Reef Central Online Community

Go Back   Reef Central Online Community > General Interest Forums > New to the Hobby
Blogs FAQ Calendar

Notices

User Tag List

Reply
Thread Tools
Unread 09/14/2008, 08:07 PM   #1
stagger19
Registered Member
 
stagger19's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 122
Too Skim or not too Skim

Hey Everybody, Quick question here...

on a 55 FOWLR, could I skip a skimmer if I do weekly 10% WC,
and keep a light bioload?


stagger19 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09/14/2008, 08:10 PM   #2
black_majik
Registered Member
 
black_majik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 848
Really up to you. Skim or not skimming you should be doing 10 % changes either way so...

I would skim though for the quality of life for the inhabitants.


__________________
Finding Nemo: The most effective method of killing tropical marine fish.

Current Tank Info: A couple: A 75 about to get a makeover, 20g Fish Holding Tank, 12g Reef W/ Anemones and yes Uncle Frosby they are indeed mushrooms.
black_majik is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09/14/2008, 08:15 PM   #3
Mr James
Premium Member
 
Mr James's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Kernersville, NC
Posts: 6,192
Light bio-loads change soon and you will be looking for ways to get rid of your hair algae. I would skim, do the weekly water changes, use RO/DI water and have good water movement.

Leave the non-skimming to guys who have been around the block a few times.


Mr James is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09/14/2008, 08:24 PM   #4
stagger19
Registered Member
 
stagger19's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 122
Explains why I always seem to have a Hair algea problem then LOL.

My situation is that due to space I cant have my tank too far from the wall, and I dont want to go with a sump.

Of the HOB skimmers, which ones are pretty effective in the slim models. My choices would be...

The Aqua-C Remora- I dont like, since it requires the big unsighly power head in the tank

Red Sea Prizm Deluze- I heard a lot of bad things on this skimmer and how it needs to be adjusted constantly

bacpak- I think this would fit but not sure how effective this would be?


Any other suggestions on slim (~3") thick skimmers that work well???

Thanks in Advance...


stagger19 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09/14/2008, 08:40 PM   #5
black_majik
Registered Member
 
black_majik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 848
I never had issues with the Prizm models.


__________________
Finding Nemo: The most effective method of killing tropical marine fish.

Current Tank Info: A couple: A 75 about to get a makeover, 20g Fish Holding Tank, 12g Reef W/ Anemones and yes Uncle Frosby they are indeed mushrooms.
black_majik is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09/14/2008, 09:11 PM   #6
Mr James
Premium Member
 
Mr James's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Kernersville, NC
Posts: 6,192
Since you have made up your mind to go with a HOB, get an Octopus 300F...I think. A friend down the road has one on a 75g predator tank. Killer skimmer and cheaper than an Aqua C. Don't waste you time and money with cheap skimmers. Read here on RC what is considered cheap and pitiful.

Edit: The skimmer is an Octopus BH300



Last edited by Mr James; 09/14/2008 at 09:22 PM.
Mr James is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09/14/2008, 09:14 PM   #7
reefnetworth
Premium Member
 
reefnetworth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 3,810
the bacpak is a diatom holding tank, and a pain to keep adjusted. i had one, and traded it for frags!
you might have to put a hang-on on the back side of one end of the tank.
there are some that work great and some that s--k. you can "poll" those who own a hang-on starting a new thread.


__________________
GIVE A MAN A FISH, YOU FEED HIM FOR A DAY.
TEACH A MAN TO FISH, HE FEEDS HIMSELF FOR LIFE.
(NEVER, underestimate another man's greed)

Current Tank Info: SPS dominated barebottom display with BB sump since 2005, most consistant parameters in 19+ years of reefkeeping.
reefnetworth is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09/14/2008, 09:36 PM   #8
Curve
Registered Member
 
Curve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Farmerville, Louisiana
Posts: 652
I don't skim on any of my tanks and I have no problems at all.


__________________
If you don't take some meds, you're going to burn out of this hobby everytime a shrimp farts.

Current Tank Info: 210 aggresive, 3 gallon led build
Curve is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09/14/2008, 09:37 PM   #9
Mr James
Premium Member
 
Mr James's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Kernersville, NC
Posts: 6,192
But will he??


Mr James is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09/14/2008, 09:41 PM   #10
Nanook
Ancient Eskimo Legend
 
Nanook's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Saint Louis, MO
Posts: 41,852
Blog Entries: 11
Always skim, IMO, IME.


__________________
The wind blew, the chit flew, and then they came two by two.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Current Tank Info: 375g Tanganyikan Tank & 470g mixed reef
Nanook is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09/14/2008, 09:41 PM   #11
Curve
Registered Member
 
Curve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Farmerville, Louisiana
Posts: 652
Good question. I have a 135 and 150 reef going right now and I have had good luck but I have also heard horror stories from others who didn't skim. Hair algea is one of the biggest nuisances but I do 20% water changes every 3 to 4 weeks and I have no problems.


__________________
If you don't take some meds, you're going to burn out of this hobby everytime a shrimp farts.

Current Tank Info: 210 aggresive, 3 gallon led build
Curve is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09/14/2008, 11:57 PM   #12
fodupos
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Bridgeville, Pa
Posts: 325
i have a bakpak and my skimmate is really watery... i would prefer one that gave me a thicker skimmate so i don't lose as much water... it also needs adjustment alot


fodupos is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09/15/2008, 12:14 AM   #13
LisaJill
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Hillsboro, OR
Posts: 248
I had the same problem as you did - no sump, tank very close to the wall and didn't want a huge, ugly powerhead in the tank. Add to this a complete inability to manage something complicated....

I went with a Deltec MCE 600. It's on the expensive side, but it is extremely thin. and has no powerheads at all in the tank. it also takes all of 5 seconds to setup, and it's quiet.

The MCE 600 has the added advantage of being an extremely good skimmer; if you research it, you'll find good things said.


LisaJill is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:04 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Powered by Searchlight © 2025 Axivo Inc.
Use of this web site is subject to the terms and conditions described in the user agreement.
Reef CentralTM Reef Central, LLC. Copyright ©1999-2022
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.