|
10/29/2016, 12:41 PM | #1 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Cumming, GA
Posts: 421
|
Apex DOS or Stenner Double Head
My AWC using a dual head Masterflex is not working out... input and output doesn't match. I am at a decision point: Do I replace to Masterflex with a Stenner or an Apex DOS?
I like that the DOS meters input/output, but the Stenner has more muscle. I'll be lifting about 8' then a 50' run through the attic. Does anyone have enough experience with the DOS to know if it is strong/durable enough? |
10/29/2016, 01:33 PM | #2 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 2,136
|
I've been toying with the idea of a dual head Masterflex and found out that I would need adjustable heads to match the input/output.
Did you use heads with adjustable occlusion? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Vincent 40g custom AIO --> DSA190Pro |
10/29/2016, 01:37 PM | #3 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Cumming, GA
Posts: 421
|
No... just felt the Masterflex was old, and the heads old too. But adjustable occlusion heads may be the way to go. I would hate to buy the new Stenner only to have the same problem.
|
10/29/2016, 02:45 PM | #4 |
New Old School
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Luzerne County, PA
Posts: 3,293
|
You will want an adjustable occlusion head. Basically, you're dealing with (manufacturing tolerance variation of the pump head+variance of the tubing diameters)*pump revolutions.
I use DOS and it works just fine, but the difference between a DOS and a Masterflex/Stenner/Watson Marlow is like night and day. |
|
|