![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 494
|
Octopus NWB 200 Vs. Extreme 200
are you paying the extra money for the Octopus Extreme for the energy efficiency? i'm looking to buy either one but energy effeciency isn't my main concern. does any one know if their skimming performance is the same?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: hell, delaware
Posts: 628
|
the octpus extreme has a muh better design and a muuuch better pump on it. the extreme uses less restrictive plumbing on it, the nw has small size plumbing on it. also jeff over at msx told me the new funnel neck design is crap on the new nws or dnws
i have a recirculating 150 and i wish i had gotten the extreme, but i need a external skimmer |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 494
|
thanks, the extreme 200 is the pump im leaning toward anyways. i just wanted to make sure i wasn't paying the extra bucks for energy efficiency.
anyone else have an input on this?
__________________
-Jordan- Current Tank Info: 90RR mixed reef |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: California
Posts: 87
|
I have the extreme 200 with PPW. Very happy!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Registered Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: central illinois
Posts: 630
|
funnel neck crap? you are not referring to the cone transition neck right? that is what most of them are moving too, and i love my cone transition on my octo extreme 250. if you are referring to the flimsy black funnel thing, yea they are junk. but, again, coralvue is phasing them out.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 494
|
tpenn187, which "funnel Neck Crap" are you referring too? do they put a funnel neck on the new octo extreme 200?
__________________
-Jordan- Current Tank Info: 90RR mixed reef |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 494
|
what about the recirculating octopus 200? which of the tree you think would be the best investment?
__________________
-Jordan- Current Tank Info: 90RR mixed reef |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
-Aidan's Daddy.
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Vallejo, CA
Posts: 779
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
T3am Zissou
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Galactic Sector ZZ9 Plural Z Alpha
Posts: 1,123
|
Re: Octopus NWB 200 Vs. Extreme 200
Quote:
The SWC extreme 200 is probably twice the power of the regular octopus nw-200, no comparison in that area, also, the OTP pump that comes with the regular octo nw-200 is not anywhere near the quality of the sicce that comes with the extreme. so, in a nutshell, the octopus nw-200 (2009 version) $234 for about 700lph of air @ about 50-60 watts with crappy chinese pump, and the SWC/MSX extreme 200 is $289 for 1000-1300lph of air @ 30 watts with nice italian pump. so, $55 more gets you almost double the skimming power(with mesh wheel impeller), almost half the power consumtion, and better design/build quality with the SWC extreme 200. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: hell, delaware
Posts: 628
|
well, i dont think its the funnel neck transition that is bad, but jeff said something they did with the neck screwed the design of the skimmer up. i didnt fully understand what he was saying but i dunno.
skimmy, arent the swc/msx and octo extreme the same skimmers? i know the bodys are made by the same company. yes the extremes/msx are MUCH better than the reg octos. the octo pump sucks. if i could have gone insump i would have been all over an msx. jeff, i need a msx RECIRC!!!!!!! o ya 50-60 watts on the 200?? my 150 recirc is at 84 watts!!! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Moved On
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: At a Tea Party
Posts: 393
|
If your 150 recirc is pulling 84w you have a major prob with that pump.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|