|
12/20/2010, 07:34 PM | #3376 |
Moved On
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Socal
Posts: 2,315
|
I don't know of anyone running an ATS and pellets. If you have the ATS working at capacity, it might be worth trying.
|
12/20/2010, 08:08 PM | #3377 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: texarkana, TX
Posts: 1,364
|
or try taking the ATS offline and see if the nitrates bump up to the right ratio for the PO4 to then come down with the NO3. Or in my case just jump start it all with sugar doseing. Like Mary Poppins said "...a spoon full of sugar helps the N and P go down..."
sorry I'm in a goofy mood. :P
__________________
dave Current Tank Info: 58g reef, 60 total gallons including rocks and sand, 36" 6 bulb ATI Powermodule, DAS skimmer, Bio pellets, 2 MP10 vortechs |
12/23/2010, 08:35 AM | #3378 |
Registered Member
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 204
|
I have been using BP for about 3 months now in my 120g DT and 50g sump and so far its been pretty great. My water is clearer and my N and P are definitely way less. My sps all have colored up and are showing pretty good signs of growth.
By next month, Im actually going to be adding a new fuge to my tank where i will place a DSB, liverocks, and a little macroalgae. This isnt really for reducing N or P further but to develop the organisms like pods and whatnot that will help feed my SPS. Would my macroalgae all just die? Does anyone keep macroalgae that do okay with BP in their systems as well? |
12/23/2010, 02:45 PM | #3379 |
Moved On
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Socal
Posts: 2,315
|
I keep chaetomorpha and green grape caulerpa. Both grow, not as fast as they did before BP but they still grow.
|
12/24/2010, 10:44 AM | #3380 |
Registered Member
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 204
|
Should i still add a DSB to that fuge? I was thinking that it would just be redundant since the BP will take care of the nutrients and the little left will be taken by the macroalgae so the DSB will basically be useless. Am i right in saying that? I was still going to put maybe 1 or 2 inches of sand to house critters like pods which provide food for the corals.
|
12/24/2010, 10:44 AM | #3381 |
ReefKeeping Mag staff
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: West Seneca NY
Posts: 27,691
|
I keep chaetomorpha refugia for the habitat and opposite photoperiod oxygenation. The chaeto does reasonably well even with carbon dosing with PO4 in the .03 to .05ppm range and NO3 sub 1ppm. In the past I dosed a little iron for the chaeto with good results.
__________________
Tom Current Tank Info: Tank of the Month , November 2011 : 600gal integrated system: 3 display tanks (120 g, 90g, 89g),several frag/grow out tanks, macroalgae refugia, cryptic zones. 40+ fish, seahorses, sps,lps,leathers, zoanthidae and non photosynthetic corals. |
12/24/2010, 11:41 AM | #3382 |
SPSahollic
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: terneuzen , netherlands
Posts: 875
|
I had to upgrade my lighting in order to keep my chaeto alive and growing in combination with the bp's
greetingzz tntneon
__________________
May the flow be with you ! Current Tank Info: 154 G SPS dominated + 25 G sump ; lighting : 210 W LED XPG/XRE (sunrise) + 150 W T5 (bl+ , 15°K , fiji , bl+) ; skimmer : Royal Exclusive supermarine 200 ; BM 3-Ch dosing pump (CA/ ALk and top-off) ; tunze 6085 circulation |
12/25/2010, 06:35 AM | #3383 |
Registered Member
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 204
|
I plan to keep mostly chaeto in opposite photoperiod of the tank.
tntneon, what lights are you using for your chaeto now? |
12/25/2010, 12:32 PM | #3384 |
SPSahollic
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: terneuzen , netherlands
Posts: 875
|
hi ryanuuy ,
I use an 26 watt PL lamp 6500°K , i'm very happy with this lamp here 's a link of a dutch online shop thats sells them http://www.aquariaveldhuis.nl/index....productID=8141 greetingzz tntneon
__________________
May the flow be with you ! Current Tank Info: 154 G SPS dominated + 25 G sump ; lighting : 210 W LED XPG/XRE (sunrise) + 150 W T5 (bl+ , 15°K , fiji , bl+) ; skimmer : Royal Exclusive supermarine 200 ; BM 3-Ch dosing pump (CA/ ALk and top-off) ; tunze 6085 circulation |
12/28/2010, 08:45 AM | #3385 |
Jade
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Peoria, AZ
Posts: 1,760
|
I'm going to give the biopellets a try in my heavily stocked 240. I have a Precision Marine Reactor on the way, 20 inch tall by 4.5 inches dia.. I have a Mag 2.5 sitting around, curious if this would work ok, or is it too much flow? Also curious if anybody has tried the Warner Marine ecoBAK ULNS Pellets? Premium Aquatics seems to be fond of them....Thanks.
__________________
Current Tanks- 465 Gallon in wall FOWLR 450 Gallon in wall Mixed Reef Hobby experience-since 2001 |
12/28/2010, 10:35 AM | #3386 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 304
|
Should be fine with the flow. I'm using a mag 3 on a 6" diameter reactor (18" high). Works okay for me. I've only used SWC and Vertec which look identical. I suspect any one of the products will work, not sure how much difference the actual binding agents might make, but everyone seems to be reporting good results from any of the brands.
SJ |
12/31/2010, 03:36 PM | #3387 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Northampton, PA
Posts: 1,135
|
If you happen to overfill your reactor and cant get any tumbling of the media, would it be safe to remove some pellets, dry them off, and store them in an airtight container
|
12/31/2010, 04:34 PM | #3388 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 304
|
yes... rinse in ro water first though.
|
12/31/2010, 04:39 PM | #3389 |
RC Mod
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Mountain View, CA, USA
Posts: 88,616
|
I agree that a rinse in RO water would help reduce any precipitation on the media, and maybe remove some organics. The media should be fine.
__________________
Jonathan Bertoni |
12/31/2010, 07:29 PM | #3390 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Northampton, PA
Posts: 1,135
|
Great, thanks for the prompt response!
|
01/01/2011, 09:45 AM | #3391 |
SPSahollic
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: terneuzen , netherlands
Posts: 875
|
happy new year everyone !!!!!!!
tntneon
__________________
May the flow be with you ! Current Tank Info: 154 G SPS dominated + 25 G sump ; lighting : 210 W LED XPG/XRE (sunrise) + 150 W T5 (bl+ , 15°K , fiji , bl+) ; skimmer : Royal Exclusive supermarine 200 ; BM 3-Ch dosing pump (CA/ ALk and top-off) ; tunze 6085 circulation |
01/01/2011, 10:00 AM | #3392 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 1,468
|
Just found this thread. Is there a concise run down on one or two of these pages? 136 pages is a lot of reading. Can someone help a fellow reefer out?
Thanks in Advance |
01/01/2011, 01:27 PM | #3393 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Dayton, OH
Posts: 606
|
It's been a month now using the Vertex pellets and my GHA has definitely been dying off at a good rate. I still have some left on the plumbing and powerheads but most of it is gone from the rock.
My nitrates started at 20 when I first added the pellets and thought it wouldn't be too long before they reduced down to nearly zero. However, I just tested again and they went up to 60! My only theory here is that the GHA die-off has caused this to happen but I haven't heard anybody else report this so I'm skeptical that's the reason. Currently I'm running a full liter (1000ml) of the pellets in a TLF550 with total water volume of 300G. At first I was pushing a lot of water through the pellets to keep them fluidized but didn't see any change in the GHA or get the typical algae bloom so I slowed the flow down somewhat and that brought the bloom I expected but the pellets started to clump up so I increased the flow again. I haven't heard of anybody really commenting on the optimal flow rate for the pellets, only to keep them gently tumbling. I also have another liter of the pellets sitting on standby so maybe I should add more pellets. Anybody have any suggestions or ideas here?
__________________
-- Rik Current Tank Info: 120G Reef - AI Hydra 26HD lighting, AquaC Skimmer, Reeflo Blackfin Pump, Gyre XF250 Dual Pumps, Aqua Medic Dosing Alk/Ca/Mg & Vinegar, HydroFill Ti ATO, Basement Sump w/Refugium and Kessil 160 Blue Lights |
01/01/2011, 03:09 PM | #3394 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 72
|
Havent seen mention of the tlf pellets, which I began using in the tlf 150 reactor about 2 weeks ago. Will report results as seen!
|
01/01/2011, 06:10 PM | #3395 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Fairbanks, Alaska
Posts: 399
|
well, seem like i can't control the amount of bacteria too much. i have LPS slowly receeding. there is a film of translucent bacteria then slowly they die. i did a lugo's dip today for all the infected corals. i also reduce the amount of pellets in half (125 ml for 50 total gallons of water). i think i might have low bioload and the pellets depleted nutrient in the water and too much bacteria for my bioload. side note, all my sps are doing really good.
__________________
Tuanito Tranito Current Tank Info: my little heaven: 40 Breeder nano reeftank (1 year old-refugium/sump 20 gallons) |
01/01/2011, 08:41 PM | #3396 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Amarillo
Posts: 292
|
My Update
Well its been 4 weeks since I added the first 500mL of the WM Ecobak pellets and two weeks since I added the second 500mL. The skimmer has been producing a whole lot more foam than before so I thought I might see some difference in the params this time - at least a little improvement. But no, My "trates are still 80+ on my API tests and the Salfiert tests are still showing 50 or so. It's hard to compare since you don't have the vials and their colors from the last tests. I even tested the water coming straight out of the TLF reactor that contains the first batch of pellets (the ones that have been tumbling for a month now). That reading was still 80+ on the API tests. So unfortunately I don't have any good news to provide for my tank. I'll let you know how the tests go next couple of weeks or so.
__________________
SaltyNovice |
01/01/2011, 10:26 PM | #3397 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Dayton, OH
Posts: 606
|
Quote:
Here's what I can summarize through the last few months of reading these: 1) Add the pellets slowly initially. Take a couple of weeks at least to get up to the final amount of pellets you want to run. This seems to reduce the algae blooms you will experience at first. 2) You need to keep the pellets tumbling but how much seems to be subjective. In my personal experience, if you don't tumble them enough they will clump together. 3) Most people try to dump the effluent of the reactor at the input of the skimmer pump in order to reduce the bacterial bloom. IMHO this may not really do much but it's a current "best practice". Either way, expect your skimmer to kick into overdrive when using the pellets so make sure the skimmer is ready to handle the load. There is still a lot of experimentation to be performed here. Results are too variable to form solid opinions for the most part. You will also find a mixed camp on things such as adding some form of starter bacteria supplement or how these will really (or if at all) these will change the water chemistry and what we have to do to create the ideal environment for the pellets to be effective. The bottom line is there really isn't one. It doesn't require an extreme investment so if you have an available reactor and have an issue with algae or your nitrates/phosphates are too high then consider just giving them a try for yourself. If you read my previous post, you'll see that even though my nitrates seemed to go up, my GHA is definitely receding. Figure that one out!
__________________
-- Rik Current Tank Info: 120G Reef - AI Hydra 26HD lighting, AquaC Skimmer, Reeflo Blackfin Pump, Gyre XF250 Dual Pumps, Aqua Medic Dosing Alk/Ca/Mg & Vinegar, HydroFill Ti ATO, Basement Sump w/Refugium and Kessil 160 Blue Lights |
|
01/02/2011, 08:42 PM | #3398 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 1,468
|
Rik,
Thanks for the run-down. At least now I have an idea of what it's about. Thanks again |
01/02/2011, 10:19 PM | #3399 | ||
Registered Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 304
|
Quote:
Quote:
I did this rather serendipitously when I was wondering why my tank params were taking months to change. I'm now at the conclusion that it takes time. I was coming down from somewhere well over the 160ppm that the api test measures. I've been running the pellets for about 3.5 months in total now; and run approx. 3.5L on a 500g (total) system. I just hit 40ppm convincingly (sometimes hard to decipher the shades of red) over the last couple of weeks. I expect to be down below 10 by February. In all I'm guestimating it will take me a total of 5 months to go from 200+ppm to 0ppm nitrates. My phosphates are currently around .5ppm, but I've removed my gfo until my trates get down to zero, as there has to be a ratio of both in existence for the system to work. The bucket test did in fact help me to confirm that the system was in fact working correctly. The effluent coming directly off of the reactor will not be very different from that going in. There is a dwell/contact time factor that figures in. But give your bucket 12 hours, and both trates and phates will measure absolute zero. In my case, I was then comfortable with adding more pellets to my reactor. Hope this helps. Regards, Sheldon |
||
01/02/2011, 10:34 PM | #3400 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 304
|
BTW - make sure you have a powerhead running if you are going to have your pellets in your bucket for more than a day or two, otherwise you will end up with a stench or hydrogen sulfide when you pour off the water, more proof that there is copious amounts of bacteria inhabiting your pellets.... I experienced this, rinsed off the pellets in a well ventilated area a couple of times, and threw them there pellets back into the reactor - they continued to work fine...
SJ |
|
|