|
03/20/2012, 11:10 PM | #26 |
RC Mod
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Mountain View, CA, USA
Posts: 88,616
|
It's nominally a bit better, but we don't know whether it performs up to spec.
__________________
Jonathan Bertoni |
03/21/2012, 04:58 AM | #27 | |
Reef Chemist
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Arlington, Massachusetts
Posts: 86,233
|
Quote:
In any case, that means that any readings within a 0.03 ppm range would be considered indistinguishable. I've been wondering whether the silicate that I and some others dose might interfere at the very low end since it is a known interferent with that method, but Hanna's tech folks didn't know.
__________________
Randy Holmes-Farley Current Tank Info: 120 mixed reef |
|
04/27/2012, 12:11 PM | #28 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: corpus christi, tx
Posts: 488
|
Hanna has refunded my defunct Ca Checker.
I have a new reagent kit and the unused part of the original packaging if anyone is interested...
__________________
125 FOLR, 30 gal sump w/LR, SWC 16 |
Tags |
calcium tester, hanna calcium checker, hanna checker, hanna instruments, phosphate |
|
|