![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: West Palm, FL
Posts: 990
|
skimmer footprints, why so big?
All of these skimmers I'm looking at have large footprints... all of them seem to. For example, most of the in-sump minimum footprint is 8" X 10" for the Octo Extreme 160, then it goes up to 11.5" X 13.5" footprint, etc.
My question is do they really take up that much room in the sump? That is a lot of room. I have 3 tanks with sumps/ fuges and none of my sumps have enough room to accomodate unless I removed the Chaeto, which I don't want to do. Any ideas? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Monterrey, México
Posts: 5,580
|
Try an external or have you looked at the tunze skimmers?
__________________
Where has the tank gone? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Livermore, Ca.
Posts: 69
|
+1 on trying an external skimmer!
But I have to agree that in sump skimmers do have a rather large footprint. I had some issues trying to find one that worked in my sump as well. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Registered Member
![]() |
Tunze 9015 footprint is only about 4" X 5" and is good up to about 400 gallons.
http://www.marinedepot.com/ps_Aquari...o_classic.html
__________________
insert clever saying here. Current Tank Info: 200 gallon custom Marineland DD peninsular tank. LPS dominated mixed reef. Previous 90 gallon mixed reef TOTM April 2009. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Edmonton Alberta
Posts: 4,717
|
yes most in sump skimmers have a large footprint..The 2 smallest ones are the tunze as mentioned above and the bubbleking mini with a footprint of 8" X 8"
__________________
----------------- Current Tanks: New 210 custom 84 x 24 x 24, 60g sump, SWC 250 extreme with bubble blaster 5000, 2 vortech mp40, 2 vortech mp10, 12 T5, Water blaster 5000, warner marine bio pellets, 60g clownfish cube, red carpet anemone with a 25g sump,SRO octopus 1000sss, 250w radium, lumenarc large. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: hampton roads, va
Posts: 1,799
|
I notice the output pipes and pump locations on the body always seem to be offset in a way that makes takes up lots of space. they are never say 180deg from each other on a cylindrical skimmer. I always wonder if this is function over form or actually just an oversite.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,578
|
I think the answer to "why"...is that sumps typically get installed below tanks, so height is an issue.
The skimmer loses effectiveness (ability to process more tank volume) as the chamber gets smaller, so if height is a concern then they make the skimmer wider. After that, it becomes a matter of optimizing the pump placement and plumbing to save that little bit of space. More expensive skimmers consider this while others don't.
__________________
Fishlist: Tangs: Yellow, Vlamingi, Blonde Naso, Unicorn, Atlantic Blue Others: Maroon Clown(s), Foxface, Majestic Angel, Hawkfish and more.. Current Tank Info: 400gal Envision Acrylic reef started 04/07 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: West Palm, FL
Posts: 990
|
Ok, thanks for all the comments all. The Tunze's look nice, but a little too steep on pricing.
Are the HOB skimmers that uses the Sicce's the better ones? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Registered Member
![]() Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 10,344
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: New Orleans, LA
Posts: 3,088
|
DAS, you can run it external
__________________
. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|