|
12/21/2017, 08:52 AM | #1 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 46
|
Conflicting dKH tests
Newbie here! I have a 75 gal display tank with dry rock, a 33 gallon trigger sump with .25lb Chaeto in the refuge section. Simplicity skimmer running during current cycle. The tank is nearing the end of it's first cycle with nitrite level at 0.1. I have been using Red Sea and Salifert test kits. parameters are as follows:
dKH=9-10 Red Sea test kit Mg=1400 Red Sea test kit Ca=425 Red Sea test kit After running the Red Sea dKH test a few times, I wanted to try an easier testing method so I bought a Hanna Checker. Ran the test twice and got dKH readings of 6.7 and 6.8. Any thoughts on why the big difference in readings and what to do about it? |
12/21/2017, 08:58 AM | #2 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: New Brunswick, Canada
Posts: 590
|
Watch a youtube video on how to do each test. I was doing red sea tests in a way that wasn't entirely accurate.
Also, with the Hannah Checker did you hold the button for the second vial to give it the three minute countdown? |
12/21/2017, 09:11 AM | #3 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 20,050
|
What salt mix are you using?
Are you sure you are using/reading the syringe properly?.. you go by the plunger (bottom of the cylinder) and not the fluid level when reading it.. So the plunger may be at 1.0mL but the fluid only a .8mL.. you have 1mL of liquid and not .8mL But yes.. try the videos to ensure you are doing it right and also post the salt mix you are using... They all state their "as freshly mixed" values so you should be able to compare to that too..
__________________
Who me? |
12/21/2017, 10:20 AM | #4 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: St. Augustine, FL
Posts: 1,857
|
Don't consider .1 a big diff with regard to the Hanna readings. I've often seen a .1 or even .2 difference when doing tests back to back. Many reasons this could occur, all have to do with testing errors. Slight volume diff in the plunger and/or water volume, or dirty testing vial.
As for the 3 min count down, never heard of this nor is it depicted in the Hanna instructions nor videos.
__________________
90g Mixed Reef |
12/21/2017, 10:24 AM | #5 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Central Nebraska
Posts: 3,190
|
I believe OP is talking about the difference between the Hannah reading of 6.7/6.8 and the Red Sea reading of 9-10.
Since this tank is new, and there shouldn't be much alk demand, and freshly mixed saltwater should be closer to the 9-10 dKH range, I would suspect testing error with the Hannah Checker. I haven't used Hannah checkers, so I can't help further than that.
__________________
Pat Current Tank Info: 125 in-wall , 40b sump. 6 bulb T5. ASM G2 skimmer. LPS and leathers |
12/21/2017, 10:28 AM | #6 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: St. Augustine, FL
Posts: 1,857
|
Quote:
I only use the Red Sea for magnesium now since the Hanna are much simpler and faster. Maybe there is an explanation out there for why they vary so much.
__________________
90g Mixed Reef |
|
12/21/2017, 10:30 AM | #7 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 705
|
Quote:
The alk, as you said, is instantaneous. |
|
12/21/2017, 05:35 PM | #8 |
RC Mod
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Mountain View, CA, USA
Posts: 88,616
|
I agree with making sure that you're using each test kit correctly. That difference is large enough to be an issue. I'm not sure which result is more accurate. If checking the video and instructions carefully doesn't clear up the issue, you might need to get a third opinion.
__________________
Jonathan Bertoni |
12/22/2017, 03:03 PM | #9 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 46
|
Thanks. I'll be rechecking my techniques.
|
12/22/2017, 03:36 PM | #10 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Dewitt MI
Posts: 5,051
|
I primarily use the Hanna checker and periodically cross check, mainly if I get a reading that I question, with my Salifert kit. They are usually within .1 or .2 two of each other and when there was a big variance between the two I retested with the Hanna and it was within .1. Operator error.
I trust the Hanna to be about as accurate as you can get with hobby grade equipment.
__________________
Gary 180 gallon, 40 gallon sump, 3 250 W MH + 4 80W ATI T5's, MTC MVX 36 Skimmer, Apex controller Aquamaxx T-3 CaRx Current Tank Info: A 2 Barred Rabbitfish, Red Head Salon, Yellow/Purple, McMaster Fairy, Possum, 2 Leopard Wrasses, Kole, & Atlantic Blue Tangs, 2 Percula Clown, 3 PJ and 1 Banggai Cardinalfish , Swallowtail, Bellus and Coral Beauty Angels |
12/27/2017, 01:05 PM | #11 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 57
|
I prefer salifert. It used to come with a ref check. Hanna is to flimsy based on how u preform the test
|
12/29/2017, 11:55 AM | #12 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 46
|
Update!
After checking my technique and springing for a LaMotte test kit, I am getting the following readings:
Hanna Checker: 8.9 dKH LaMotte: 10.64 dKH Red Sea: 10 dKH These readings would seem to be within a reasonable margin of error for hobby test kits. If averaged, I get about 9.8 dKH which is just fine. I consider the problem solved and really appreciate the suggestions form the veterans on this thread. Thanks again! |
12/29/2017, 03:21 PM | #13 |
RC Mod
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Mountain View, CA, USA
Posts: 88,616
|
I agree that those numbers are close enough for hobbyist kits. I'd consider the problem solved.
__________________
Jonathan Bertoni |
12/30/2017, 07:21 AM | #14 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,985
|
I'm not surprised. I got a Hanna checker and tested it against a friends. Using my new and thier 6 month old reagent and the same sample of water pulled from the top middle of the tank we got 4 different results that varied by .9 dKH (~.5 dKH with the same reagent). I think APIs Alk test is far easier and may be more accurate if the sample is doubled then divided by 2 (or trippled then divided by 3)
__________________
"Our crystal clear aquaria come nowhere close to the nutrient loads that swirl around natural reefs" Charles Delbeek |
12/30/2017, 12:11 PM | #15 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 265
|
I use API with a 1ml syringe and multiply reagent used by 26.4 confirmed by a NSW standard. I find this to be ''good enough'' and very inexpensive.
__________________
Easy does it... Current Tank Info: 40b. sps, Metal Halide,big skimmer,lots of flow, barebottom, natural seawater. |
|
|