Reef Central Online Community

Go Back   Reef Central Online Community > General Interest Forums > New to the Hobby
Blogs FAQ Calendar Mark Forums Read

Notices

User Tag List

Reply
Thread Tools
Unread 07/28/2008, 11:01 AM   #1
TANK0789
Moved On
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 672
what tank is better?

Its 120 one is 4feet by 2feet and 2feet high the other is I think 5feet by a foot or foot and a half. I hope to have couple tangs and a trigger along with an eel. Does it make a difference?


TANK0789 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07/28/2008, 11:05 AM   #2
kar93
Registered Member
 
kar93's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Lincoln
Posts: 5,521
If you want Tangs then go with the 5ft tank, they need maximum amount of swimming space you can provide. If you can, go with 6ft depending on what Tangs you want to keep? But for Eels, a deeper tank is better because they can escape easily and triggers get big so both length and depth are needed.


kar93 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07/28/2008, 11:08 AM   #3
Sk8r
RC Mod
 
Sk8r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Spokane WA
Posts: 34,628
Blog Entries: 55
It's a hard choice: if only one is reef ready go with that. But tangs swim up and down as well as longwise, and among other fish you get more jumpers in a shallower tank. I'd say to support tangs well, get some strong flow in there, and a good skimmer and maybe a fuge for good oxygenation. Which is a way of saying the stand might make a difference too, in what you had room to do under the stand.


__________________
Sk8r

Salinity 1.024-6; alkalinity 8.3-9.3 on KH scale; calcium 420; magnesium 1300, temp 78-80, nitrate .2. Ammonia 0. No filters: lps tank. Alk and cal won't rise if mg is low.

Current Tank Info: 105g AquaVim wedge, yellow tang, sailfin blenny,royal gramma, ocellaris clown pair, yellow watchman, 100 microceriths, 25 tiny hermits, a 4" conch, 1" nassarius, recovering from 2 year hiatus with daily water change of 10%.
Sk8r is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07/28/2008, 11:11 AM   #4
TANK0789
Moved On
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 672
So length and depth on thanks guys!


TANK0789 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07/28/2008, 04:36 PM   #5
raggie
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Churchville PA
Posts: 142
deff go deep tank you can stack better rocks and give the fish enough hiding spots


__________________
Shark Tanks

Current Tank Info: 55 Gallon long reef tank, in process 1000+ shark tank
raggie is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07/28/2008, 04:56 PM   #6
mattpenn
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: j'ville,florida
Posts: 66
i would go deep also


mattpenn is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07/28/2008, 05:47 PM   #7
sentencedme
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Alsip, illinois
Posts: 535
I has the same debate when bought my tank.....Now, I prefer my 4 by 2 by 2 for my FOWLR.
tangs love it with my rock set up


sentencedme is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07/28/2008, 05:47 PM   #8
sentencedme
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Alsip, illinois
Posts: 535
had......not has........check out my gallery


sentencedme is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07/28/2008, 06:11 PM   #9
smoothlarryhughes
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Perkiomenville, PA
Posts: 134
i would rather have a deep tank front to back...taller tanks you need more light


smoothlarryhughes is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:31 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Powered by Searchlight © 2025 Axivo Inc.
Use of this web site is subject to the terms and conditions described in the user agreement.
Reef CentralTM Reef Central, LLC. Copyright ©1999-2022
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.