![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Registered Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: London
Posts: 462
|
Eggcrate over your tank + light question
has anyone put eggcrate over their tank to stop fish from jumping? im thinking of doing it over my tank to stop fire gobies from going carpet surfing, any ideas?
will my lights be greatly filtered? i am running a 250w halide with two t8 over 24inch of water but with the possibilty of adding 3 exra t5 at another date. Also any suggeted light set ups? i was thinking 10k with all blues or 20k with white t8 and using the t5 to adjust and get the look right (maybe more white needed i dont know!) all help aprreciated madok ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Perry, OK
Posts: 13,946
|
Adding eggcrate (AKA Light diffuser) is fine. If properly placed, it will wither focus your light, or spread it out. It depends if you put it top down, or bottom down.
As far as the lighting goes. It's your preference. Actinic doesn't do much for coral growth. So, you could go with a 6500K-10,000K for awesome growth and actinics for a little coral color support, or you can go with slightly less growth going 14,000K-20,000K and "White" T5s for growth. The first one would give good growth and little color all the way to the bottom of the tank. The latter would give you great color with decent growth at the bottom of the tank. It's really all how you want your tank.
__________________
Travis Stevens Current Tank Info: Restarting 28g Bowfront |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Registered Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: London
Posts: 462
|
what do you mean by top down or bootom down? is there a top and bottom?
btw folks, here is my light set up ![]() what would you advise to go in each space?? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Registered Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: London
Posts: 462
|
whoops didnt realize it would be so small
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Bostonian in Chicago going to DC
Posts: 9,908
|
Its a bunch of squares. Its lighting diffuser. It defuses light. So yeah, you lose light. I think you'd be better with a canopy personally.
__________________
NO TANKS!!! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Registered Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: London
Posts: 462
|
green lines are t5, pink are t8 and the purple square is the halide. ill try and post agin.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Registered Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: London
Posts: 462
|
![]() what would you advise to go in each space?? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Here
Posts: 1,106
|
I used to use one. It definitely lost a good 10% of the light. And one fish even managed to jump out with the egg crate on.
I eventually built a canopy out of acrylic and got rid of the egg crate, much more happy. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Here
Posts: 1,106
|
BTW, what he meant about top/bottom is that literally there is a top and bottom to egg crate. The bottom of egg crate, the plastic gets thinner, the top is thicker. But let me assure you, either way you orient the egg crate, there will be a loss of light.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Bostonian in Chicago going to DC
Posts: 9,908
|
Some light will always reflect off the eggcrate, some will go straight up, and be completely lost, but even the stuff that still goes down, you're losing 10% or so. (reflecting off the plastic, 90% efficient at most).
__________________
NO TANKS!!! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
funky member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Hacienda Heights (605 and 60 fwy)
Posts: 1,893
|
you can get the chrome plated eggcrate... i like it more than the white one
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Aurora, IL
Posts: 1,763
|
<<< BTW, what he meant about top/bottom is that literally there is a top and bottom to egg crate. The bottom of egg crate, the plastic gets thinner, the top is thicker. But let me assure you, either way you orient the egg crate, there will be a loss of light. >>>
<<< Some light will always reflect off the eggcrate, some will go straight up, and be completely lost, but even the stuff that still goes down, you're losing 10% or so. (reflecting off the plastic, 90% efficient at most). >>> ......not according to the thread where A. Calfo says the eggcrate actually puts more light into the tank via focusing otherwise lost light into the water, assuming you put the tapered side facing up. He also linked to a scientific study that confirmed this I believe. I believe someone also claimed the eggcrate also acts as a beneficial heatsink and absorbs or reflects some of the heat off the lights which would otherwise heat up the water.
__________________
Florida live rock addict |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Here
Posts: 1,106
|
With all due respect to A Calfo (without whose advice my tank would probably suck), I think he is wrong. I had egg crate for months and switched it out because it was actually more light disruptive than my old glass canopy. There is no question that my tank is brighter now.
Of course, I use CF lights. Is it possible that A Calfo was speaking about MH? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Aurora, IL
Posts: 1,763
|
Quote:
I don't remember, maybe someone can search out that thread here. I was told however that what we perceive as being more or less bright is not always what benefits the tank and PAR values though. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Premium Member
![]() Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Seattle, WA, USA
Posts: 1,707
|
The light loss from eggcrate directly under a bulb or a parabolic reflector is not very much, because the light is coming straight down and the percentage of area blocked is fairly low.
But, as the angle of the light increases, the amount of blockage from the eggcrate increases as well. So, with the lighting arrangement you have, you would have quite a bit of area with significantly-reduced light intensity.
__________________
Don |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: West Los Angeles
Posts: 3,746
|
do this instead...much better - worked for me
![]()
__________________
"Beer is living proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy. " - Benjamin Franklin Current Tank Info: 180g SPS |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
Registered Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: London
Posts: 462
|
i cant do that as it is a standalone cube without a canopy, just a neat trim around the top.
but surely if i have a 250w halide 2 t8 and 3 t5, ill still be able to keep nearly any species of coral/clam i want right? also what would people suggest for choice of lighting i.e colurs of bulbs? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Here
Posts: 1,106
|
I think with that much wattage, you should be AOK. I am using compacts, so to me any loss of light is undesireable. For you it may not be such a big deal. Proof will be in the pudding (or SPS).
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Bostonian in Chicago going to DC
Posts: 9,908
|
Quote:
THis stuff is designed to spread light out for office buildings. It does that by reflecting it off in different directions. Its designed purpose is to spray light everywhere, which is exactly what we dont want in a reef. From the stuff I have, there is NO difference on what side you have. (I have the chrome stuff) My stuff is completely symmetrical. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
Registered Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: London
Posts: 462
|
ok well im gonna try it anyway.
bulb and lamp colour choices? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#21 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Cheektowaga, NY
Posts: 629
|
I've done a bit of a compromise in the past, and had a "frame" of eggcrate, a strip about 5" wide across the rear of the tank to prevent jumpers from escaping out of the open back of the hood. New hood is fully enclosed so it's no longer necessary, but it worked well and blocked only minimal light output when it was implimented.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|