|
12/06/2008, 01:10 PM | #1 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: wisconsin
Posts: 462
|
Halimeda...pros & cons
I would like to know what benefits halimeda offer to a tank/refugium and also any negative impact it may have.
__________________
Goooz--Frabba........Ok, that didn't work I'm still ticked off. Current Tank Info: 75 gal w/lps, zoas, shrooms, RO/DI, 500watt halide+ 108watt t5, 1500+gph flow, 10g fuge w/chaeto/rubble rock, 10gal sump w/rock, 125#'s+ live rock, 3.5" sand bed, 40 gal breeder frag tank w/250 watt halide & 192 watts actinic pc's |
12/06/2008, 01:16 PM | #2 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Carol Stream, IL
Posts: 23,162
|
One negative impact that I can think of is that it is a calcium hog, so you will have to pay closer attention to your levels. As for the benefits, it looks neat. I don't think it is very good at nutrient export compared to other macros.
__________________
Click my name and then "visit toddrtrex's homepage" for tank pictures Current Tank Info: 210g reef and 65g reef |
12/06/2008, 01:22 PM | #3 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: columbia, md
Posts: 83
|
definately sucks up calcium. i had some growing on a piece of liverock in my tank. it slowly started to spread on that rock into more stalks or branches. i would pull it off so i couldn't see anymore of it....a week later i could see it starting to grow again. i finally pulled the rock and threw it away.
|
12/06/2008, 01:46 PM | #4 |
Bogus Information Expert
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: SW Ohio
Posts: 16,147
|
The good part is that it forms a nice compact algae and has a desirable shape. Bad part is it sometimes produces massive spore outbreaks and can make a mess of the water. If havested it is a good algae IMO and the spores can be removed by a canister filter.
__________________
"Leading the information hungry reefer down the road to starvation" Tom Current Tank Info: 130 Now out of service and a 29 |
12/06/2008, 03:21 PM | #5 |
Registered Member.
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Florida
Posts: 349
|
Pros: looks coold removes nitrates and phosphates
Cons: uses calcium. May cost up to $3 in calcium a year, maybe $5 - may go sexual if not cared for, not too big of a problem with this algae though. |
12/06/2008, 07:22 PM | #6 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: wisconsin
Posts: 462
|
Thank you for the input it is only in my fuge for right now. They are under low light 24/7 along with cheato & live rock/sand.
__________________
Goooz--Frabba........Ok, that didn't work I'm still ticked off. Current Tank Info: 75 gal w/lps, zoas, shrooms, RO/DI, 500watt halide+ 108watt t5, 1500+gph flow, 10g fuge w/chaeto/rubble rock, 10gal sump w/rock, 125#'s+ live rock, 3.5" sand bed, 40 gal breeder frag tank w/250 watt halide & 192 watts actinic pc's |
12/06/2008, 09:31 PM | #7 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Chester County PA
Posts: 1,508
|
Here is a pic of my first tank, a 29 gallon that has been upgraded to a 58. I had quite a bit of Halimeda growing in it. I never had a problem with it releasing spores, as far as I know. I still have some in my 58 gallon, though not as much. I have had it pop up in new places in the tank, but I find it relatively easy to remove if I don't like where it is growing. I don't have a sump/fuge, and I presume that it helps take up nitrates and phosphates. I like the way it looks in the tank also.
__________________
Lynn 1 horse, 1 dog, 2 cats, small pond with a few koi. The fish tank is gone. |
|
|