|
09/14/2008, 01:41 PM | #1 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Western PA
Posts: 986
|
miracle mud or sand in refugium
Which is better and why?
|
09/14/2008, 02:03 PM | #2 |
Moved On
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: 39°N, -108°W AKA Somewhere in Colorado
Posts: 578
|
i started with miracle mud in my refugium...i think alot of people run them without any kinda of substrate though...
|
09/14/2008, 02:11 PM | #3 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Goodyear, AZ
Posts: 513
|
Mud is reported to have the additional benefit of trace element support as well as denitrification.
__________________
Edge you mah cating myself Check out my gallery if you desire. Current Tank Info: 50 gallon mix of soft, LPS and SPS, two croceas, two maximas, a few fish, turf filter with skimmer, MH and PC lighting, chiller, Calcium Reactor and wave2k. |
09/14/2008, 02:11 PM | #4 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Marianna, FL
Posts: 201
|
I ran miracle mud for 3 months before coverting to live sand in my refugium. I reworked my refugium this past week, this is when I converted over to live sand. I think if I remember correctly you will have to replace you miracle mud after some time, where live sand you shouldn't have to replace.
__________________
Looks like I picked the wrong week to stop drinking coffee..... Current Tank Info: 150 gallon, 3-150w MH, 4 96w Actinic, 4 Lunar Blue Moon Glow LEDs, Aquac EV180 skimmer w/ mag7, Mag18 return pump, 3 #4 Koralia, 250# LR, 3" Live Sand Bed, 55 G sump/fuge |
09/14/2008, 02:16 PM | #5 |
im an addict lol
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Land o lakes, FLorida
Posts: 12,930
|
started with miracle mud. I can't say if it was any better then the live sand but I did have no nitrates!!! it is just so exspensive and you have to replace 1/2 every 6 months
Roger
__________________
Goal levels: salinity 35ppt, temp 78-79, alk 8-9, cal 430-450, mag 1310-1400 po4 .03, no3 1-3 Current Tank Info: System 1... 100 gal Zoa tank I built, 30 gal Ric Yuma shroom tank, 30 gal mix tank my sons,40 gal softie tank, 40 gal nem tank, two 40 gal LPS tank. System 2... 240 gal SPS display attached 100 gal frag SPS only tank. |
09/14/2008, 06:29 PM | #6 |
Premium Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 3,858
|
Neither. A bare bottom with a little live rock rubble works great for me.
__________________
"You can't learn this hobby one question at a time." (Mr. Tuskfish) Eileen Current Tank Info: I'm out of the hobby, but used to have a60 gal. reef, refugium in sump, Internal Mag 9 return, SC 302 skimmer, two Maxi-Jet 1200's modded, four bulb T5 Lighting, Reefkeeper Lite Controller with three PC4's, Little Fishes GFO reactor. |
09/14/2008, 06:38 PM | #7 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Niantic, CT
Posts: 425
|
Both work fine. The sand is cheaper, though. Any trace elements are replaced with your water changes.
__________________
Justin |
|
|