|
04/10/2013, 10:10 AM | #1 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Seattle, Wa
Posts: 540
|
LEDs, which set is better
So I'm trying to compare two different LED fixtures that are set up differently to see which one is better, but when it comes down to it, I can't figure it out. Both use 3w Bridgelux LEDs. I'm not naming either fixture other than A or B so I don't get any brand hate going on.
Fixture A has 55 LEDS: 16x 12K White, 2x 6500K White, 2x 420nm Violet, 27x 450nm Royal Blue, 2x 480 Blue, 2x 520 Green, and 2x 660nm Red. 3 Fixture B has 55 LEDS: 13x 4500K neutral white, 4x 480nm Blue, 6x 420nm Violet, 30x 450nm Royal Blue, and 2x 660nm Red Both have the same dimension. Thoughts? |
04/10/2013, 10:29 AM | #2 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 20
|
A looks to have more color spectrum
|
04/10/2013, 10:42 AM | #3 |
Duke of Monte Fisto
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 722
|
I'd go for the one with the most violets, unless Fixture A can be customized to add more.
__________________
Dumbest Quotes Ever..... "Great color, great growth" closely followed by "all water parameters fine" |
04/10/2013, 10:45 AM | #4 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 150
|
I'd go with b just cus i like to have my a higher blue to white ratio
Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk 2 |
04/10/2013, 10:46 AM | #5 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Seattle, Wa
Posts: 540
|
Do the whites matter much between the two?
|
04/10/2013, 11:07 AM | #6 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: NJ
Posts: 489
|
B is an easy decision.
Whites over 5000K are very short on spectrum and look "odd" to many users, I'd avoid any fixture that uses these CW LEDs and absolutely avoid LEDs over 7500K under all circumstances. Green LEDs are a waste, Green light not used in photosynthesis and more than enough green light is provided by all white LEDs. The 12000K LEDs put out nothing but blue and green light, that fixture does not need more green. People are used to looking a color temperature numbers on MH and fluorescent lamps and seeing numbers like 14000K or 20000K, this is not the same as the numbers used for a combination of LEDs. MH and fluorescent fixtures don't usually have a giant actinic bulb and a suplimental 14000K white. LED fixtures have large quantities of RB emitters so you can even get a blue tank from 2800K warm white LEDs if you want. The warmer the white, the wider the spectrum, warm whites don't put out as much RB, but you have RB LEDs for that. I'd consider "A" to be a worthless piece of junk, "B" is a lot better but could use more violet. |
04/10/2013, 09:22 PM | #7 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Seattle, Wa
Posts: 540
|
Ok, now that I've had some input on this, I'll reveal the fixtures!
Fixture A is an Evergrow D120 that a local store gets in and "custom tunes". $219.99 Fixture B is the Value Fixture (Evergrow again) from ReefBreeders. $179 Both look exactly the same, only thing that is different is the LEDs installed. |
04/11/2013, 06:31 AM | #8 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cape Coral, FL
Posts: 10,431
|
Quote:
1) White is the combination of all colors. And I understand 3500K vs 6500K vs 10K etc. But they are all more or less 'white'. So how do you say one has more or less spectrum than another? I thought they all run from UV to infra red, just some have a bit more yellow, or red or blue. And please explain how an led over 5K white looks 'odd'? It's white! 2) Why more violet? Corals don't need more if they are already getting enough shades of the blue spectrum (420nm-460nm). And most led suppliers have issues with 400nm and 410nm leds burning up. So why go for more? To the OP: It's a tough choice without knowing which brand of led is being used. The same mix of white and blue in Cree leds will look different with Bridgelux or Epistar.
__________________
The good thing about science is that it's true whether or not you believe in it. (Neil deGrasse Tyson) Visit my build thread http://www.reefcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?t=2593017 |
|
04/11/2013, 07:46 AM | #9 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Seattle, Wa
Posts: 540
|
Both are Bridgelux from the same supplier.
|
04/11/2013, 08:18 AM | #10 | |
Duke of Monte Fisto
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 722
|
Quote:
The UV range of light is what most research points at stimulating coral pigments the greatest. Not for photosynthesis, but pigments for blocking the uv, which ends up coloring the coral.
__________________
Dumbest Quotes Ever..... "Great color, great growth" closely followed by "all water parameters fine" |
|
04/11/2013, 10:38 AM | #11 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Seattle, Wa
Posts: 540
|
Do you think it'd be worth it to mod in some UV LEDs? I found some bridgelux at $8 a piece, but I think they were 395nm, I'll have to look again.
|
04/11/2013, 02:59 PM | #12 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 754
|
I have pretty much choice "a" on my frag tank...if the light is close to the surface of the water i really dont like the red/green in the mix, it makes a pinkish hue to the top couple inches of the water, when i raise it up 6 inches this disappears.
if picking again would pick choice b... because i like the blue look |
|
|