![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#26 |
Premium Member
![]() Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: NW IL
Posts: 1,603
|
I guess the more larger the tank the more freedom you have. This is a really interesting post. I think people use a lot of LR for what's been said:
1. Filtration 2. Different levels of coral 3. The fish will fight over territory. These 3 things would get more compounded as you talk about a smaller and smaller tank. Also allows you to put more highly light dependent corals towards the top. I don't think my tank would be that interesting without a lot of LR and even less fish. But I'm only working with 3' too. I do enjoy new ideas on these large tanks. Inspires me for future projects. Great looking tanks. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#27 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 3,737
|
I have a ton of open space right now, but after I have some big sps colonies in there, it will fill in a lot... Have to leave plenty of room for years of coral growth.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#28 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Eagle River, Alaska
Posts: 2,360
|
My fish swim in the open area most of the time the lights are on. In and out of the rock, yes, but mostly in the wide open space -- especially the tang.
I think it can be done minimalist, but you do have to pay attention to filtration since massive quantities of LR can alleviate lots of common problems. I have an oversized (for the tank), highly effective skimmer (Euroreef CS-180), solid flow (32X turnover), and a macro refugium, albeit a small one. Meanwhile, the tang is swimming circles in the vortex/venturi/whatever where the Tunze streams cross -- near the right front. ![]()
__________________
Unattended children will be given double shot espresso and a free puppy. Current Tank Info: 125g FOWLR -- Conversion Back To SPS In Progress |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#29 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Orlando. FL
Posts: 536
|
Awesome discussion, thank you everyone!
Another thought -- the filtration benefits of the LR are probably maximized by the water movement in a display tank... the LR doesn't have garbage settling all over it like it could/would in a slower moving refugium or LR holding tank connected to the display. What are your thoughts on having powerful pumps in a LR holding tank, in order to maximize the filtration capability of rock. Is it a necessary thing if there's minimal LR in the display? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#30 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Orlando. FL
Posts: 536
|
Thanks to Anemonebuff for posting his tank in another thread! I wanted to link it here for people following this thread to see as well:
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#31 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Langhorne
Posts: 904
|
DJ Nutz over at CSI because of you and I think it was Dans pictures I know have a nice saltwater tank.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#32 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Eagle River, Alaska
Posts: 2,360
|
Taku -- I personally think you should maximize flow in the display tank regardless of your setup -- as much as your livestock can be happy with. My display LR is always very clean except for a few spots that I hit with a turkey baster every week or two. With a minimalist type tank, it's probably even more important to have strong flow. A LR holding tank would be a decent idea, but stuffing vacant areas of the sump should do the trick fine.
That Anemonebuff tank is sweet!
__________________
Unattended children will be given double shot espresso and a free puppy. Current Tank Info: 125g FOWLR -- Conversion Back To SPS In Progress |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#33 |
Registered Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Benicia, CA
Posts: 1,601
|
clord, i think it was my pictures :finger1:
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#34 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Orlando. FL
Posts: 536
|
Quote:
Clord -- that's awesome ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|