Reef Central Online Community

Go Back   Reef Central Online Community > General Interest Forums > Lighting, Filtration & Other Equipment
Blogs FAQ Calendar

Notices

User Tag List

Reply
Thread Tools
Unread 03/06/2012, 11:20 AM   #1
snow_boarder151
Registered Member
 
snow_boarder151's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: North Mankato Minnesota
Posts: 23
Protein Skimmers: SWC vs. Reef Octopus

I am in the process of picking out a skimmer and have narrowed my choices down to between the SWC Extreme 160 Cone and the Reef Octopus 4" Recirculating Skimmer OCT . Can anyone give me some insight into which would be the better choice taking into account all criteria i.e. price, function, noise, lifetime. I will be running it in a 30 Gallon sump/fuge with 90 Gal. DT. Any advice would be much appreciated as this is one of the components of the system that i want to get right on the first try!
TIA


__________________
Embarking on my first build. 90 gal. display - Custom built stand - 30 gal. sump/fuge
snow_boarder151 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03/06/2012, 11:27 AM   #2
sneaton
Moved On
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: indianapolis
Posts: 742
ive had the swc for 1.5 years and turn it on and off everyday......it skims so much crap its unbelieveable....its almost silent...i say almost cause if your close to it you can hear the air sucking and bubbles popping...the quality of skim is unmatched in my eyes....plus if you order from reef filtration he will sell you new pumps for 35 bucks if it should ever fail.....


sneaton is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03/06/2012, 11:48 AM   #3
kieffer_5
Registered Member
 
kieffer_5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 66
I have heard nothing but good news for the swc. That's what I would go with


kieffer_5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03/06/2012, 12:24 PM   #4
snow_boarder151
Registered Member
 
snow_boarder151's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: North Mankato Minnesota
Posts: 23
Thats what i have been hearing as well, just needed the confirmation. So you would suggest buying from Reef Filtration? i realize i will be spending in the ball park of $300 but i would like to find it as cheap as possible.


__________________
Embarking on my first build. 90 gal. display - Custom built stand - 30 gal. sump/fuge
snow_boarder151 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03/06/2012, 12:33 PM   #5
Saltwatercoral2
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,617
if ur ball park price is 300 get a sro 2000int, its like 360 but u can find a 10% coupon code for it. Ive owned the swc skimmers and the pumps are complete junk, The sro 200int has a 3 year warranty on the pump.


Saltwatercoral2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03/06/2012, 12:41 PM   #6
sneaton
Moved On
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: indianapolis
Posts: 742
the sro pump has a 3 year warranty because its loud and rusty.....if the pump fails on the swc its 35 bucks so who cares....mine has been working great for 1.5 years so i think i got my 35 worth....sometimes big als has a 10% off coupon making the swc $246 shipped


sneaton is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03/06/2012, 12:52 PM   #7
Stupidhatmatt
Registered Member
 
Stupidhatmatt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 58
I would take the SWC 160 over the RO 4 but to me the equal comparison would be the XP1000. Keep in mind, there have been some legal issues with SWC and it seems to me (in my area) these skimmers are getting harder and harder to find.


__________________
55 Gallon LPS Reef: 3x Vortech MP10, SRO XP-1000SSS, Aquatic Life 6 Bulb T5, Bubble Magus Doser, Pinpoint Temperature Controller, JBJ 1/10 Chiller
Stupidhatmatt is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03/06/2012, 12:54 PM   #8
Stupidhatmatt
Registered Member
 
Stupidhatmatt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 58
Quote:
Originally Posted by sneaton View Post
the sro pump has a 3 year warranty because its loud and rusty.....if the pump fails on the swc its 35 bucks so who cares....mine has been working great for 1.5 years so i think i got my 35 worth....sometimes big als has a 10% off coupon making the swc $246 shipped
Yeah, you are pretty much wrong. The Bubble Blaster pumps are amongst the best in industry. Further more, the Atman pump that the SWC uses has huge problems and fails often. Even further more, the rust issue was with a small run of defective screws that has since been rectified. But hey, this is the internet and anyone can spread misinformation whenever they want.


__________________
55 Gallon LPS Reef: 3x Vortech MP10, SRO XP-1000SSS, Aquatic Life 6 Bulb T5, Bubble Magus Doser, Pinpoint Temperature Controller, JBJ 1/10 Chiller
Stupidhatmatt is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03/06/2012, 12:55 PM   #9
k.tran
Un-Registered Member
 
k.tran's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Yorba Linda, CA
Posts: 1,227
+1 the SWC owner has been having legal troubles. I would look into a different option


k.tran is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03/06/2012, 01:09 PM   #10
jason2459
Registered Member
 
jason2459's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Iowa
Posts: 9,671
I would personally choose anything but SWC considering long running moral/ethical and now legal issues. If you really want an Atman pump because they are cheap I would go with the bubblemagus or the eBay SC skimmers. They are a cheap pump but are fairly quite and with the right body have a decent production. I'm a big fan of the SRO line as the non-cone versions are a great bang for the buck and the bubble blaster pumps are more expensive but have a great warranty, comes with good customer services, and the bubble blaster pumps produce a nice balance of air/water flow which are matched up nicely with the bodies they are paired up with. Otherwise other good deals are the Vertex In series, JNS skimmers, Avast peg leg, and Aquamax.


__________________
rebuild and recovery log:
No more red house, you'll have to click on my name and visit my homepage!

You can check out my parameters at reeftronics dot net website and look for my username.

Current Tank Info: 180g mixed reef w/ a beananimal overflow to a dolomite RRUGF. | 20g long G. Smithii Mantis Tank
jason2459 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03/06/2012, 01:42 PM   #11
wildman926
Registered Member
 
wildman926's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: CTX
Posts: 2,904
Quote:
Originally Posted by jason2459 View Post
I would personally choose anything but SWC considering long running moral/ethical and now legal issues. If you really want an Atman pump because they are cheap I would go with the bubblemagus or the eBay SC skimmers. They are a cheap pump but are fairly quite and with the right body have a decent production. I'm a big fan of the SRO line as the non-cone versions are a great bang for the buck and the bubble blaster pumps are more expensive but have a great warranty, comes with good customer services, and the bubble blaster pumps produce a nice balance of air/water flow which are matched up nicely with the bodies they are paired up with. Otherwise other good deals are the Vertex In series, JNS skimmers, Avast peg leg, and Aquamax.
Good info!


wildman926 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03/06/2012, 02:06 PM   #12
drummereef
Team RC Member
 
drummereef's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: STL
Posts: 14,754
I'd go with the Octopus product any day over SWC. Long story but... I went through a battle with them a couple years ago over a manufacturing issue with an original SWC skimmer I owned. SWC was completely unwilling to fulfill their own factory warranty because I live in the States and it would have cost them too much to replace. Marine Solutions (MSX- former US dealer of SWC products) came through and allowed me to return the skimmer and was replaced (upgraded) with a 250A - Askoll pump. Now that Marine Solutions no longer deals SWC I would stay far away from them. Luckily for me the guys at Marine Solutions were accommodating to my situation even though it wasn't their battle to fight. That's not to say my SWC250A isn't a good skimmer, it's very good... just the company behind them is worthless.

CoralVue Tech- manufacturer of Octopus skimmers is located in Louisiana so if you have a warranty issue they are close by. And their tech support and parts availability is second to none. I just ordered some metric PVC from them a couple weeks ago. They were the only place in the country that had it.


__________________
-Brett

180g Marineland Starfire In-Wall 278 gallon system
drummereef is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03/06/2012, 02:08 PM   #13
Saltwatercoral2
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,617
Quote:
Originally Posted by sneaton View Post
the sro pump has a 3 year warranty because its loud and rusty.....if the pump fails on the swc its 35 bucks so who cares....mine has been working great for 1.5 years so i think i got my 35 worth....sometimes big als has a 10% off coupon making the swc $246 shipped
The pump is cheap for a reason....


Saltwatercoral2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03/06/2012, 03:35 PM   #14
jbannick18
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 312
Love my swc no issues for a year and no start up issues


jbannick18 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03/06/2012, 04:17 PM   #15
sirreal63
Go Spurs Go!!!
 
sirreal63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Meadowlakes Texas
Posts: 13,357
Quote:
Originally Posted by sneaton View Post
ive had the swc for 1.5 years and turn it on and off everyday......it skims so much crap its unbelieveable....its almost silent...i say almost cause if your close to it you can hear the air sucking and bubbles popping...the quality of skim is unmatched in my eyes....plus if you order from reef filtration he will sell you new pumps for 35 bucks if it should ever fail.....
Actually you have had it for just a few weeks past a year.

OP no question I would get the SRO, CoralVue is a top notch company who isn't in a legal battle like the SWC guy.


__________________
Jack

No One has ever been seriously injured by using the search function.

Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms should be a convenience store, not a government agency.

Current Tank Info: Reefing the Pentagon.

Last edited by sirreal63; 03/06/2012 at 05:03 PM. Reason: cat sat on keyboard, he is roasting in oven now.
sirreal63 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03/06/2012, 09:17 PM   #16
Buzz1329
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Staten Island
Posts: 2,414
Kinda reluctant to comment given the heated comments in this thread, but I hey I'm game. I can't compare the SWC 160 with the RO as I've only used the SWC. But FWIW, after a month of use on my 75, I'm happy with the SWC. I am now getting a cup of dark crud 2x a week. It's quiet and easy to adjust. But that's just me. Maybe if I had a dog in the fight, I'd feel differently. [insert Abe Lincoln icon here]


__________________
Current tank info:

180 mixed reef
Buzz1329 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03/06/2012, 09:22 PM   #17
sirreal63
Go Spurs Go!!!
 
sirreal63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Meadowlakes Texas
Posts: 13,357
Most of the skimmers on the market give results that are very close to the same. Pick what works for you based on your needs. :-)


__________________
Jack

No One has ever been seriously injured by using the search function.

Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms should be a convenience store, not a government agency.

Current Tank Info: Reefing the Pentagon.
sirreal63 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03/06/2012, 09:54 PM   #18
Retired Reefer
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Northern Calif. Ukiah
Posts: 133
I've never owned a Reef octopus but i've owned a SWC. Go with the Reef Octopus.


Retired Reefer is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03/06/2012, 10:44 PM   #19
sneaton
Moved On
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: indianapolis
Posts: 742
Quote:
Originally Posted by sirreal63 View Post
Most of the skimmers on the market give results that are very close to the same. Pick what works for you based on your needs. :-)
if you want light tea colored skim get the RO....if you want "Epic" dark diarrhea then the SWC is the way to go.......plus the SRO is kinda ugly IMHO


sneaton is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03/06/2012, 10:45 PM   #20
sneaton
Moved On
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: indianapolis
Posts: 742
Quote:
Originally Posted by sirreal63 View Post
Actually you have had it for just a few weeks past a year.

OP no question I would get the SRO, CoralVue is a top notch company who isn't in a legal battle like the SWC guy.
SWC is in a legal battle over paper work....


sneaton is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03/06/2012, 10:53 PM   #21
sirreal63
Go Spurs Go!!!
 
sirreal63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Meadowlakes Texas
Posts: 13,357
Quote:
Originally Posted by sneaton View Post
SWC is in a legal battle over paper work....
Actually it is a lot more than paperwork, but a simple google search will enlighten you on the issues. I am curious, with all of the SWC pushing you do, do you have a poster of the 160 with the words "Seth, SWC is your Father" written under it? :-)


__________________
Jack

No One has ever been seriously injured by using the search function.

Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms should be a convenience store, not a government agency.

Current Tank Info: Reefing the Pentagon.
sirreal63 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03/06/2012, 11:00 PM   #22
sneaton
Moved On
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: indianapolis
Posts: 742
i just love to push what works,everytime i stink the whole house up with 2 days of skim i feel i should post about it ... and ive seen alot of bubbleblaster/RO complaints....everyone loves to push bubble magus too,it uses the same pump and its not up to par with the build of the swc


sneaton is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03/06/2012, 11:11 PM   #23
sirreal63
Go Spurs Go!!!
 
sirreal63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Meadowlakes Texas
Posts: 13,357
I do understand that, but they all work, and you cannot compare a newer skimmer with the one you had before the 160, vastly different technologies. You basically have used one real skimmer, that isn't really enough to claim it is the best thing ever made. There is very little differentiation between skimmers any more. Almost everyone uses the same technology with only slight changes in equipment. Once upon a time SWC and Octo were the exact same skimmer, made by the same Chinese mfg. The only way to tell them apart was the sticker. They are both good skimmers, but neither is superior by any large amount.


__________________
Jack

No One has ever been seriously injured by using the search function.

Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms should be a convenience store, not a government agency.

Current Tank Info: Reefing the Pentagon.
sirreal63 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03/06/2012, 11:13 PM   #24
Reefnut2010
Registered Member
 
Reefnut2010's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: San Gabriel Valley, Ca
Posts: 427
I have a SWC180 xtreme cone with Sicce pump and it has proven to be a great skimmer. Skimmate is dark and thick on a daily !! I am unaware of any problems with this co. What's the deal ? i have also owned an Octopus skimmer and though it great for the $$$. Either of this skimmers will work nicely if in the right size system.


Reefnut2010 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03/06/2012, 11:14 PM   #25
KafudaFish
Cyprinius carpio
 
KafudaFish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,496
Is customer service important to you?


KafudaFish is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
protein skimmer, reef octopus, swc


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:24 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Powered by Searchlight © 2025 Axivo Inc.
Use of this web site is subject to the terms and conditions described in the user agreement.
Reef CentralTM Reef Central, LLC. Copyright ©1999-2022
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.