Reef Central Online Community

Go Back   Reef Central Online Community > General Interest Forums > Reef Discussion
Blogs FAQ Calendar

Notices

User Tag List

Reply
Thread Tools
Unread 03/23/2006, 08:25 PM   #1
fishykid9212
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Southern NH
Posts: 1,470
Anyone use vodka to lower nitrates?

I've heard, adding vodka to the water will grow bacteria that will get rid of nitrates, has anyone tried it and are there any instructions on how to use it? thanks


fishykid9212 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03/23/2006, 08:26 PM   #2
BenH98
Registered Member
 
BenH98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 515
I'd rather drink it then put it in my tank But i've never heard of such a thing


__________________
Go KINGS!!!

Current Tank Info: 29 Gallon
BenH98 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03/23/2006, 08:30 PM   #3
itstheantitang
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 477
Aren't alcohols used as antiseptics? It could kill of the nitrogen cycle.
I'm not sure about vodka, because it is a grain alcohol.


__________________
Ignore the smoke and smile...
itstheantitang is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03/23/2006, 08:34 PM   #4
BenH98
Registered Member
 
BenH98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 515
That's weird that this thread just came up... lower on the page is almost the same exact question - there are a few more answers too

http://www.reefcentral.com/forums/sh...hreadid=803863


__________________
Go KINGS!!!

Current Tank Info: 29 Gallon
BenH98 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03/23/2006, 08:35 PM   #5
der Riff-Konig
Premium Member
 
der Riff-Konig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 686
DUG THIS UP.



The "Theory" Behind Ethanol Additions to Aquariums

A German magazine recently published an article suggesting and recommending the dosing of ethanol (as vodka) to reef tanks as a carbon source for marine heterotrophic bacteria in order to increase denitrification rates and bacterial biomass production (Mrutzek and Kokott 2004). Further, they claimed that additions cause rapid declines in nitrogen and phosphorus produced by fish, invertebrates, and algal metabolism (ironic, since many aquarium invertebrates and algae are sinks, not sources, for nitrogen and phosphorus). In turn, the bacteria provide a food source for corals and other filter feeders. The method is recommended particularly for those tanks that are highly skimmed (and probably lack particulate material) and which lack sand beds. Tanks with sand beds or other sediment-based systems, they mention, react unusually and may have adverse effects to ethanol additions.

"Experiments" were performed (and I use the term experiment loosely to mean the typical uncontrolled, unreplicated, statistically insignificant sort of "let's add it, see what happens, and produce results that show how my tank never looked better" sort of trials that are often found in aquarium literature). The results showed a precipitous decline in nitrogen and phosphorus levels over approximately one month with increasing doses of vodka. The sample size for the experimental procedure was one (n=1), consisting of a single person's personal home aquarium. There were no controls in the experiment (i.e. an identical tank without vodka being added to see if there actually were results from the treatment). In fact, the sample tank received an increasing dose of vodka during the treatment, making any dosing effect impossible to determine. Additional support for the "experiment" was collected by casual replication in completely different trials in even less controlled conditions; that is, other aquarists began adding vodka and claimed similar "results."

Results of this work also showed a number of other effects. A large "bloom" occurred which clouded the test tank, an occurrence that could and often does kill tank inhabitants. It was assumed the bloom was bacterial, but no mention was made if and how the cloudiness in the tanks was determined to be bacterial. Given what I will offer below, it may also have simply been carbonate precipitation brought about by additional carbon addition and possibly microbial mediation. Having fortuitously escaped tank mortalities, the tank cleared and the authors literally state how "the tank water had never been clearer, the coral polyp extension was better, and the coral coloration was more intense." Where have I heard this before? The observed decrease in nitrate and phosphate is an interesting effect, but I will discuss this in more detail below.


__________________
People who think they know what they're doing are especially annoying to those of us who do.

Current Tank Info: 125 with 30 sump, two 58's with 20 sumps. 55, two 30's.
der Riff-Konig is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03/23/2006, 08:40 PM   #6
BenH98
Registered Member
 
BenH98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 515
That is very interesting! Where is the rest of it?


__________________
Go KINGS!!!

Current Tank Info: 29 Gallon
BenH98 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03/23/2006, 08:42 PM   #7
reefD
Registered Member
 
reefD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Schenectady,New York
Posts: 4,968
sounds like something to try at the start of a tanks life with NO LIVE STOCK! as mentioned above i would rather drink it and let my tank grow its bacteria the natural old fashioned way....with time and lots and lots and lots and lots and lots of patience. heck you can get your water crystal clear other ways too.


__________________
DAVID

Current Tank Info: it has four sides and a bottom...oh yeah and it has water in it. lol
reefD is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03/23/2006, 08:44 PM   #8
der Riff-Konig
Premium Member
 
der Riff-Konig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 686
Here's the whole article.

http://www.reefkeeping.com/issues/20...ture/index.php


__________________
People who think they know what they're doing are especially annoying to those of us who do.

Current Tank Info: 125 with 30 sump, two 58's with 20 sumps. 55, two 30's.
der Riff-Konig is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03/24/2006, 03:18 PM   #9
grochmal
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 647
http://reefcentral.com/forums/showth...5&pagenumber=1


__________________
Jeff

Current Tank Info: 125 gallon bare-bottom reef, 6' Maristar light, Tunze streams, 55 gallon sump, ASM G3 skimmer, RDSB
grochmal is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03/24/2006, 03:55 PM   #10
kewliz
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 718
I always thought vodka lowered inhibitions .... not nitrates.


kewliz is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03/24/2006, 07:18 PM   #11
ufchristyb
Registered Member
 
ufchristyb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Fort Lauderdale
Posts: 269
Hmmm, seems like a waste of perfectly good vodka.


__________________
GO GATORS!

Current Tank Info: Possible future 55g unreef safe fish tank
ufchristyb is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:19 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Powered by Searchlight © 2025 Axivo Inc.
Use of this web site is subject to the terms and conditions described in the user agreement.
Reef CentralTM Reef Central, LLC. Copyright ©1999-2022
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.