|
12/15/2009, 11:47 AM | #401 | |
Reefer
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: RI
Posts: 344
|
largish reactor
Quote:
|
|
12/15/2009, 03:30 PM | #402 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 227
|
Is there a retailer list for this product?
Curious to see if there's any Canadian retailers yet. (cross border shipping is spendy) |
12/15/2009, 07:07 PM | #403 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 227
|
nm found one carry on. I`ll report on my findings once I get em going.
|
12/19/2009, 02:50 AM | #404 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 3,727
|
so...does this reduce phosphate or just maintain it? read 17 pages, but didn't really see a definite answer.
__________________
Economy sucks bad! Lets pray for the best! in the meantime, liquidation! |
12/19/2009, 06:24 AM | #405 |
Pro-Protozoa
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Tampere, Finland
Posts: 1,228
|
How BPs affect phosphate levels depends entirely on input. As bacteria grow and multiply they will take up (among other things) phosphate and nitrogen from the water column. The problem is that the ratio of these in bacteria is "locked"(*) and thus if you are introducing either one in excess no bacteria based method is going to be able to reduce that one to "zero".
Unfortunately many invertebrate foods have high phosphate levels and thus you might need GFO to take care of that excess. High nitrogen input might not need any special action because of the denitrification happening inside the live rock and sand bed. (*) not really locked, heterotrophic bacteria are able to alter their N:P content based on the environmental conditions but there are limits to that.
__________________
Tatu Vaajalahti Tampere, Finland Current Tank Info: 240 gal + 50 gal sump,SDSB,LR,ATB Medium, 2x250W HQI + actinic,Balling |
12/19/2009, 01:33 PM | #406 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: 619 baby!
Posts: 297
|
Are saying is that the function of N and P uptake by the bacteria while using the NP Biopellets is simply a function of the surface area of the pellets themselves? if this is the case, then why not use a smaller pellet, or mechanically reduce their size? (blender, or food processor)
If this is the case then as the pellets are consumed,and get smaller in diameter, more pellets are added, to get back to the original total volume, there will be a rise in the functionality of the beads in total. (more total surface area of the beads per total volume of beads)
__________________
efficiency is the new horsepower Current Tank Info: 12 asst fw+sw tanks |
12/19/2009, 02:14 PM | #407 |
Premium Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Moss, Norway
Posts: 7
|
From yellow to pink
The Biopellets has changed color from yellow/white to pink/white (See picture) Is this a good or a bad sign ?
/Pål Last edited by 1538Moss; 12/19/2009 at 02:52 PM. |
12/19/2009, 06:37 PM | #408 |
Moved On
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 386
|
Pink, thats a new colour. mine is still white after 4 weeks.
|
12/19/2009, 10:50 PM | #409 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 3,727
|
Then if this doesn't reduce phosphate after the balance of N & P changes, then what is the difference between running a sulfate denitrator with gfo in combination?
__________________
Economy sucks bad! Lets pray for the best! in the meantime, liquidation! |
12/20/2009, 08:19 AM | #410 |
Reefer
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: RI
Posts: 344
|
I'm running mine with a GFO reactor in parallel. The bacteria will reduce N and P in a set ratio. If you reduce the N too much, then they will be N-limited and therefore stop reducing P. P is not likely to be the limiting nutrient, however. I feel that this combination will allow me not to worry about H2S from a sulfate reactor, the system will stay aerobic with enough pumping capacity (flow-through and tumbling). It also allows me to leave the tank for the holidays without worrying about malfunctioning dosing pumps. So far I've seen a reduction in nuisance algae and cyano, and better coloration from my SPS corals in my DT.
|
12/21/2009, 12:26 AM | #411 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 212
|
are you guys letting the pellets tumble in the reactor?? just wondering as i have it running right now and afraid if i let the flow enough to move the pellets they will grind them down thus wasting them
|
12/21/2009, 09:24 AM | #412 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Glendale, Arizona
Posts: 1,430
|
Any updates from the new users who have used to for about a month or so now? Would really appreciate it if I could get some feedback to know if this product is worth the expense. Thanks.
__________________
Daniel Restarting my tank 90g 20g Life Reef sump 5ft Life Reef Skimmer See my album for pre-build tank pictures. |
12/21/2009, 10:50 AM | #413 | |
Moved On
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Harper Woods, Michigan
Posts: 55
|
Quote:
|
|
12/21/2009, 03:12 PM | #414 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Milan, MI
Posts: 154
|
Taggin Along
|
12/21/2009, 05:21 PM | #415 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Stuart, FL.
Posts: 80
|
7 Days in...
Running the pellets seven days now. 500ml in my 90.
Tapered of my VSV from 3ml a day to just one now, plan to be at zero by end of next week. Observations so far... Corals look good (no real change) What little cyano I had seems to be retreating. I am running GFO and a little carbon too. Skimmate has remained the same (dark and stinky). Jon
__________________
Current Tank Info: 90 gal. SPS, 2x250 watt HQI + 4xT5, Aquamaxx ConeS CO-1 skimmer, Vertex Zeo Reactor, Chiller, MRC Calc Reactor fed by Cole-Palmer Masterflex... Stock: Regal Angel, Pair Mitratus |
12/21/2009, 10:23 PM | #416 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Bridgewater, MA
Posts: 1,234
|
Quote:
__________________
Paul Dec 08 TOTM Current Tank Info: Envisions 427gal |
|
12/21/2009, 10:34 PM | #417 |
Registered Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Buffalo NY
Posts: 962
|
how much would i need for my 120? i know they sell it in 500 and 1000ml. i thought i bag of 500ml would be good?
|
12/21/2009, 10:35 PM | #418 |
Registered Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Buffalo NY
Posts: 962
|
i was also planning on buying a bulk reef supply jumbo reactor. i think i could fit plenty of pellets in there
|
12/22/2009, 08:28 AM | #419 | |
Reefer
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: RI
Posts: 344
|
Quote:
|
|
12/22/2009, 08:55 AM | #420 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Bridgewater, MA
Posts: 1,234
|
The recommended dose is 500-1000ml of pellets per 500 litres of tank water.
__________________
Paul Dec 08 TOTM Current Tank Info: Envisions 427gal |
12/22/2009, 08:57 AM | #421 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Glendale, Arizona
Posts: 1,430
|
My understanding is that the pellets are consumed as used and need to be replaced once they are gone. So if your system has more needs, then the pellets will be consumed quicker and you will eventually figure out how much is needed for your tank.
__________________
Daniel Restarting my tank 90g 20g Life Reef sump 5ft Life Reef Skimmer See my album for pre-build tank pictures. Last edited by Daniel Reef; 12/22/2009 at 08:58 AM. Reason: typo |
12/22/2009, 09:03 AM | #422 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Glendale, Arizona
Posts: 1,430
|
I would like to know if users of the pellets are also using ozone or a UV sterilizer and whether they negatively impact the use of the pellets.
__________________
Daniel Restarting my tank 90g 20g Life Reef sump 5ft Life Reef Skimmer See my album for pre-build tank pictures. |
12/22/2009, 09:03 AM | #423 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Bridgewater, MA
Posts: 1,234
|
I think it is the size of the bacterial population that is important. If there are not enough pellets, then there will just not be enough bacteria present to consume the the nutrients in the water. Presently I am dosing vodka. The bacterial population is spead out over the whole system. If I stop the dosing, that population will decline. I would need to replace at least the same amount growing on the pellets. I could be wrong, but I think this is a situation were more equals better. There is probably a lot of leeway here.
__________________
Paul Dec 08 TOTM Current Tank Info: Envisions 427gal |
12/22/2009, 09:07 AM | #424 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Bridgewater, MA
Posts: 1,234
|
Quote:
__________________
Paul Dec 08 TOTM Current Tank Info: Envisions 427gal |
|
12/22/2009, 09:11 AM | #425 |
Coral Curmudgeon
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: western NC
Posts: 1,663
|
True - it seems that the use of UV - on the downstream side of the pellets should not have any effect. On the upstream side tho - it may slow the activation of them fully.
Shouldn't the reccomendation for the volume of pellets needed be based on the amount of N and P that you need to remove - vs - the volume of water in the system? It would make for better utilization of the product. T
__________________
No....really honey, it was a gift! Current Tank Info: 700 gallon combined reef/frag systems - 650gal Cichlid system |
|
|