Reef Central Online Community

Go Back   Reef Central Online Community > General Interest Forums > Lighting, Filtration & Other Equipment
Blogs FAQ Calendar

Notices

User Tag List

Reply
Thread Tools
Unread 07/22/2007, 12:02 PM   #1
Ironfan
Registered Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 31
Aquactinics Solar Flare or Sfiligoi Stealth 12x54w T5?

Tank is going to be 96L x 48W x 30H. I am planning a 4-5 inch sand bed. that will leave me with approx. 24-25 inches to light. I plan to place the lights down the width of the tank. I would need 6 Solar Flare @ $800.00/each or 4 Sfiligoi Stealth 12x54w T5 @ $1500.00/each. I would get more light with the Sfiligoi Stealth. Any one with any thoughts on which I should choose? I really would like to stay away from Metal Halides if possible. I also do want to be able to keep SPS and clams. Any input would be appreciated.


Ironfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07/22/2007, 12:07 PM   #2
kodyboy
Moved On
 
kodyboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 2,990
I would think four solar flares would be more than enough light for that size aquarium.


kodyboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07/22/2007, 01:55 PM   #3
aninjaatemyshoe
Registered Member
 
aninjaatemyshoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 2,333
T5s would not be my pick for an aquarium that size. I would say you'd be better off with a setup of 4-5 400W MHs on Luminarcs.


__________________
You are not brought upon this world to "get it"
aninjaatemyshoe is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07/22/2007, 02:08 PM   #4
kodyboy
Moved On
 
kodyboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 2,990
T5s or MH would work fine, but you do need a LOT of t5s for that tank!


kodyboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07/22/2007, 02:13 PM   #5
Ironfan
Registered Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 31
I dont want this thread to be another T5 vs MH argument. I dont want to use MH. I would only need to penetrate 25inch of water.


Ironfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07/22/2007, 02:31 PM   #6
reef / aholic
Registered Member
 
reef / aholic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: houston | texas
Posts: 647
I can not find anybody doing this - 30"H with SPS. I have been wanting to try this also.

96"L x 48"W x 30"H = 598g x 5w = 2,990w

1. 4 Sfiligoi Stealth 12x54w T5 = 2,592w
$6,000.00

2. 6 Solar Flare 6 x 54w @ 85w = 3,060w
$4,800.00

3. 8 - Luminarc III with 400w MH = 3,200w
$1,500.00 + 4 - 2x400 Ballast = $980.00 = $2,480.00

Chiller a 3/4hp or 1hp chiller = $1,500.00

Luminarc and Chiller = $3,980.00


reef / aholic is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07/22/2007, 03:39 PM   #7
Aquactinics
Registered Member
 
Aquactinics's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: North Haven, CT
Posts: 656
Ironfan,

Why would you need 6 Solar Flares? 4 is more then enough for a tank that size.

Tom
Aquactinics


Aquactinics is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07/22/2007, 03:49 PM   #8
Ironfan
Registered Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 31
Well, I am just not as educated on lighting as most. I took the width of the fixture 15 inches and divided into 96 inches and i got 6.4 fixtures. Lighting is the hardest decision I have had to make so far in my plan for this tank design. I dont want to mess with metal halides unless I have no other choice due to increased electric cost, more equipment and so on.


Ironfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07/22/2007, 03:52 PM   #9
djc1026
Registered Member
 
djc1026's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Lawton
Posts: 1,061
I think you went the wrong way on your math . 2 48"ers for the length of the tank and you could do two rows at 30 wide, equallying 4 fixtures is all you can physically fit on that tank.

Dave


__________________
Dave

Current Tank Info: 150 gallon FOWLR -- 29 Gal Misc
djc1026 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07/22/2007, 04:08 PM   #10
glassbox-design
Registered Member
 
glassbox-design's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: SF
Posts: 3,041
i believe money is not that big of a concern, given the nature of the post...with that in mind i would certainly go with sfiliogi.

they are very attractive fixtures and well designed....very sleek and would look great as pendants...honestly it would be a shame to hide them behind a canopy.

jmo.

eric


__________________
GLASSBOXDESIGN
the modern reef blog

LEDs are a 50,000 hr investment. Choose wisely.

Current Tank Info: ...a new glassbox is coming
glassbox-design is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07/22/2007, 04:13 PM   #11
Tagareef
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Boulder, CO
Posts: 904
Ironfan,

Here is a 30" deep tank lit by 16x80w normally driven T5's. Tank belongs to Regina (I hope she doesn't mind me posting her beautiful reef!)



I've recently installed a 72" Aquatinics Constellation that replaced 3x250w/2x150w DE metal halides in a AquaSpacelight fixture. I love it so far and the corals aren't complaining either. My reef is 24" deep and the fixture is suspended 3".

Before you seriously consider anything made by Sfiligoi, do a search and read how this company handles customer service and warranty issues. It's sad that a company that makes high-end lighting fixtures can't back their own products. (Here in the US anyway)

Luis


Tagareef is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07/22/2007, 04:56 PM   #12
Ironfan
Registered Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 31
So I should place the fixtures 2x2 down the legnth of the tank or 1x4 down the width of the tank?
so like this:
across 96 inches horizontal
3 4
1 2

or

48 inches depth vertical
1 2 3 4


Ironfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07/22/2007, 05:13 PM   #13
kodyboy
Moved On
 
kodyboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 2,990
I don't think it would matter either way, but since you tank is 48" wide (very jealous here) maybe sideways would be better to vent the heat out the back of the tank? Not sure, ask Tom as Aquactincs he will tell you.


kodyboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07/22/2007, 05:16 PM   #14
Ironfan
Registered Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 31
tank isnt a reality yet, but plans are in the works.


Ironfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07/22/2007, 05:47 PM   #15
purebullet417
Rimless Reef Club
 
purebullet417's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: long island ny
Posts: 1,509
i would say this way if you can
1 2 3 4


__________________
My 57 Gallon Rimless Build Thread
http://www.reefcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?t=2341582

Current Tank Info: 57 Gallon Rimless
purebullet417 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07/22/2007, 06:08 PM   #16
djc1026
Registered Member
 
djc1026's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Lawton
Posts: 1,061
I guess I did the math wrong too, actually didn't pay attention to the tank measurements. I would do the 1234 centered every 2 foot. That gives you 9" between fixtures and they vent out the back or front. Horizontally, they would be end to end, thus likely to effect the ventilation.

That's my .02

Dave


__________________
Dave

Current Tank Info: 150 gallon FOWLR -- 29 Gal Misc
djc1026 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:05 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Powered by Searchlight © 2025 Axivo Inc.
Use of this web site is subject to the terms and conditions described in the user agreement.
Reef CentralTM Reef Central, LLC. Copyright ©1999-2022
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.