Reef Central Online Community

Go Back   Reef Central Online Community > General Interest Forums > Lighting, Filtration & Other Equipment
Blogs FAQ Calendar

Notices

User Tag List

Reply
Thread Tools
Unread 05/09/2010, 06:34 PM   #1
d-man
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: San Diego, ca
Posts: 2,732
bubble magus nac7 or swc extreme 160

which one? the BM is brand new and $30 less then the used swc 160.

The tank is a 60 cube with 5 fish and light to med corals amounts. But in a few years the tank will be upgraded to a 110 gal or so with a higher load.

Let me know what you guys think.
thanks,
derek


d-man is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05/10/2010, 12:13 AM   #2
Johnny C
Registered Member
 
Johnny C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 4,140
IMO you won't notice much (if any) difference in performance between the two- the pump is exactly the same and the body is nearly identical. I'd probably go with the SWC-160 because the company has been around longer and is known for making quality skimmers. Either way, you can't go wrong!


__________________
"...the sea, once it casts its spell, holds one in its net of wonders forever" -Jacques Cousteau
Johnny C is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05/10/2010, 12:14 AM   #3
808Rob
Registered Member
 
808Rob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 277
I'm looking for a skimmer as well and it had come down to the two you have mentioned as well as a super reef octopus 1000int. I am pushing towards the SWC 160 because it seems easy to take apart and maintain. The cost of the SWC and SRO are exactly the same if you look around but I've seen the BM NAC7 as low as $170. That over $100 less than the other two.
If your planning on upgrading to a 110g (which is what I have), make sure you don't have more than a medium bioload. It seems that everyone has more success when the skimmer is oversized.


808Rob is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05/10/2010, 12:14 AM   #4
808Rob
Registered Member
 
808Rob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 277
I'm looking for a skimmer as well and it had come down to the two you have mentioned as well as a super reef octopus 1000int. I am pushing towards the SWC 160 because it seems easy to take apart and maintain. The cost of the SWC and SRO are exactly the same if you look around but I've seen the BM NAC7 as low as $170. That over $100 less than the other two.
If your planning on upgrading to a 110g (which is what I have), make sure you don't have more than a medium bioload. It seems that everyone has more success when the skimmer is oversized.


808Rob is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05/10/2010, 12:38 PM   #5
WI reefer55
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 294
I too am having this debate only thing I can rly think of is the (fake)gate valve on the swc and the wedge pipe on the BM

I think I might get the nac7 only be couse its $130 cheaper they have free shipping right now on there site for the nac7


WI reefer55 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05/12/2010, 07:41 AM   #6
bix
Registered Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 88
Thumbs up

Hey Guys,

I'm just wondering where you are seeing the NAC7 for cheap?

I've been looking everywhere and can't find one that is available under $220.


bix is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05/12/2010, 08:01 AM   #7
bqwertpl
Moved On
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: South Bend
Posts: 98
Quote:
Originally Posted by bix View Post
Hey Guys,

I'm just wondering where you are seeing the NAC7 for cheap?

I've been looking everywhere and can't find one that is available under $220.
Good luck finding BM NAC7 for lower than $220!!! Yeah there is a store in China, where U can get it for $170.. but then add shipping and it goes up to $240.. I wish I ordered it when it was actually cheap.. now when the rumor came about BM and how good they are.. PRICES went UP! I just got mine from store in Indy - PremiumA... for $229 plus tax (same state).. and with free shipping.. and ended up with about $246 for skimmer.. good thing, I got it next day at my door


Anyhow.. great skimmer.. and good luck finding it cheap. Nuocean seems to always push the arrival date and it is never in stock.. so I got tired of waiting.. and got it from other place.


bqwertpl is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05/12/2010, 08:39 AM   #8
mrbigshot
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: mn
Posts: 387
hes looking at a used 160, not new. same price basically. i paid $165 for my extreme 160 used.

the extreme uses a sicce pump where the bubble magus uses an atman. i would use the extreme with a red demon pinwheel.


mrbigshot is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05/12/2010, 08:41 AM   #9
ZurichOne95
Moved On
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Glen Allen
Posts: 518
I have an older model of a BM, its great!!! Loads of black oil removed


ZurichOne95 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05/12/2010, 12:32 PM   #10
WI reefer55
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 294
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrbigshot View Post
hes looking at a used 160, not new. same price basically. i paid $165 for my extreme 160 used.

the extreme uses a sicce pump where the bubble magus uses an atman. i would use the extreme with a red demon pinwheel.

I thought he was looking for the SXC 160 cone?

I have seen one of them used for a almost new price


WI reefer55 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05/13/2010, 12:26 AM   #11
808Rob
Registered Member
 
808Rob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 277
Quote:
Originally Posted by WI reefer55 View Post
I too am having this debate only thing I can rly think of is the (fake)gate valve on the swc and the wedge pipe on the BM

I think I might get the nac7 only be couse its $130 cheaper they have free shipping right now on there site for the nac7
This is the site that has the NAC7 listed as $170.
http://www.reefshops.com/





808Rob is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05/13/2010, 12:27 AM   #12
808Rob
Registered Member
 
808Rob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 277
Quote:
Originally Posted by bix View Post
Hey Guys,

I'm just wondering where you are seeing the NAC7 for cheap?

I've been looking everywhere and can't find one that is available under $220.
Sorry, wrong quote earlier. I meant to send this quote.
http://www.reefshops.com/

cheers



808Rob is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05/13/2010, 12:45 AM   #13
Reefobsession
Moved On
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: IN
Posts: 1,037
Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny C View Post
IMO you won't notice much (if any) difference in performance between the two- the pump is exactly the same and the body is nearly identical. I'd probably go with the SWC-160 because the company has been around longer and is known for making quality skimmers. Either way, you can't go wrong!
They are not identical, look at the bubble plate on the nac7 compared to the 160. The 160 had amuch larger bubbleplate. The construction on the swc is hands down higher quality than the nac7. Plus the mesh/pinwheel is much better that comes with the 160 as opposed to the mesh impellar on the nac7 which has startup issues.
Get the 160 cone


Reefobsession is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05/13/2010, 06:01 AM   #14
bix
Registered Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 88
Thank you Rob!!

EDIT: I'm in NA so looks like I can't buy from there

Cheapest I've found is 270 delivered... still going to go with it I think since it beats the crap out of anything I can get in my local shop.



Last edited by bix; 05/13/2010 at 06:08 AM.
bix is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05/13/2010, 06:24 AM   #15
Eel-byte
Premium Member
 
Eel-byte's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Duluth, Mn
Posts: 1,508
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrbigshot View Post
hes looking at a used 160, not new. same price basically. i paid $165 for my extreme 160 used.

the extreme uses a sicce pump where the bubble magus uses an atman. i would use the extreme with a red demon pinwheel.
I had a 160 extreme and miss it now. I did the pinwheel and reducer mod ($50), the thing skimmed awesome. No experience with the nac7, nice looking skimmer though.


Eel-byte is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05/13/2010, 10:35 AM   #16
stanlalee
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: hampton roads, va
Posts: 1,799
the SWC has a better neck/cup transition, better wheel in the atman 2500 and better bubble plate design. they are otherwise simular enough .


stanlalee is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05/13/2010, 11:57 PM   #17
808Rob
Registered Member
 
808Rob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 277
could those few differences mean a better skimmer?


808Rob is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05/14/2010, 12:54 AM   #18
stanlalee
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: hampton roads, va
Posts: 1,799
Quote:
Originally Posted by 808Rob View Post
could those few differences mean a better skimmer?
those differences in all likelyness should make the 160 cone significantly better. the bubble plate and neck transition in particular of the NA7 arent nearly as well designed. there have even been people upgrading their atman powered BMs with SWC bubble plates.


stanlalee is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
LF: Octopus Extreme 160 or SWC Extreme 160 Bulldog0407 Chicagoland Marine Aquarium Society (CMAS) 13 02/22/2010 10:53 PM
Bubble Magus NAC7 Skimmer goreefers Lighting, Filtration & Other Equipment 1 12/18/2009 08:53 PM
SWC extreme 160 or Octo extreme 160? jdrabek Premium Aquatics 5 08/12/2009 01:07 PM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:00 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Powered by Searchlight © 2025 Axivo Inc.
Use of this web site is subject to the terms and conditions described in the user agreement.
Reef CentralTM Reef Central, LLC. Copyright ©1999-2022
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.