Reef Central Online Community

Go Back   Reef Central Online Community > General Interest Forums > Reef Discussion
Blogs FAQ Calendar

Notices

User Tag List

Reply
Thread Tools
Unread 01/08/2009, 09:23 AM   #1
da1jewfish
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: West Palm, FL
Posts: 990
skimmer footprints, why so big?

All of these skimmers I'm looking at have large footprints... all of them seem to. For example, most of the in-sump minimum footprint is 8" X 10" for the Octo Extreme 160, then it goes up to 11.5" X 13.5" footprint, etc.
My question is do they really take up that much room in the sump?
That is a lot of room. I have 3 tanks with sumps/ fuges and none of my sumps have enough room to accomodate unless I removed the Chaeto, which I don't want to do.

Any ideas?


da1jewfish is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01/08/2009, 10:36 AM   #2
asmujica
Registered Member
 
asmujica's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Monterrey, México
Posts: 5,580
Try an external or have you looked at the tunze skimmers?


__________________
Where has the tank gone?
asmujica is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01/08/2009, 11:21 AM   #3
m8j4c
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Livermore, Ca.
Posts: 69
+1 on trying an external skimmer!
But I have to agree that in sump skimmers do have a rather large footprint. I had some issues trying to find one that worked in my sump as well.


m8j4c is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01/08/2009, 11:56 AM   #4
seapug
Registered Member
 
seapug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: 4980 ft.
Posts: 7,954
Blog Entries: 1
Tunze 9015 footprint is only about 4" X 5" and is good up to about 400 gallons.

http://www.marinedepot.com/ps_Aquari...o_classic.html


__________________
insert clever saying here.

Current Tank Info: 200 gallon custom Marineland DD peninsular tank. LPS dominated mixed reef. Previous 90 gallon mixed reef TOTM April 2009.
seapug is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01/08/2009, 01:13 PM   #5
nikon187
Registered Member
 
nikon187's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Edmonton Alberta
Posts: 4,717
yes most in sump skimmers have a large footprint..The 2 smallest ones are the tunze as mentioned above and the bubbleking mini with a footprint of 8" X 8"


__________________
-----------------

Current Tanks:


New 210 custom 84 x 24 x 24, 60g sump, SWC 250 extreme with bubble blaster 5000, 2 vortech mp40, 2 vortech mp10, 12 T5, Water blaster 5000, warner marine bio pellets,

60g clownfish cube, red carpet anemone with a 25g sump,SRO octopus 1000sss, 250w radium, lumenarc large.
nikon187 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01/08/2009, 02:29 PM   #6
stanlalee
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: hampton roads, va
Posts: 1,799
I notice the output pipes and pump locations on the body always seem to be offset in a way that makes takes up lots of space. they are never say 180deg from each other on a cylindrical skimmer. I always wonder if this is function over form or actually just an oversite.


stanlalee is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01/08/2009, 03:09 PM   #7
Untamed12
Registered Member
 
Untamed12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,578
I think the answer to "why"...is that sumps typically get installed below tanks, so height is an issue.

The skimmer loses effectiveness (ability to process more tank volume) as the chamber gets smaller, so if height is a concern then they make the skimmer wider.

After that, it becomes a matter of optimizing the pump placement and plumbing to save that little bit of space. More expensive skimmers consider this while others don't.


__________________
Fishlist: Tangs: Yellow, Vlamingi, Blonde Naso, Unicorn, Atlantic Blue
Others: Maroon Clown(s), Foxface, Majestic Angel, Hawkfish and more..

Current Tank Info: 400gal Envision Acrylic reef started 04/07
Untamed12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01/08/2009, 08:14 PM   #8
da1jewfish
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: West Palm, FL
Posts: 990
Ok, thanks for all the comments all. The Tunze's look nice, but a little too steep on pricing.

Are the HOB skimmers that uses the Sicce's the better ones?


da1jewfish is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01/08/2009, 08:57 PM   #9
d2mini
Registered Member
 
d2mini's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 10,344
Quote:
Originally posted by nikon187
yes most in sump skimmers have a large footprint..The 2 smallest ones are the tunze as mentioned above and the bubbleking mini with a footprint of 8" X 8"
OMG. Bubbleking REALLY likes their skimmers.


d2mini is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01/08/2009, 09:54 PM   #10
shag26272
Registered Member
 
shag26272's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: New Orleans, LA
Posts: 3,088
DAS, you can run it external


__________________
.
shag26272 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:02 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Powered by Searchlight © 2025 Axivo Inc.
Use of this web site is subject to the terms and conditions described in the user agreement.
Reef CentralTM Reef Central, LLC. Copyright ©1999-2022
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.