Reef Central Online Community

Go Back   Reef Central Online Community > General Interest Forums > Reef Discussion
Blogs FAQ Calendar

Notices

User Tag List

Reply
Thread Tools
Unread 11/10/2009, 10:51 PM   #101
Regal
Registered Member
 
Regal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 90
Okay, if talking about detritus that will settle on the DSB, they why we dont put a power head, connect the ouput of power head with small pvc tubing and make a straight small hole along the pvc so the water will come out the hole and blow the detritus on the surface DSB. By doing this the substrate will always clean of detritus before the detritus sink. Is there any opinion about this ?


Regal is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 11/11/2009, 07:39 AM   #102
elegance coral
They call me EC
 
elegance coral's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: central Florida
Posts: 6,208
Quote:
Originally Posted by saf1 View Post
Thread hijack. I forget when or how long ago or by whom if truth be told but they lead me to believe they are logoon type creatures. Thus my dirtier water than say what stone type coral would live in.

At the same time if I recall I was keeping a Kole Tang. They also gave me a piece of advise that I'll never forget. Leave one side of my tank alone with whatever algae would grow because the Kole would have a natural source of food...

Oh well. Do you feed yours? Mine would catch and eat whatever floated by but really loved the silver sides. I had a pair of true percs that would actually take it pieces and they lived in my Frogspawn!
There are probably as many myths about Elegance corals as there are sand beds. Yes, they can be found in "lagoonal" type environments. They do much better in the clean environments of coral reefs. Yes, I feed mine all kinds of stuff. Even live feeder fish from time to time.

Now back to your regularly scheduled programing.


elegance coral is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 11/11/2009, 08:18 AM   #103
gman0526
Registered Member
 
gman0526's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Puerto Rico
Posts: 1,278
Quote:
Originally Posted by Regal View Post
Okay, if talking about detritus that will settle on the DSB, they why we dont put a power head, connect the ouput of power head with small pvc tubing and make a straight small hole along the pvc so the water will come out the hole and blow the detritus on the surface DSB. By doing this the substrate will always clean of detritus before the detritus sink. Is there any opinion about this ?

How will you feed the pods, worms and such microfauna that make the sandbed work in the first place? Might as well do what you're proposing and lay down a SSB just for decorative purposes much like LOJ was trying to show, not a DSB.


__________________
"If the facts don't fit the theory, change the facts." A.E.

Current Tank Info: 75 G BB tank
gman0526 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 11/11/2009, 10:15 AM   #104
LobsterOfJustice
Recovering Detritophobe
 
LobsterOfJustice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Cary, NC
Posts: 7,443
What do those detritus eaters do to make the dsb "work"? Bacteria denitrify, not pods/worms.


__________________
If it's worth doing, it's worth doing right.

I remember when zoanthids were called things like "green" and "orange" and not "reverse gorilla nipple."

Current Tank Info: 180g reef with all the bells and whistles
LobsterOfJustice is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 11/11/2009, 11:31 AM   #105
jenglish
Marquis de Carabas
 
jenglish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Evansville, IN
Posts: 2,523
Quote:
Originally Posted by Regal View Post
Okay, if talking about detritus that will settle on the DSB, they why we dont put a power head, connect the ouput of power head with small pvc tubing and make a straight small hole along the pvc so the water will come out the hole and blow the detritus on the surface DSB. By doing this the substrate will always clean of detritus before the detritus sink. Is there any opinion about this ?
This is essentially a spray bar. Some folks with rock lifts do use these to keep detritus from settling... it is not 100% though.
Quote:
Originally Posted by gman0526 View Post
How will you feed the pods, worms and such microfauna that make the sandbed work in the first place? Might as well do what you're proposing and lay down a SSB just for decorative purposes much like LOJ was trying to show, not a DSB.
If you are worried about feeding the sandbed you are sort of going about this backwards. It is always better to have poo skimmed out than relying on binding or even denitrification.
Quote:
Originally Posted by LobsterOfJustice View Post
What do those detritus eaters do to make the dsb "work"? Bacteria denitrify, not pods/worms.
Pods and worms do have a place in a DSB, despite the fact they are still pooping themselves. Critters in your DSB do a number of things: Temporarily binding in biomass, breaking down larger poop into smaller poop, and moving things deeper into the DSB faster than simple diffusion processes can. I do not worry about "feeding them" as there is plenty to eat in most systems and they are largely a carrying capacity regulated population.


__________________
Jeremy
Brown liquor never hurt anybody

“Je n'ai pas besoin de cette hypothèse" Pierre-Simon Laplace


I should want to cook him a simple meal, but I shouldn't want to cut into him, to tear the flesh, to wear the flesh, to be born unto new worlds where his flesh becomes my key.

Current Tank Info: broken and dry
jenglish is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 11/11/2009, 11:40 AM   #106
gman0526
Registered Member
 
gman0526's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Puerto Rico
Posts: 1,278
Quote:
Originally Posted by LobsterOfJustice View Post
What do those detritus eaters do to make the dsb "work"? Bacteria denitrify, not pods/worms.
Absolutely nothing, you know that, I know that, some people don't and they go out and buy "sandbed recharging kits" every now and then.

Quote:
If you are worried about feeding the sandbed you are sort of going about this backwards. It is always better to have poo skimmed out than relying on binding or even denitrification.
Quote:
Believe you me I know, but since it's so "important" for some people to have a "Dr. Shimek SB" they need to take into account the quantity of pods/worms/microfauna per square inch and those little buggers do eat you know?

DSB's are nothing but a biowaste sink that will eventually (short/long term) fill out there's no way around it.. unless nothing settles there to begin with.


__________________
"If the facts don't fit the theory, change the facts." A.E.

Current Tank Info: 75 G BB tank
gman0526 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 11/11/2009, 12:34 PM   #107
elegance coral
They call me EC
 
elegance coral's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: central Florida
Posts: 6,208
Quote:
Originally Posted by gman0526 View Post
Absolutely nothing, you know that, I know that, some people don't and they go out and buy "sandbed recharging kits" every now and then.
There are people that get it. I was beginning to have my doubts.



Quote:
Believe you me I know, but since it's so "important" for some people to have a "Dr. Shimek SB" they need to take into account the quantity of pods/worms/microfauna per square inch and those little buggers do eat you know?
And his system is still one big cesspool.

Quote:
DSB's are nothing but a biowaste sink that will eventually (short/long term) fill out there's no way around it.. unless nothing settles there to begin with.
I agree with everything you've said, but this. There is a way around it. Just syphon the sand with a gravel vac. If you keep it clean from day one, it doesn't build up problem causing biowaste.


elegance coral is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 11/11/2009, 01:43 PM   #108
jenglish
Marquis de Carabas
 
jenglish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Evansville, IN
Posts: 2,523
Quote:
Originally Posted by gman0526 View Post
Absolutely nothing, you know that, I know that, some people don't and they go out and buy "sandbed recharging kits" every now and then.
I wouldn't go so far as to say they do nothing. They do improve functionality of transport and some other benefits I mentioned earlier. But they are not the drivers of a DSB, that is functional anaerobic bacteria. I honestly don't think you could keep the critters out of a tank if you use any LR at all. I have in the past bought "detritovore kits" and I don't believe there was anymore life in those sand beds than the ones that just started dry sand with some decent LR tossed on them.


__________________
Jeremy
Brown liquor never hurt anybody

“Je n'ai pas besoin de cette hypothèse" Pierre-Simon Laplace


I should want to cook him a simple meal, but I shouldn't want to cut into him, to tear the flesh, to wear the flesh, to be born unto new worlds where his flesh becomes my key.

Current Tank Info: broken and dry
jenglish is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 11/12/2009, 04:14 PM   #109
Paul B
Premium Member
 
Paul B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Long Island NY
Posts: 15,549
I disagree with everyone about everything.
OK not really, I just wanted to read this thread and I figured after all that reading I would say something.
OK never mind.


__________________
I used to get shocked when I put my hand in my tank. Then the electric eel went dead.

Current Tank Info: 100 gal reef set up in 1971
Paul B is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 11/12/2009, 05:34 PM   #110
elegance coral
They call me EC
 
elegance coral's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: central Florida
Posts: 6,208
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul B View Post
I disagree with everyone about everything.
OK not really, I just wanted to read this thread and I figured after all that reading I would say something.
OK never mind.



elegance coral is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 11/14/2009, 04:58 PM   #111
cloak
Moved On
 
cloak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Stockton, CA
Posts: 14,854
Check out the muck. Perfect!





Last edited by cloak; 11/14/2009 at 05:08 PM.
cloak is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 11/15/2009, 06:41 AM   #112
Big E
Registered Member
 
Big E's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: South Euclid, OH
Posts: 4,281
Shimek "no touch" DSB's work as--

1. Nitrate reducer
2. Home for sand dwellling creatures/fish
3. Looks- make the tank look natural compared to the BB look

That's all they offer in my opinion. There are many ways to meet the 3 needs above. The question is do you want to deal with a DSB's shortcomings for this, or find a myriad of other ways to fill those needs without a "no touch" DSB?

They make it harder to reduce or control PO4 & that's where the biggest problem lies. If you don't vacum the bed, or have high flow to get the junk out before the bed takes it in, PO4 becomes an ever rising problem.

Something has to be done.........macro algae, PO4 removers, vodka/skimmers are fighting with the DSB for control of that PO4 producing waste. If the DSB wins you get algae/cyno problems in the display, some species of corals suffer, & the tank looks ugly.

Imo, pods/worms/critters are useless from a filtering standpoint..........they are just more bioload. If you don't have a lot of waste the critter population will be low. Lots of waste=lot of critters.

These critters are below & at the surface of the sandbed. They poop & the DSB sequesters that poop. If the critters get the decaying food/waste before the flow can pull it out you're screwed from a PO4 perspective. The dentrfying bacteria degases the nitrate, but there is no bacteria in the bed to get rid of the phosphate producing waste........ it stays there......gravity sucks.

I have no desire to argue or defend my points. Just offering my perspective based from personal experience, logical thinking, & what scientific facts I can understand.


__________________
80g Rimless Acropora System

reefcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?t=2197142&page=31

Ed

Last edited by Big E; 11/15/2009 at 06:48 AM.
Big E is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 11/15/2009, 08:45 AM   #113
Frogmanx82
Registered Member
 
Frogmanx82's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 1,515
So how deep should a sand bed be if you want to have a home for worms and nassarius snails and microbes that support a healthy pod population? I would think something in the order of 2 inches. Is 3 inches too deep. Thats what I have now. I could siphon some sand out, I'm thinking about it.


__________________
Exodus 8:2

Check my homepage for tank pics and details.

Current Tank Info: 90 gallon, 2x maxspect R420R LED, 4 Ocellaris Clowns, Yellow Eye Kole Tang, Flame Angel, Foxface Rabbitfish, Banggai Cardinals, Azure Damsel, rock flower anemone, cleaner shrimp, serpent star
Frogmanx82 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 11/15/2009, 10:13 AM   #114
Mike O'Brien
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,356
It's like a lot of these new drugs coming out lately. Sure there are a few benefits but the side effects can be worse than the original problem. LOL


Mike O'Brien is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 11/15/2009, 03:20 PM   #115
mukymuk
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Plano, TX.
Posts: 109
I think both, the pro and anti DSB camps have some valid points. Some practical and some theoretical.

Quote:
If you don't vacum the bed, or have high flow to get the junk out before the bed takes it in, PO4 becomes an ever rising problem.
The basic theoretical rebuttal (and maybe there is even experiential data to support it--I don't know) to this is that in a "good" DSB, there is no "junk" accumulation. Big stuff eats food and poops, certainly, but that's not where it stops. That waste is, in turn, is a food source for others---and so on until you end up with NO3, PO4, and CO2 that dissolves into the water.

I think in practice a lot of folks don't see the entire cycle--something gets broken along the way and some (most?) of the N+P+C, gets locked up in the sediment and remains there until the DSB gets disturbed--vacuuming, powerhead mishap, whatever.

That broken "something", is likely insufficient infauna--be it bacteria or bugs, or whatever. To me, the fundamental problem with DSB's is really in the practical definition of what they are. And by "practical" I mean "easy for the average reefer to understand and replicate".

So a lot of people have tried them, watched them fail for unknown or presumed reasons and just written them off. Fine. There's a lot to be said for practical reefkeeping. But that doesn't mean the idea isn't a good one and can't be made to work well, because the reality is a fair number of people have made the work very well.

Quote:
So how deep should a sand bed be
DSB's are generally considered to be something at least 3" in depth. I think 6" is the ideal though.


mukymuk is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:15 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Powered by Searchlight © 2025 Axivo Inc.
Use of this web site is subject to the terms and conditions described in the user agreement.
Reef CentralTM Reef Central, LLC. Copyright ©1999-2022
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.