|
11/10/2009, 10:51 PM | #101 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 90
|
Okay, if talking about detritus that will settle on the DSB, they why we dont put a power head, connect the ouput of power head with small pvc tubing and make a straight small hole along the pvc so the water will come out the hole and blow the detritus on the surface DSB. By doing this the substrate will always clean of detritus before the detritus sink. Is there any opinion about this ?
|
11/11/2009, 07:39 AM | #102 | |
They call me EC
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: central Florida
Posts: 6,208
|
Quote:
Now back to your regularly scheduled programing. |
|
11/11/2009, 08:18 AM | #103 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Puerto Rico
Posts: 1,278
|
Quote:
How will you feed the pods, worms and such microfauna that make the sandbed work in the first place? Might as well do what you're proposing and lay down a SSB just for decorative purposes much like LOJ was trying to show, not a DSB.
__________________
"If the facts don't fit the theory, change the facts." A.E. Current Tank Info: 75 G BB tank |
|
11/11/2009, 10:15 AM | #104 |
Recovering Detritophobe
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Cary, NC
Posts: 7,443
|
What do those detritus eaters do to make the dsb "work"? Bacteria denitrify, not pods/worms.
__________________
If it's worth doing, it's worth doing right. I remember when zoanthids were called things like "green" and "orange" and not "reverse gorilla nipple." Current Tank Info: 180g reef with all the bells and whistles |
11/11/2009, 11:31 AM | #105 | |||
Marquis de Carabas
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Evansville, IN
Posts: 2,523
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Jeremy Brown liquor never hurt anybody “Je n'ai pas besoin de cette hypothèse" Pierre-Simon Laplace I should want to cook him a simple meal, but I shouldn't want to cut into him, to tear the flesh, to wear the flesh, to be born unto new worlds where his flesh becomes my key. Current Tank Info: broken and dry |
|||
11/11/2009, 11:40 AM | #106 | ||
Registered Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Puerto Rico
Posts: 1,278
|
Quote:
Quote:
DSB's are nothing but a biowaste sink that will eventually (short/long term) fill out there's no way around it.. unless nothing settles there to begin with.
__________________
"If the facts don't fit the theory, change the facts." A.E. Current Tank Info: 75 G BB tank |
||
11/11/2009, 12:34 PM | #107 | |||
They call me EC
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: central Florida
Posts: 6,208
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
11/11/2009, 01:43 PM | #108 | |
Marquis de Carabas
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Evansville, IN
Posts: 2,523
|
Quote:
__________________
Jeremy Brown liquor never hurt anybody “Je n'ai pas besoin de cette hypothèse" Pierre-Simon Laplace I should want to cook him a simple meal, but I shouldn't want to cut into him, to tear the flesh, to wear the flesh, to be born unto new worlds where his flesh becomes my key. Current Tank Info: broken and dry |
|
11/12/2009, 04:14 PM | #109 |
Premium Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Long Island NY
Posts: 15,549
|
I disagree with everyone about everything.
OK not really, I just wanted to read this thread and I figured after all that reading I would say something. OK never mind.
__________________
I used to get shocked when I put my hand in my tank. Then the electric eel went dead. Current Tank Info: 100 gal reef set up in 1971 |
11/12/2009, 05:34 PM | #110 |
They call me EC
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: central Florida
Posts: 6,208
|
|
11/14/2009, 04:58 PM | #111 |
Moved On
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Stockton, CA
Posts: 14,854
|
Check out the muck. Perfect!
Last edited by cloak; 11/14/2009 at 05:08 PM. |
11/15/2009, 06:41 AM | #112 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: South Euclid, OH
Posts: 4,281
|
Shimek "no touch" DSB's work as--
1. Nitrate reducer 2. Home for sand dwellling creatures/fish 3. Looks- make the tank look natural compared to the BB look That's all they offer in my opinion. There are many ways to meet the 3 needs above. The question is do you want to deal with a DSB's shortcomings for this, or find a myriad of other ways to fill those needs without a "no touch" DSB? They make it harder to reduce or control PO4 & that's where the biggest problem lies. If you don't vacum the bed, or have high flow to get the junk out before the bed takes it in, PO4 becomes an ever rising problem. Something has to be done.........macro algae, PO4 removers, vodka/skimmers are fighting with the DSB for control of that PO4 producing waste. If the DSB wins you get algae/cyno problems in the display, some species of corals suffer, & the tank looks ugly. Imo, pods/worms/critters are useless from a filtering standpoint..........they are just more bioload. If you don't have a lot of waste the critter population will be low. Lots of waste=lot of critters. These critters are below & at the surface of the sandbed. They poop & the DSB sequesters that poop. If the critters get the decaying food/waste before the flow can pull it out you're screwed from a PO4 perspective. The dentrfying bacteria degases the nitrate, but there is no bacteria in the bed to get rid of the phosphate producing waste........ it stays there......gravity sucks. I have no desire to argue or defend my points. Just offering my perspective based from personal experience, logical thinking, & what scientific facts I can understand.
__________________
80g Rimless Acropora System reefcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?t=2197142&page=31 Ed Last edited by Big E; 11/15/2009 at 06:48 AM. |
11/15/2009, 08:45 AM | #113 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 1,515
|
So how deep should a sand bed be if you want to have a home for worms and nassarius snails and microbes that support a healthy pod population? I would think something in the order of 2 inches. Is 3 inches too deep. Thats what I have now. I could siphon some sand out, I'm thinking about it.
__________________
Exodus 8:2 Check my homepage for tank pics and details. Current Tank Info: 90 gallon, 2x maxspect R420R LED, 4 Ocellaris Clowns, Yellow Eye Kole Tang, Flame Angel, Foxface Rabbitfish, Banggai Cardinals, Azure Damsel, rock flower anemone, cleaner shrimp, serpent star |
11/15/2009, 10:13 AM | #114 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,356
|
It's like a lot of these new drugs coming out lately. Sure there are a few benefits but the side effects can be worse than the original problem. LOL
|
11/15/2009, 03:20 PM | #115 | ||
Registered Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Plano, TX.
Posts: 109
|
I think both, the pro and anti DSB camps have some valid points. Some practical and some theoretical.
Quote:
I think in practice a lot of folks don't see the entire cycle--something gets broken along the way and some (most?) of the N+P+C, gets locked up in the sediment and remains there until the DSB gets disturbed--vacuuming, powerhead mishap, whatever. That broken "something", is likely insufficient infauna--be it bacteria or bugs, or whatever. To me, the fundamental problem with DSB's is really in the practical definition of what they are. And by "practical" I mean "easy for the average reefer to understand and replicate". So a lot of people have tried them, watched them fail for unknown or presumed reasons and just written them off. Fine. There's a lot to be said for practical reefkeeping. But that doesn't mean the idea isn't a good one and can't be made to work well, because the reality is a fair number of people have made the work very well. Quote:
|
||
|
|