![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 485
|
DSB in sump, effective?
Hi guys,
I got a new kent marine phos reactor to take care of my phosphates. I need a way to limit nitrates besides husbandry. My fuge area is 20% of my display tank volume. What would be my best option for nitrate control? My two options would be: 1) Harvest Macro Algae in the fuge area 2) Implement a 6"DSB in the fuge area I cannot do both as my baffles are only 8" tall. What would you guys pick? With option 1 it will be more expensive due to usage of lights, electricity etc. Is option 2 even viable given that my fuge area where the DSB will go is 20% of my display tank volume? I know the bigger the fuge/dsb the better, so what are your thoughts? Cheers |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Premium Member
![]() Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 3,646
|
Personally I have both macro and RDSB. I find the RDSB does more for the nitrates than the macro. The problem with RDSB is that you CAN NOT disturb it, otherwise bad things happen.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 485
|
More replies pls.
Tnx Pmolan. The RDSB will be left alone as it will be in my sump. BTW, my display is 55G, my fuge area is 11G. That's 20% volume. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|