|
|
|
11/03/2008, 02:48 PM
|
#1 |
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 18
|
Tnuze nano for 33g+17g sump
This is ok? I'm on the limit of compagny specification, so Tunze nano for 33g+17g sump in fish only, this is ok?
Thank 
|
|
|
|
11/03/2008, 04:00 PM
|
#2 |
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Anaheim, CA
Posts: 1,248
|
Seems really good. You could get away with the 6025 and if you want more flow you could modify it.
|
|
|
|
|
11/03/2008, 04:18 PM
|
#3 |
|
Moved On
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 3,263
|
I'm using a Tunze Nano skimmer for my 37g+15g sump. I do have a DSB tho, which is displacing about 5g. Mine is a reef tank and it is only 2 and half weeks old. Contains approx. 35lbs of liverock. The skimmer is working well and my water is clean. However, it is not my intention to have a heavy bio-load and will be relying on my 6.5g slow-fuge for additional natural filtration later on.
|
|
|
|
|
11/03/2008, 05:17 PM
|
#4 |
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Goodyear, AZ
Posts: 513
|
Hi Mr. ZKY
I have no experience with a Tunze nano because a friend borrowed mine brand new to see if it worked on his 55 FOWLR predator tank and refused to give it back. I consider that to be a positive endorsement. He was nice enough to pay for it though. Good luck
__________________
Edge you mah cating myself Check out my gallery if you desire. Current Tank Info: 50 gallon mix of soft, LPS and SPS, two croceas, two maximas, a few fish, turf filter with skimmer, MH and PC lighting, chiller, Calcium Reactor and wave2k. |
|
|
|
|
11/03/2008, 06:32 PM
|
#5 |
|
Moved On
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 5
|
+1
|
|
|
|
|
11/03/2008, 07:52 PM
|
#6 |
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 18
|
I finnaly buy a tunze, i will receive it this week
|
|
|
|
 |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
