|
|
|
03/08/2006, 01:26 PM
|
#1 |
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Winston Salem, NC
Posts: 425
|
Corals and Bioload
Do corals increase the bioload of a tank enough that we should only add a couple at a time. Are they as heavy of an increase as fish or is it less?
|
|
|
|
03/08/2006, 04:21 PM
|
#2 |
|
Moved On
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: west hartford, CT
Posts: 3,480
|
slower is better, but i dont think because a bioload...
not sure dont trust only me on that, try posting in reef discussion, moere people look at it |
|
|
|
|
03/08/2006, 04:35 PM
|
#3 |
|
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: BC. Canada.
Posts: 14,351
|
This thread has been moved to the current forum.
__________________
Darren Beauty fades.... Stupid is forever...... Current Tank Info: 34 Gal Solana with some lights.. and pumps that make water move. And fish... |
|
|
|
|
03/08/2006, 04:39 PM
|
#4 |
|
Premium Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: City of Angels
Posts: 405
|
I never really have that problem simply because I don't have eneough money to go and buy a ton of corals
 . I usually add one or two small pieces every 2 or 3 weeks at the moment. I am very selective on what I get and read up on it (ever since my impulse flower pot buy) to make sure every coral I add will play nice in my tank and will be adequate for my light and water conditions.
|
|
|
|
|
03/08/2006, 04:45 PM
|
#5 |
|
Premium Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Green Bay, Wi.
Posts: 4,455
|
Its better to go slow. Corals become stressed during shipment and tranfers. During this time they can discharge toxins in small amounts. Running fresh activated carbon is always a good idea after adding new specimens.
__________________
"Just a drop in the bucket" |
|
|
|
|
03/08/2006, 05:26 PM
|
#6 |
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,356
|
Believe it or not coral's actually reduce the overall bio load.
If you're doing it right and qt'n them first there should be no problem with adding a bunch at the same time. |
|
|
|
|
03/09/2006, 05:23 AM
|
#7 |
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 106
|
I'm with O'Brien on this one. Coral filter feed your tank better then most filters. Sure coral expelle waste but not in the ammouts that fish do. Large amounts of coral actually make water changes stretch. I do a water change on my 58 gallon once a month at the most.
|
|
|
|
|
03/09/2006, 06:28 AM
|
#8 |
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Winston Salem, NC
Posts: 425
|
Alright then, Thanks for all of the advice. I didn't think about the release of toxins due to stress but I guess that would make since.
Thanks |
|
|
|
|
03/09/2006, 06:38 AM
|
#9 |
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 14,441
|
I've found when I add more than a couple corals at a time [like monthly] ... I don't give the corals as much attention and often at least one suffers because of it [don't keep as close an eye as I can, or one becomes unglued, or I put the prettier coral in the visible spot - when another would probably best in those conditions.
I've not had bioload problems, but have lost a handful of frags that way - mainly through poor glue attachment [mostly Acropora] and just not noticing the first day or two they fell into the rockwork ... After a month, they've grown onto the rockwork, or have stabilized and are acclimated to their conditions ...don't need as much attention [and having looked at them 100 times, I won't forget about one of the 5 new corals for a few days]
__________________
read a lot, think for yourself Current Tank Info: 58g stony reef [250w10k, 250w 20k MH, 2x vho act, Octopus150, 6060 + 6000] ; 60g mixed tub |
|
|
|
 |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
