Reef Central Online Community

Go Back   Reef Central Online Community > General Interest Forums > Lighting, Filtration & Other Equipment
Blogs FAQ Calendar

Notices

User Tag List

Reply
Thread Tools
Unread 07/09/2008, 10:01 AM   #1
itswayner
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 61
Chiller Flow Rate?

Is it more efficient to run more flow through a chiller or less? I have the JBJ 1/10 HP chiller and the min/max is 240/960 according to drsfostersmith.com. That is a huge range.

Currently I am running it at the low end (270ish) and it seems to work ok but I was wondering if it would cool faster with more flow? Or does the slower flow allow the chiller to cool the water more?


itswayner is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07/09/2008, 10:24 AM   #2
lvreefer
Registered Member
 
lvreefer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Sin City
Posts: 1,163
I choose to run chillers at the high end of the flow rate. The reason is that i would rather have cool water flowing out of the return vs. ice water.
The only way to truly test the efficiency would be to montior the usage (Kill A Watt).


lvreefer is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07/09/2008, 11:36 AM   #3
Txmeta_b
Registered Member
 
Txmeta_b's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Houston TX
Posts: 6
good point, it's probably less shocking to your tank inhabitants if you have a small deltaT at the chiller/return outlet.
You don't want to generate a cold side and a hot side,since no matter how good your circulation is you'll have a temperature differential in the tank when the chiller is on.

In terms of power/work the chiller has to do,it will be pretty much the same,but the outlet temp will be linearly increase with the flow through the chiller.


Txmeta_b is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07/09/2008, 11:44 AM   #4
itswayner
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 61
I run my chiller in my sump (input from one end of sump output on the other) so the temperature differential in the tank would be minimal since it is mixing with fresh tank water constantly?

Is that the proper way to hook up the chiller? Or should it be running directly to the tank?


itswayner is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07/09/2008, 12:02 PM   #5
Jefe12234
Registered Member
 
Jefe12234's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: MN
Posts: 885
Quote:
Originally posted by itswayner
I run my chiller in my sump (input from one end of sump output on the other) so the temperature differential in the tank would be minimal since it is mixing with fresh tank water constantly?

Is that the proper way to hook up the chiller? Or should it be running directly to the tank?
Well it's more efficient to run the chiller with the return pump so that you don't need a separate pump for it. And I'd guess that chillers only cool the water by a few degrees at most. I've put my hand in front of the return line when it's running and you can't feel much of a temperature difference, so I wouldn't be concerned about running it straight into the display tank. That's how most people do it.


__________________
Serenity now!!!
Jefe12234 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07/09/2008, 12:05 PM   #6
Txmeta_b
Registered Member
 
Txmeta_b's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Houston TX
Posts: 6
QUOTE : I run my chiller in my sump (input from one end of sump output on the other) so the temperature differential in the tank would be minimal since it is mixing with fresh tank water constantly?

Is that the proper way to hook up the chiller? Or should it be running directly to the tank? /QUOTE

I don't really like that setup since you're feeding back the cold outlet stream (at least partially) back in the chiller,which could freeze the stream when you get a low flow condition in the sump.
I'd recommend to have the outlet of the chiller back in a high current area of the tank for quick mixing.


Txmeta_b is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07/09/2008, 12:24 PM   #7
itswayner
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 61
Good point about the return. I probably should have just gotten a larger return pump and run it through there. I'll probably do that when I do my upgrade in a few months (55G->90G).


itswayner is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:39 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Powered by Searchlight © 2025 Axivo Inc.
Use of this web site is subject to the terms and conditions described in the user agreement.
Reef CentralTM Reef Central, LLC. Copyright ©1999-2022
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.