Reef Central Online Community

Go Back   Reef Central Online Community > General Interest Forums > The Reef Chemistry Forum
Blogs FAQ Calendar

Notices

User Tag List

Closed Thread
Thread Tools
Unread 02/06/2010, 02:13 PM   #676
jmoney
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: San Marcos, TX
Posts: 970
Quote:
Originally Posted by las View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by las
I have a 90 gallon with a 4" Deep sand bed... My plan is to remove the sand bed and use the NP bio pellets.

How much of the bio pellets should i use for this tank?( I purchased 1000ml)

Should i let the bio pellets get established with the bacteria before i remove the sand bed?

How long would that take?

Thanks

- I would start out with 400ml , you can always after a couple of weeks add some more .
removing the sand bed can be tricky , why remove ?


Thanks for the help.

The sand bed is becoming more and more ugly. Also, Nasarius snails have buried themselves and die under the sand cuz there is not enough food for them. I dont want future problems with a failing sand bed. I have alot of money spent in corals that i dont want to die. Also, it takes up alot of room and water volume.

How long should I wait for the BP to establish themselves before I pull out the sand bed?
Im using a TLF phosban reactor with 500 ml of BP. The maxijet 400 which is rated at 110GPH doesnt seem to be agitating the BP enough. Any idea how much flow would be needed in this reactor?
I would use a mj1200 nearly full blast


jmoney is offline  
Unread 02/06/2010, 02:14 PM   #677
jmoney
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: San Marcos, TX
Posts: 970
Quote:
Originally Posted by cvye View Post
I have 3 BTAs and they are doing fine. No negative reaction from any invert that I can see, including leathers. My leathers in the tank where I'm dosing sugar are not liking that at all.
I think it was a temperature thing, we have been having bizarre weather here in texas,but right now everything is looking fine, been 4 days and my water has gotten very clear, still seeing green hair algae turning kind of greyish


jmoney is offline  
Unread 02/06/2010, 04:50 PM   #678
las
Registered Member
 
las's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: chicago
Posts: 1,012
jmoney,

I just threw a random pump i had on it thats rated at 266gph....I have the valve fully open and it seems to be ok... do you know what the MJ 1200 is rated at? I realize that it would be better to have a bigger pump, so that once a week i could open it full blast and shake things up. I dont know how much flow the TLF phosban reactor can handle. Its got flimsy rubber elbow connectors on top... I dont want a leak....


las is offline  
Unread 02/07/2010, 08:40 PM   #679
sandgoby
Registered Member
 
sandgoby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 78
So about 4 weeks in now and everything looks great. The cyano that I had is practically gone. Also any algae I had in the DT is gone. I made some other mods during this time.

Added 500ml Bio Pellets in a Phosban Reactor
Swapped out T1000 skimmer for a Alpha Vertex 170
Added a cryptic fuge.

These 3 items have made a heck of a difference in the appearance of the tank.
I am running the discharge of the Bio Pellets near the Skimmer and the pickup for my stand alone Fuge. I have noticed an increase in feather dusters in the fuge. Dunno what was the major factor, maybe all 3 items but I am very happy with the results.

S

I have before and after pics below.


Attached Images
File Type: jpg Tank1.jpg (96.1 KB, 241 views)
File Type: jpg Tank2.jpg (104.6 KB, 221 views)
File Type: jpg Tank3.jpg (83.3 KB, 243 views)
sandgoby is offline  
Unread 02/07/2010, 08:52 PM   #680
stormrider27
Registered Member
 
stormrider27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Sarasota, FL
Posts: 530
/\ Congrats! I am thinking about adding a cryptic fuge,can we see a picture of yours?


stormrider27 is offline  
Unread 02/07/2010, 09:15 PM   #681
jmoney
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: San Marcos, TX
Posts: 970
Quote:
Originally Posted by las View Post
jmoney,

I just threw a random pump i had on it thats rated at 266gph....I have the valve fully open and it seems to be ok... do you know what the MJ 1200 is rated at? I realize that it would be better to have a bigger pump, so that once a week i could open it full blast and shake things up. I dont know how much flow the TLF phosban reactor can handle. Its got flimsy rubber elbow connectors on top... I dont want a leak....
i think the mj1200 is like 279 or something so that sounds close enough, and yeah I feel you on the TLF reactor thats why i switched to the brs


jmoney is offline  
Unread 02/07/2010, 09:18 PM   #682
sandgoby
Registered Member
 
sandgoby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 78
Quote:
Originally Posted by stormrider27 View Post
/\ Congrats! I am thinking about adding a cryptic fuge,can we see a picture of yours?
Thanks, Sure I'll post some pics tomorrow.

S


sandgoby is offline  
Unread 02/07/2010, 10:02 PM   #683
sandgoby
Registered Member
 
sandgoby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 78
Ah what the heck I got bored and got out the camera, I have a few pics of the setup below. Forgive the not so great quality. I'll have to get the good camera back from my daughter.

The first is an almost full sump shot.
The 2nd and 3rd are shots of the cryptic fuge. I am surprised with the all the different sponges that have grown.
The 4th pic is of the stand alone fuge. It's hard to see from the pic but the feather duster worms have really taken off.

S

The one thing I forgot to add, I think I'll start a thread on it but I am debating on adding a DSB to the Cryptic Fuge.


Attached Images
File Type: jpg sump1.jpg (56.6 KB, 231 views)
File Type: jpg Cfuge1.jpg (63.2 KB, 246 views)
File Type: jpg cfuge2.jpg (64.3 KB, 225 views)
File Type: jpg fuge1.jpg (80.4 KB, 209 views)

Last edited by sandgoby; 02/07/2010 at 10:08 PM.
sandgoby is offline  
Unread 02/08/2010, 02:44 AM   #684
alessandro
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Italy
Posts: 294
Quote:
Originally Posted by tntneon View Post
-I run the BP`s w/o GFO , i do still have a little carbon reactor (which i don`t take offline).
you will skim phosphates , i measured my skimmate few times on phosphates
and i always (i do wet skimming) produce about 2 l /week with around 2 - 3 ppm PO4 and 200 ppm NO3 in a system of 35 g.
Display reads 0.1 -0.2 ppm NO3 and PO4 always zero.


greetingzz tntneon
Hello,
Some of you dutch guys tried to use biopellets together with zeolites? experiences?


alessandro is offline  
Unread 02/08/2010, 04:38 AM   #685
recife111
Moved On
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 386
Quote:
Some of you dutch guys tried to use biopellets together with zeolites? experiences?
i have, however i doubt anything will come of it,
the zeolites will just strip more out of the water.


recife111 is offline  
Unread 02/08/2010, 05:10 PM   #686
jmoney
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: San Marcos, TX
Posts: 970
just an update its been about a week now...my water is pretty sparkling clean, but theree is still some hair algae, im assuming it will take about 4 weeks for there to start being major effects on algae...PE is still wonderful on corals


jmoney is offline  
Unread 02/08/2010, 11:40 PM   #687
BradR
Registered Member
 
BradR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Michigan
Posts: 764
Blog Entries: 1
Anyone care to guesstimate how many liters of pellets equal a daily dose 500cc vinegar w/ 1tsp sugar? (Can't say no to the hungry fish.)
It'd be nice to get the red/black stuff off the rocks in the aquarium.


BradR is offline  
Unread 02/09/2010, 08:48 AM   #688
stormrider27
Registered Member
 
stormrider27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Sarasota, FL
Posts: 530
Quote:
Originally Posted by sandgoby View Post
Ah what the heck I got bored and got out the camera, I have a few pics of the setup below. Forgive the not so great quality. I'll have to get the good camera back from my daughter.

The first is an almost full sump shot.
The 2nd and 3rd are shots of the cryptic fuge. I am surprised with the all the different sponges that have grown.
The 4th pic is of the stand alone fuge. It's hard to see from the pic but the feather duster worms have really taken off.

S

The one thing I forgot to add, I think I'll start a thread on it but I am debating on adding a DSB to the Cryptic Fuge.
Thanks for posting the pics!


stormrider27 is offline  
Unread 02/09/2010, 09:02 AM   #689
montrealreef
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Posts: 217
am I the only one who has not had good results with these?

It's been almost 8 weeks and the only thing I've noticed is that my pH now runs at 7.6-7.8 instead of 8.0 to 8.2 (and yes the output is right next to my skimmers intake) so hopefully that means that there are bacteria growing on them ( either that or the pellets are dissolving and releasing acid into the water). I still need the same dose of vodka. Whenever I try to decrease the vodka dosing a little bit, my nitrate and phosphate spike and I get tons of cyanobacteria.

I'm going to give them another 2 weeks. If no appreciable benefit by then, I will toss them in the garbage. I think that I have just wasted 130 dollars... wish I had bought a doser instead.



Last edited by montrealreef; 02/09/2010 at 09:09 AM.
montrealreef is offline  
Unread 02/09/2010, 11:02 AM   #690
jmoney
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: San Marcos, TX
Posts: 970
Quote:
Originally Posted by BradR View Post
Anyone care to guesstimate how many liters of pellets equal a daily dose 500cc vinegar w/ 1tsp sugar? (Can't say no to the hungry fish.)
It'd be nice to get the red/black stuff off the rocks in the aquarium.
I don't think it works like that, you cannot overdose the pellets so it would be however many liters of pellets to total system volume, and some people still choose to do other carbon dosing on top of it


jmoney is offline  
Unread 02/09/2010, 01:43 PM   #691
tntneon
SPSahollic
 
tntneon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: terneuzen , netherlands
Posts: 875
Quote:
Originally Posted by montrealreef View Post
am I the only one who has not had good results with these?

It's been almost 8 weeks and the only thing I've noticed is that my pH now runs at 7.6-7.8 instead of 8.0 to 8.2 (and yes the output is right next to my skimmers intake) so hopefully that means that there are bacteria growing on them ( either that or the pellets are dissolving and releasing acid into the water). I still need the same dose of vodka. Whenever I try to decrease the vodka dosing a little bit, my nitrate and phosphate spike and I get tons of cyanobacteria.

I'm going to give them another 2 weeks. If no appreciable benefit by then, I will toss them in the garbage. I think that I have just wasted 130 dollars... wish I had bought a doser instead.
-I`m sad to hear that montrealreef
How was the situation before you got started with BP`s, did you have high nitrates, did it decrease or not ?
At first i also saw cyano taking over the GHA who was already present , then slowly starting to move out with the GHA as well .
But i have to say i`m starting to have a little bit of cyano again , maybe i already have to replace half of them (i`m already using them for 5 to 6 month`s).
I don`t see any spikes in nitrates or phophates.

greetingzz tntneon


__________________
May the flow be with you !

Current Tank Info: 154 G SPS dominated + 25 G sump ; lighting : 210 W LED XPG/XRE (sunrise) + 150 W T5 (bl+ , 15°K , fiji , bl+) ; skimmer : Royal Exclusive supermarine 200 ; BM 3-Ch dosing pump (CA/ ALk and top-off) ; tunze 6085 circulation
tntneon is offline  
Unread 02/09/2010, 01:46 PM   #692
tntneon
SPSahollic
 
tntneon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: terneuzen , netherlands
Posts: 875
Quote:
Originally Posted by sandgoby View Post
So about 4 weeks in now and everything looks great. The cyano that I had is practically gone. Also any algae I had in the DT is gone. I made some other mods during this time.

Added 500ml Bio Pellets in a Phosban Reactor
Swapped out T1000 skimmer for a Alpha Vertex 170
Added a cryptic fuge.

These 3 items have made a heck of a difference in the appearance of the tank.
I am running the discharge of the Bio Pellets near the Skimmer and the pickup for my stand alone Fuge. I have noticed an increase in feather dusters in the fuge. Dunno what was the major factor, maybe all 3 items but I am very happy with the results.

S

I have before and after pics below.
-That`s a real improvement
I also notice a increasing number of feather dusters just above the level of the pellets in my sump

greetingzz tntneon


__________________
May the flow be with you !

Current Tank Info: 154 G SPS dominated + 25 G sump ; lighting : 210 W LED XPG/XRE (sunrise) + 150 W T5 (bl+ , 15°K , fiji , bl+) ; skimmer : Royal Exclusive supermarine 200 ; BM 3-Ch dosing pump (CA/ ALk and top-off) ; tunze 6085 circulation
tntneon is offline  
Unread 02/09/2010, 08:36 PM   #693
sandgoby
Registered Member
 
sandgoby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 78
Quote:
Originally Posted by montrealreef View Post
am I the only one who has not had good results with these?

It's been almost 8 weeks and the only thing I've noticed is that my pH now runs at 7.6-7.8 instead of 8.0 to 8.2 (and yes the output is right next to my skimmers intake) so hopefully that means that there are bacteria growing on them ( either that or the pellets are dissolving and releasing acid into the water). I still need the same dose of vodka. Whenever I try to decrease the vodka dosing a little bit, my nitrate and phosphate spike and I get tons of cyanobacteria.

I'm going to give them another 2 weeks. If no appreciable benefit by then, I will toss them in the garbage. I think that I have just wasted 130 dollars... wish I had bought a doser instead.
Hey Montrealreef,
Could we get a little more info and recent history on your setup? No experience here with carbon dosing but I don't believe that running the bio pellets and dosing at the same time is a good idea. I have read that some have noticed a spike in Nitrates after the initial switch to the pellets and then it drops. But more info I believe would help here.

S


sandgoby is offline  
Unread 02/09/2010, 10:50 PM   #694
BradR
Registered Member
 
BradR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Michigan
Posts: 764
Blog Entries: 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmoney View Post
I don't think it works like that, you cannot overdose the pellets so it would be however many liters of pellets to total system volume, and some people still choose to do other carbon dosing on top of it
I see. Thanks!


BradR is offline  
Unread 02/10/2010, 12:29 AM   #695
solos2
Moved On
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 214
Update:

After adding agaronite sand (50-100g suger grain sized and 50g 2-3mm pellet sized) to the NPBP reactor, everything seems to be in working order. NO3/PO4 continues to be zero but it may take a while before I can identify if adding aragonite sand will actually improve its performance.



Video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FOfbenfUGog


solos2 is offline  
Unread 02/10/2010, 03:54 AM   #696
tntneon
SPSahollic
 
tntneon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: terneuzen , netherlands
Posts: 875
Quote:
Originally Posted by solos2 View Post
Update:

After adding agaronite sand (50-100g suger grain sized and 50g 2-3mm pellet sized) to the NPBP reactor, everything seems to be in working order. NO3/PO4 continues to be zero but it may take a while before I can identify if adding aragonite sand will actually improve its performance.



Video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FOfbenfUGog
-Nice set-up you have
Do you already use a calciumreactor ,to maitain Ca and carbonates ?
If not , do you measure any difference in the Ca and alkinity levels after adding the aragonite ?
Something i`m very curious at
If you see any increassement in Ca or alkinity , i think i`m gonna try it to.
Now i have to dose sometimes 2 times a day (liquid) Ca and alkinity to maintain the propper levels , would be nice if i could easely reduce that a littlle bit

greetingzz tntneon


__________________
May the flow be with you !

Current Tank Info: 154 G SPS dominated + 25 G sump ; lighting : 210 W LED XPG/XRE (sunrise) + 150 W T5 (bl+ , 15°K , fiji , bl+) ; skimmer : Royal Exclusive supermarine 200 ; BM 3-Ch dosing pump (CA/ ALk and top-off) ; tunze 6085 circulation
tntneon is offline  
Unread 02/10/2010, 04:01 AM   #697
solos2
Moved On
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 214
I'm dosing kalkwasser to maintain ca/kh right now, and I really doubt the calcium from the dissolved aragonite is gonna be significant or detectable, I did notice some sand have gone missing after a few days, but I cannot conclude if they're really dissolved or simply blown out of the reactor by the water flow.

I did notice a stronger smell from the reactor, however, perhaps the bacteria population inside the reactor indeed increased a lot, but I'll need more time to observe the tank to identify if there's really a difference.




solos2 is offline  
Unread 02/10/2010, 07:40 AM   #698
cvye
Reefer
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: RI
Posts: 344
Quote:
Originally Posted by montrealreef View Post

I'm going to give them another 2 weeks. If no appreciable benefit by then, I will toss them in the garbage. I think that I have just wasted 130 dollars... wish I had bought a doser instead.
Send them to me, I'll gladly pay shipping charges. Best thing I've done for my reef in a long time. I'll be putting them on my small tank when I get the chance.


cvye is offline  
Unread 02/10/2010, 11:39 AM   #699
jmoney
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: San Marcos, TX
Posts: 970
also you may want to check if you have enough pellets or water is running through the pellets sufficiently, Mine are flat out churning in their reactor


jmoney is offline  
Unread 02/10/2010, 12:36 PM   #700
tatuvaaj
Pro-Protozoa
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Tampere, Finland
Posts: 1,228
It has been a long time since my previous "report" so here goes

I updated the amount of NPBs to 5 liters (!) and results have been excellent. Nitrates are dropping close to zero (first time since starting this tank) and water is crystal clear. Without NPBs or DOC dosing nitrate raises quickly to 25+ ppm.

The amount of nuisance algae is also clearly dropping, despite iron dosing. I still use GFO but the amount needed has decreased significantly (from 2000 to less than 500 ml). It also seems that NBPs are able to reduce CDOM as the frequency I need to replace GAC is reduced.

I continue to use open canister setup with relatively slow water velocity. This setup seems to work better than fluidizing filter in my case. My "reactor" is simply an old 10 liter GAC bucket:



Overall I'm very happy with NP-Biopellets and will continue to use them. Initially I thought they might be bit too expensive but after making some calculations it became clear that they are a lot cheaper than running a refugium.


__________________
Tatu Vaajalahti
Tampere, Finland

Current Tank Info: 240 gal + 50 gal sump,SDSB,LR,ATB Medium, 2x250W HQI + actinic,Balling
tatuvaaj is offline  
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:21 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Powered by Searchlight © 2025 Axivo Inc.
Use of this web site is subject to the terms and conditions described in the user agreement.
Reef CentralTM Reef Central, LLC. Copyright ©1999-2022
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.