|
03/21/2016, 04:27 AM | #1 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: USA
Posts: 261
|
Algae Scrubber vs Algae Reactor
Algae Scrubber vs Algae Reactor?
Which is a better/faster avenue for nutrient export? |
03/21/2016, 04:41 AM | #2 |
Super Housemonkey!
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: St Louis Mo
Posts: 4,442
|
I've never used an algae scrubber.
But my ARID E18 reduced my PO4 levels from 0.08 to 0.00 in 11 days. ARID E18 Phosphate Control. I'm not disparaging algae scrubbers at all. I've just never used one. I think a better question is which method is easier to use and maintain over the long haul. Whichever one of those methods works best for you is the one you should use.
__________________
A good friend will come and bail you out of jail...but, a true friend will be sitting next to you saying, "Damn, that was fun!" |
03/21/2016, 07:30 AM | #3 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 199
|
Quote:
My ATS has only been up for 3 weeks now and I will already swear by them and recommend them. I have a pretty bad nutrient problem so my algae growth has really taken off. And I have seen a very significant decrease in algae in just the last 3 weeks. I did a lot of reading about scrubbers before I decided to build one and basically it's just like growing macro algae in a fuge, except the macro is on steroids. Kind of comparable to the algae reactor posted above, but IMO still just a bit more effective. Read the guide on how to size, light and get the correct flow for a scrubber which is found in the algae turf scrubber basics thread. Then you can correctly size an ATS for your system so it can really kick ***. Just a note: you don't need to have an ATS in a box for it to work well, I just prefer to keep the light contained as my stand is currently open. Building the DIY box Finished box over the sump Screen after 5 days (first cleaning) Screen after 14 days (second cleaning) An example of some of my rocks from 4 weeks ago (left) and this week (right). A lot of snails were added 2 months ago but until the ATS was added the algae would grow faster than the snails could eat it. I was pulling out 2 cups of algae and it would be back in less than a week, even with the snails. Now the snails can eat the algae and it doesn't grow back thanks to the ATS.
__________________
Tank Journal - http://web2.reefcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?t=2489289 "Love is the feeling you get when you like something as much as your motorcycle" |
|
03/21/2016, 08:19 AM | #4 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: CTX
Posts: 2,904
|
Quote:
__________________
Beware of recommendations by those who don't actually use their recommendation!! The search function actually works quite well!! Tanks:Planet Aquarium 150g LPS, Planet Aquarium 90g Softie |
|
03/21/2016, 09:25 AM | #5 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Lincoln, CA
Posts: 274
|
I think the turf algae on an ats would probably be able to adjust growth quicker that the chaeto in the reactor.
__________________
Brian Cooley Current Tank Info: 26"x26"x18" BB Cube w\ats and led, 12g Nano Cube |
03/21/2016, 04:09 PM | #6 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: USA
Posts: 261
|
|
03/21/2016, 04:41 PM | #7 |
Grizzled & Cynical
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Stamford, CT
Posts: 17,319
|
Not sure I really see why that would be?
I would think that the two would be equivalent export mechanisms. What's a more interesting question to me is whether growing chaeto in a dedicated reactor is superior to growing it in a refugium. I run both an ATS and chaeto in large refugium (nominally 40 gallons), and am planning to experiment with a DIY chaeto reactor as well.
__________________
Simon Got back into the hobby ..... planned to keep it simple ..... yeah, right ..... clearly I need a new plan! Pet peeve: anemones host clowns; clowns do not host anemones! Current Tank Info: 450 Reef; 120 refugium; 60 Frag Tank, 30 Introduction tank; multiple QTs |
03/21/2016, 05:11 PM | #8 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Lincoln, CA
Posts: 274
|
In my previous experience the ATs has removed more nutrients quicker than any other calurpa or chaeto, hair algae grows really quickly.
__________________
Brian Cooley Current Tank Info: 26"x26"x18" BB Cube w\ats and led, 12g Nano Cube |
03/21/2016, 10:13 PM | #9 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: 90713
Posts: 1,391
|
I'm going to be running a L4 Turbo Scrubber and a Pax Bellum 24 Arid Reactor. If I had to choose one I would probably go with the ATS simply because its much cheaper, you can DIY fairly easily.
If I were you I would DIY a scrubber and see how its working. I see more and more people who used to have Chaeto tumbling in their sump / refugium and switched it to ATS with great success. Having said that, from the people who I've talked with who have used the Arid reactor, they have been extremely impressed.
__________________
120" x 34" x 30" 540g Build Starting Soon! Royal Exclusiv Dream Box Sump, 2 x 60" ATI LED/T5, DaStaCo CARx, Apex, Genesis, BK SM 250, 3 x RD 3 230w, UV, ATS, & Arid Reactor! Will have build thread so |
03/22/2016, 12:00 AM | #10 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: USA
Posts: 261
|
Quote:
I have been running a L4 Turbo/HF ATS for over a year and it is not enough.... I simply don't have sump space for in-sump Chaeto growth. I have an Algae reactor on order. I am setting up an additional tank and haven't decided ATS vs Reactor or both... Are you currently running a L4? I personally think recommendations for ATSs are over rated. Why aren't you going to use a L8 with the ARID 24? wildman926 I assume both would be better than either one, but I don't have the space for the new tank I'm setting up.... |
|
03/22/2016, 02:18 AM | #11 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 3
|
I run both an ATS and chaeto in large refugium
|
03/22/2016, 06:50 AM | #12 | |
New Old School
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Luzerne County, PA
Posts: 3,293
|
Quote:
|
|
03/22/2016, 09:04 AM | #13 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Louisville,Kentucky
Posts: 1,208
|
For equipment junkies I would think the ARID would ring a bunch of bells. An algae scrubber will do the same work. Maybe not as sexy as an ARID.
__________________
President Louisville Marine Aquarium Society. http://www.lmas.org/ The 3rd Annual Frag swap will be held September 23rd,2017 11 am till 3pm Saint Thomas Fellowship hall,9616 Westport Road,Louisvi |
03/22/2016, 09:48 AM | #14 | |
Grizzled & Cynical
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Stamford, CT
Posts: 17,319
|
Quote:
__________________
Simon Got back into the hobby ..... planned to keep it simple ..... yeah, right ..... clearly I need a new plan! Pet peeve: anemones host clowns; clowns do not host anemones! Current Tank Info: 450 Reef; 120 refugium; 60 Frag Tank, 30 Introduction tank; multiple QTs |
|
03/22/2016, 10:22 AM | #15 | |
Moved On
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: auburn CA
Posts: 4,021
|
Quote:
Its a question of wattage used, ATS wins hands down. You can grow chaeto under a powerful light in clean water, but you can grow GHA with low wattage in clean water. Chaeto for me under 30w of light grows like crazy for 6 weeks until the water is cleaned up then dies off. As to where I can always harvest my ATS under 30w lights. Now if you water is not the cleanest because you feed like crazy, you can grow or use both methods with success. |
|
03/22/2016, 04:16 PM | #16 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: USA
Posts: 261
|
ca1ore
your stated "as I noted above, I've built a large Chaeto..." Sorry I must have missed the above statement.... I understood you were planning to experiment with a DIY... How big is the reactor you have built? what is the design like? Is it center or outer light design? I am considering a DIY algae reactor... Also you said "I think the key to an algae reactor is the ability to get your arm into it to clean the sides." I assume the ARID and ClearTides Algae Reactors use a light in the center design so that you only need to clean the center tube holding the lights. Which would be much easier(smaller area) to clean than the inside walls of a reactor tube. Last edited by OhMatic; 03/22/2016 at 05:10 PM. |
03/22/2016, 08:01 PM | #17 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: CTX
Posts: 2,904
|
Quote:
No issues cleaning the inside of my DIY converted Aquamaxx reactor.
__________________
Beware of recommendations by those who don't actually use their recommendation!! The search function actually works quite well!! Tanks:Planet Aquarium 150g LPS, Planet Aquarium 90g Softie |
|
03/22/2016, 09:05 PM | #18 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: USA
Posts: 261
|
wildman926
That looks like pretty good growth. How often do you take that much out? If I had an extra reactor I would probably do a design similar to yours, but I don't and my tank is in a room with no AC. This morning at 10:00am my tank was 82.5 degrees and although I don't think higher temps hurt too much(the waters my fish come from frequently runs 85) I don't want to add a source of heat either |
03/22/2016, 09:44 PM | #19 | |
Grizzled & Cynical
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Stamford, CT
Posts: 17,319
|
Quote:
No idea how well it will work, or how maintenance intensive it will be. 20W strip light wrapped around the outside of an old skimmer body (6" diameter; 24" tall) with aluminum tape to act as light block and heat sink.
__________________
Simon Got back into the hobby ..... planned to keep it simple ..... yeah, right ..... clearly I need a new plan! Pet peeve: anemones host clowns; clowns do not host anemones! Current Tank Info: 450 Reef; 120 refugium; 60 Frag Tank, 30 Introduction tank; multiple QTs |
|
03/22/2016, 09:57 PM | #20 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: USA
Posts: 261
|
Ca1ore
Your DIY algae reactor looks nice! How thick are your top and bottom pieces? I was thinking of making the same thing size wise 6" X 24". I'm still debating putting lights on the inside vs outside. My feeling is the inside lights would require less cleaning/scrubbing area wise and less time to clean... |
03/22/2016, 11:33 PM | #21 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: 90713
Posts: 1,391
|
Quote:
I do not think I will need an L8 even with a 450g display tank. I will be running an L4, Arid 24, BK SM 250, and a 80w UV. Between the Skimmer, Arid 24 and ATS that is more then sufficient.
__________________
120" x 34" x 30" 540g Build Starting Soon! Royal Exclusiv Dream Box Sump, 2 x 60" ATI LED/T5, DaStaCo CARx, Apex, Genesis, BK SM 250, 3 x RD 3 230w, UV, ATS, & Arid Reactor! Will have build thread so |
|
03/23/2016, 12:56 AM | #22 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: USA
Posts: 261
|
ArmanS
Wow! a "450g display tank." that sounds massive to me... but I guess what matters more is the amount of nutrients you add to it each day... I have a L4(on a "small tank"), an oversized skimmer, Biopellet reactor and a 36w UV filter. I was surprised that I still get GHA growth in my display... I have an algae reactor on order and hopefully that will do the trick. My point was simply I think the L4 recommendations are over rated... I do try to over size my filtration but that's just me. |
03/23/2016, 08:24 AM | #23 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: CTX
Posts: 2,904
|
Quote:
I like having the led's outside. The heat sinks get to dissipate heat without adding heat to the tank, and if one fails, I can notice it readily, it wont be too much of an affect on the operation of the unit, and I can change it at my leisure.
__________________
Beware of recommendations by those who don't actually use their recommendation!! The search function actually works quite well!! Tanks:Planet Aquarium 150g LPS, Planet Aquarium 90g Softie |
|
03/23/2016, 10:04 AM | #24 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: USA
Posts: 261
|
wildman926
Thanks, So how often do you need to "clean" your algae reactor? I have never grown Chaeto as a nutrient export... Do you clean your ATS weekly? I have to clean my ATS weekly or it starts to clog up. |
03/23/2016, 10:36 AM | #25 |
Moved On
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: auburn CA
Posts: 4,021
|
|
Thread Tools | |
|
|