Reef Central Online Community

Go Back   Reef Central Online Community > General Interest Forums > New to the Hobby
Blogs FAQ Calendar

Notices

User Tag List

Reply
Thread Tools
Unread 02/14/2009, 10:49 PM   #51
hamiltonguy
Registered Member
 
hamiltonguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Posts: 906
Yeah I was thinking the same thing scarr_11. I think it'd be better if you just take out the baffle dividing the sump and the skimmer section. That way you can stretch out other chambers as Jason stated.


__________________
Knowledge, the only thing that's cheap in this hobby.

Current Tank Info: 75G, RO NW-150 Skimmer, MP40W, MP20, 48" 4x54W TEK light, Mag 9.5, TLF 150 Bio Pellet Reactor, JBJ ATO
hamiltonguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02/14/2009, 10:59 PM   #52
Aquarist007
Registered Member
 
Aquarist007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Hamilton, Canada
Posts: 28,240
Blog Entries: 1







__________________
I prefer my substrates stirred but not shaken

Current Tank Info: 150gal long mixed reef, 90gal sump, 60 gal refugium with 200 lbs live rock
Aquarist007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02/15/2009, 01:52 PM   #53
Whys
Moved On
 
Whys's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 3,263
That is a clean layout Capn. Especially considering everything you have going on there. Extensive, yet practical.


Whys is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02/15/2009, 09:21 PM   #54
Aquarist007
Registered Member
 
Aquarist007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Hamilton, Canada
Posts: 28,240
Blog Entries: 1
Quote:
Originally posted by Whys
That is a clean layout Capn. Especially considering everything you have going on there. Extensive, yet practical.
thanks whys


__________________
I prefer my substrates stirred but not shaken

Current Tank Info: 150gal long mixed reef, 90gal sump, 60 gal refugium with 200 lbs live rock
Aquarist007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02/15/2009, 09:49 PM   #55
hamiltonguy
Registered Member
 
hamiltonguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Posts: 906
I agree, definitely well set up.

What are the adv/disadv of having a separate sump and fuge?


__________________
Knowledge, the only thing that's cheap in this hobby.

Current Tank Info: 75G, RO NW-150 Skimmer, MP40W, MP20, 48" 4x54W TEK light, Mag 9.5, TLF 150 Bio Pellet Reactor, JBJ ATO
hamiltonguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02/15/2009, 10:03 PM   #56
Aquarist007
Registered Member
 
Aquarist007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Hamilton, Canada
Posts: 28,240
Blog Entries: 1
Quote:
Originally posted by hamiltonguy
I agree, definitely well set up.

What are the adv/disadv of having a separate sump and fuge?
no disadvantages---just alot of people are not lucky enough to have the space to run them separately

advantages:
adds more water to the water column
a deep sand bed can be run remotely from the display tank and easily maintained
some reefers prefer to run chaeto by itself with a bare bottom fuge--allows easier cleaning of the debris
easier to control the flows individually to each area.
sump is easier to clean

to name a few


__________________
I prefer my substrates stirred but not shaken

Current Tank Info: 150gal long mixed reef, 90gal sump, 60 gal refugium with 200 lbs live rock
Aquarist007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02/23/2009, 11:59 PM   #57
hamiltonguy
Registered Member
 
hamiltonguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Posts: 906
Bump

I know this is a delayed reply but I completely forgot about this thread.

So capn, if you have separate tanks for a sump and a fuge, would you still use one return pump or would you need one for the sump and the return?


__________________
Knowledge, the only thing that's cheap in this hobby.

Current Tank Info: 75G, RO NW-150 Skimmer, MP40W, MP20, 48" 4x54W TEK light, Mag 9.5, TLF 150 Bio Pellet Reactor, JBJ ATO
hamiltonguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02/24/2009, 01:33 AM   #58
Uselesstool
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Simi Valley
Posts: 13
Playa, I really like your setup and am considering doing something similar for my next sump setup. I have a question though, and maybe you can clarify the reasoning. Wouldnt it be more beneficial to have the water from the tank first hit the Chaeto -> Bubble Trap -> Skimmer -> Bubble Trap #2 -> Water Pump back to Tank.

I guess it seems the water is going through more of the filtration process rather than going through either or. Maybe I'm just a retard?

Thanks


Uselesstool is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02/24/2009, 02:40 AM   #59
Whys
Moved On
 
Whys's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 3,263
Uselesstool, I have the setup you describe with a separate slow-flow to the fuge. This works for me, in part because I have a small system with a skimmer that is "gentle on pods". But some like to have a center return so that pods coming out of the fuge don't get eaten by the skimmer. I assume this is more important with larger skimmers, like Playa's.

Just a note... there is some debate as to whether or not the return pump is gentle on pods. I agree with the school of thought that says 90% of anything visible to the naked eye will be killed by the pressure and shearing forces of an impeller pump. At some point, I'd like to gather ten amphipods from my sock, direct my pump return into a bucket, and run some empirical tests to solve this matter once and for all.


Whys is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02/24/2009, 10:13 AM   #60
hamiltonguy
Registered Member
 
hamiltonguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Posts: 906
The reason alot of people don't have their drain directly into the fuge is because of the force of the water coming down the drain. This prevents proper growth of pods (or so I've heard/read). For this reason many people have a drain into the fuge or skimmer section BUT it's tee'd off to control flow, i.e. if the drain is coming down into the fuge, there would be a ball valve after the T splitting the line to the skimmer section (like in Playa's diagram) to which most of the water would be directed. I believe you're suppose to split it 75%-> skimmer and 25%-> fuge.
I hope I answered that correctly. Feel free to add anything I missed.


__________________
Knowledge, the only thing that's cheap in this hobby.

Current Tank Info: 75G, RO NW-150 Skimmer, MP40W, MP20, 48" 4x54W TEK light, Mag 9.5, TLF 150 Bio Pellet Reactor, JBJ ATO
hamiltonguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02/27/2009, 05:11 PM   #61
Salt_in_MyBlood
Registered Member
 
Salt_in_MyBlood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 76
A great place to buy parts like bulkheads and that sort of thing is TSC or Princess Auto. good prices and you can see exactly what you are getting


__________________
New Tank setups should be covered under the renovation tax credit.... hahaha
Salt_in_MyBlood is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03/15/2009, 10:14 PM   #62
hamiltonguy
Registered Member
 
hamiltonguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Posts: 906
Bump.

I noticed some questions about sumps lately and was hoping this thread might help others out.


__________________
Knowledge, the only thing that's cheap in this hobby.

Current Tank Info: 75G, RO NW-150 Skimmer, MP40W, MP20, 48" 4x54W TEK light, Mag 9.5, TLF 150 Bio Pellet Reactor, JBJ ATO
hamiltonguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:24 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Powered by Searchlight © 2025 Axivo Inc.
Use of this web site is subject to the terms and conditions described in the user agreement.
Reef CentralTM Reef Central, LLC. Copyright ©1999-2022
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.