________________
I prefer my substrates stirred but not shaken

Current Tank Info: 150gal long mixed reef, 90gal sump, 60 gal refugium with 200 lbs live rock
Aquarist007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05/25/2008, 08:30 PM   #11
izzy_real
Registered Member
 
izzy_real's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Bristol, TN
Posts: 172
Thanks for the link capn. I was actually about to look that up, just to double check.

izzy


__________________
Love, Peace, and Hair Grease!

Current Tank Info: 280 Gallon Acrylic vat/tank, MRC 3R Skimmer, 1000 watts of light, canopy on winch and pulleys, 80 Gallon reef sump, fuge, and alot of work!
izzy_real is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05/25/2008, 08:35 PM   #12
Aquarist007
Registered Member
 
Aquarist007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Hamilton, Canada
Posts: 28,240
Blog Entries: 1
there are three methods quoted for getting rid of ich. All use a quarantine tank

hyposalination

use of copper based medications

series of complete water changes that correspond to the life cyle of ich


__________________
I prefer my substrates stirred but not shaken

Current Tank Info: 150gal long mixed reef, 90gal sump, 60 gal refugium with 200 lbs live rock
Aquarist007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05/25/2008, 08:51 PM   #13
rjsilvers
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 537
I had a Coral Beauty with a pretty bad case of ich as soon as I brought her home and QTed her...

Dropped the SG to 1.009 and I haven't seen any signs of ich in 3 weeks and she's doing fine and eating great.


rjsilvers is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05/25/2008, 08:55 PM   #14
Aquarist007
Registered Member
 
Aquarist007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Hamilton, Canada
Posts: 28,240
Blog Entries: 1
Quote:
Originally posted by rjsilvers
I had a Coral Beauty with a pretty bad case of ich as soon as I brought her home and QTed her...

Dropped the SG to 1.009 and I haven't seen any signs of ich in 3 weeks and she's doing fine and eating great.
great but keep her in there for the full six weeks


__________________
I prefer my substrates stirred but not shaken

Current Tank Info: 150gal long mixed reef, 90gal sump, 60 gal refugium with 200 lbs live rock
Aquarist007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05/25/2008, 09:15 PM   #15
tmz
ReefKeeping Mag staff

 
tmz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: West Seneca NY
Posts: 27,691
I do not think elevating the temperature to 84 plus is a good idea. This may or may not quicken the life cycle of marine ich but it will definately increase the metabolism of the fish at a time when the fih needs to conserve energy to fight off the infestation and secondary infections.
I prefer copper over hyposalinity and have had more sucess with it. . Hyposalinity takes a relatively long time and in my experience is not always sucessful. I have tried it several timesand the ich returned. I don't think the negative effects of long term 8 weeks or more to hyposalinity are fully understood. The kidneys will work less for one thing . Anyway ,two months in an environment the fish has not evolved too just seems less desireable than copper or the tank transfer method for copper safe fish..


__________________
Tom

Current Tank Info: Tank of the Month , November 2011 : 600gal integrated system: 3 display tanks (120 g, 90g, 89g),several frag/grow out tanks, macroalgae refugia, cryptic zones. 40+ fish, seahorses, sps,lps,leathers, zoanthidae and non photosynthetic corals.
tmz is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05/25/2008, 09:56 PM   #16
Jerry W
Registered Member
 
Jerry W's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: PA.
Posts: 2,873
Raising the temperature merely accelerates the life cycle of c. irritans. It will not kill it off. I personally would not raise the temp past 82. Hypo is safe and in most cases reliable. You must have an accurate measuring device (refractometer or lab grade glass hydrometer calibrated to reef temps.) You also need to carefully monitor pH as it will drop in lower salinities. There have also been some strains of crypt that are resistant to the procedure. A sg of 1.009 or salinity of 14 ppt is suggested. If this strays north, it can render the treatment ineffective. It's not a complicated procedure but it must be done with patience and diligence to parameters.


__________________
Americans sleep peacefully in their beds at night because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.

Current Tank Info: 37 gal; pair of mocha clowns, ywg and tiger pistol shrimp
Jerry W is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05/25/2008, 10:58 PM   #17
tmz
ReefKeeping Mag staff

 
tmz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: West Seneca NY
Posts: 27,691
If it strays south it will kill the fish which has an internal salinity of about 1.008.( cutting it close at 1.009, shich I realize if the mainstream recommended level)) While the fish can osmoregulate by drinking to remain hydrated in waters with sg higher than it's internal salinity. I don't think it has a way of preventing overhydration from prolonged exposure to sg lower than it's internal level.


__________________
Tom

Current Tank Info: Tank of the Month , November 2011 : 600gal integrated system: 3 display tanks (120 g, 90g, 89g),several frag/grow out tanks, macroalgae refugia, cryptic zones. 40+ fish, seahorses, sps,lps,leathers, zoanthidae and non photosynthetic corals.
tmz is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05/25/2008, 11:02 PM   #18
Aquarist007
Registered Member
 
Aquarist007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Hamilton, Canada
Posts: 28,240
Blog Entries: 1
Quote:
Originally posted by tmz
If it strays south it will kill the fish which has an internal salinity of about 1.008.( cutting it close at 1.009, shich I realize if the mainstream recommended level)) While the fish can osmoregulate by drinking to remain hydrated in waters with sg higher than it's internal salinity. I don't think it has a way of preventing overhydration from prolonged exposure to sg lower than it's internal level.
that is why the suggestion of not doing this without a refractometer is a good one


__________________
I prefer my substrates stirred but not shaken

Current Tank Info: 150gal long mixed reef, 90gal sump, 60 gal refugium with 200 lbs live rock
Aquarist007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05/26/2008, 02:04 AM   #19
NanoGurl
Moved On
 
NanoGurl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Earth
Posts: 4,306
I have used hypo at 1.009 and it worked very well. I kept the temps a bit warm and dropped the salinity over a few days.. kept it there for 8 weeks and then much slower brought the salinity back up and no problems at all. This was used on a Powder Brown Tang with success.


NanoGurl is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05/26/2008, 10:34 AM   #20
tmz
ReefKeeping Mag staff

 
tmz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: West Seneca NY
Posts: 27,691
Yes, Ive heard of many sucesses , my experience, however, on two occassions was that the ich returned as soon as the salinity went back over the 1.021 after the full 6weeks at 1.009 and a week coming up.


__________________
Tom

Current Tank Info: Tank of the Month , November 2011 : 600gal integrated system: 3 display tanks (120 g, 90g, 89g),several frag/grow out tanks, macroalgae refugia, cryptic zones. 40+ fish, seahorses, sps,lps,leathers, zoanthidae and non photosynthetic corals.
tmz is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:30 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Powered by Searchlight © 2025 Axivo Inc.
Use of this web site is subject to the terms and conditions described in the user agreement.
Reef CentralTM Reef Central, LLC. Copyright ©1999-2022
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.