![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Ridgefield, WA
Posts: 81
|
Filter sock, yea or nay
Hello. I have been seeing some conflicting mesages about the use of filter socks. My tank is a 120g Envision acrylic with what I estimate is a 40g sump. There is a single overflow from the DT, first compartment has the skimmer and a pump for the GAC and GFO reactors. The second is a refugium with live sand, rock and two types of macro algae. The last compartment is more rock and the return pump.
Now my question is, should I or should I not be using a filter sock? I currently am. I change it whenever the flow slows down, or it overflows. This is about every five days. I wouldn't mind NOT using a sock, because it seems like that would be more beneficial to the refugium. On the other hand, I wonder about trapping too much 'stuff' in the refuge. I would appreciate reading your opinions. ![]() Thanks. Gene ![]() Last edited by Griffer; 02/13/2010 at 03:54 PM. Reason: Fix syntax boo boo. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: council bluffs iowa
Posts: 1,530
|
the filter sock just takes out the "chuncks" and "floaties", it doesnt take the nitrates out of the water that things in the refugium are eating up, isnt that the reason for the refugium in the first place is removing nitrates???
__________________
120g custom acrylic, dart return, dart closed loop, 2-evo-1400's, RKE, xtreme 200, 80g sump/fuge, 240lbs rock, ssb, 2-250w mh, 2x54 t5, ato Current Tank Info: 120gallon 2-darts, 2-evo 1400's...piles of flow.. RKE with an easy button |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Cedar Falls, IA
Posts: 599
|
Those chunks will break down and contribute to the nitrates. By capturing them they can be easily removed. The key is to clean the sock regularly.
Some folks go without the sock, but vacuum their sump when they do water changes. No matter how you do it, the more detritus you can get out of your system the better. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
One reef to rule them all
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Leominster, MA
Posts: 5,299
|
The only complaint I have ever heard about filter socks is that they do have the tendency to become a nitrate factory and clog up if they are not cleaned properly. If you are fine with the upkeep, which it sounds like you are, and you don't feel you are polishing your water TOO much and starving your livestock I would say keep running it.
__________________
"A dog is the only thing on earth that loves you more than you love yourself" ~ Josh Billings Visit My Home page for current build thread (click my user name and select "Visit LordoftheReef's Homepage" in the drop down menu! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: chicago
Posts: 1,843
|
^^only if u over feed will the cause nitrates and even then it not the bags fault, its only catching the crud u throw in the tank, bags do not filter out food for the corals, only 100m or larger debris^^
i love my bags, i wouldnt run a tank w/o them |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Moved On
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Stockton, CA
Posts: 14,854
|
Pods in general, refuge>>>DT>>>overflow>>>filter sock>>>laundry. No thanks. I'd much rather have things circulate throughout the system until it's time to pull them out. A few hours after I've stirred everything up in the sump/DT seems to do the trick for me.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Ridgefield, WA
Posts: 81
|
Thanks for the replies. I would like to see a poll for who does/doesn't use socks. Anyone ever seen a poll on this?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Leander, Texas
Posts: 61
|
I much prefer the advantages, to the disadvantages.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Algonquin, IL
Posts: 809
|
I don't use them. I never clean my sump or refugium either. Nitrates stay around .1-.2 ppm with a heavy fish load and heavy feeding. My fuge is full of chaeto. Not all tank water flows through there but the chaeto is full of bristle worms and pods that break down everything that ends up in there.
Here is a thread with a poll on filter socks. http://www.reefcentral.com/forums/sh...ighlight=socks
__________________
72 gal bowfront mixed reef. Tank born 10/14/2007 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
20 Years and Over
Join Date: Feb 2000
Posts: 3,052
|
It's hard enough keeping carbon and other medias from becoming nitrate machines. Once I got into better skimmers and kept hitting my systems with ozone, particulate and staining is a non-issue. Socks just seem like a another thing to clean and maintain.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: California
Posts: 3,031
|
Quote:
I used filter socks for a few months before deciding they are not worth the effort. I have been much happier with my system since removing them.
__________________
-Eric Sutter Current Tank Info: 14g Biocube |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Registered Member
![]() Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,804
|
ludnix has it exactly right.
__________________
On a break |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Katy, TX
Posts: 108
|
I also agree, they are alot of hassle.
__________________
57 Illuminata Current Tank Info: 57 Illuminata |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 | |
Team RC Member
![]() Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 41,560
|
Quote:
__________________
over 24 years experience with multiple types of marine aquarium systems *see Upstate Reef Society Forum on RC and FB* GOOGLE JUNIOR'S REEF Current Tank Info: 84x24x30 265g reef past TOTM honors |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Ridgefield, WA
Posts: 81
|
Gary, at one time I had my tank in my profile signature. Don't know what happened to that. Anyway, I have:
120g Envision acrylic 48x24x24, one overflow, return split w/SQWD device 40g sump (just guessing) with refuge in center compartment ~160lbs live rock, sand bed PM Kalkwasser stirrer BRS RO/DI unit, 6-stage "Deluxe" BRS GFO/GAC dual canister reactor Odyssea dual 250w MH, four 54w actinic T5 HO, 12 moonlights Two 300w titanium heaters for redundancy/backup 50g barrel in garage gravity feeds ATO system All ATO is Kalkwasser unless pH is over 8.35, then pure RO/DI Neptune APEX controls all of this Yellow tang D. Sailfin Tang Two red and one purple firefish Beng. cardinal Two Nemos Lawnmower blenny Royal gramma 10 blue/green chromis 3 anthias (forgot which kind) Randall's goby 2 GBTAs (started with one) 4 RBTAs (started with one) BTAs are on a rock separate from the rest Open brain (deflated last 4 days?) One unidentifed LPS (see LPS id please area) Pipe organ Assorted Monti caps Many assorted softies, like zoas Kenya trees zenias GSP Fire shrimp Cleaner shrimp 3 or 4 peppermint shrimp 2 pistol shrimp Arrow crab (usually has a bristle worm in one claw for munchies) Tile (or marble ?) star Sand sifter star coco worm lots of stuff just appears, feathers, sponges, something that looks like a barnacle About 50-member CUC Tank.jpg Last edited by Griffer; 02/14/2010 at 02:01 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 249
|
I do not use them.
Nitrates test at zero and I really like the way my tank looks. Off topic, Why would the poll be closed? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
Team RC Member
![]() Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 41,560
|
no skimmer, Gene?
__________________
over 24 years experience with multiple types of marine aquarium systems *see Upstate Reef Society Forum on RC and FB* GOOGLE JUNIOR'S REEF Current Tank Info: 84x24x30 265g reef past TOTM honors |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 2,979
|
They really are only a pain to deal with when you do not have enough of them. I have 26 which I change 2 every other day and therefore gets me through about a month without having to clean them. Every other day I change them, turn the dirty ones inside out, and put the dirty socks in a garbage bag where they are stored until washed. The process takes about 5 minutes. Once per month I clean all of them in one heavy duty cycle with bleach. Aside from being yet another surprisingly effective method to export crud, they really make my water look more polished. I definitely notice less water clairity without them. I buy them in bulk real cheap so they are not very expensive either. To me, definitely worthwhile.
Last edited by Stuart60611; 02/14/2010 at 08:53 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: syracuse
Posts: 7,003
|
they are a pain but i do use them ,change every three days on three different systems .i clean a dozen every week ,thats the big pain as i always clean the washing maching first . i am looking for a cheap used unit as we speak just for my socks.
__________________
This hobby certainly can put you in some weird positions ! Dave Current Tank Info: 40 freshwater,25saltwater 2000 gallons ,enough tanks for an army ? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Ridgefield, WA
Posts: 81
|
Yes Gary I have a Bubble Max 2500 skimmer. I haven't seen these mentioned very often but they are made here locally in Vancouver Washington by a plastics company. So I've been told anyway. It works good anyway.
Gene |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#21 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 4,140
|
Quote:
![]() FWIW, I pulled my sock out tonight and don't plan on putting it back in. My skimmer performs better without it and constant washing is a PITA!
__________________
"...the sea, once it casts its spell, holds one in its net of wonders forever" -Jacques Cousteau |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Central MI
Posts: 83
|
I gave up on them a long time ago too - too much work with too little return.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 |
El Conquistidor
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 1,057
|
+1 on the Nay vote. Too much of a PITA. No water quality problems so far...
__________________
I've made a small fortune in Reefing! I just started out with a large fortune and the rest came easily. Want a Cleaner Wrasse? Consider a shower! ;-) Current Tank Info: 60 Cube! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 |
Team RC Member
![]() Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 41,560
|
based on what you've described in this thread, Gene, you might be better off not running a mechanical filter. If you choose to run a mechanical filter I would think that 200 micron would be your best choice. JMO.
FWIW I run a "SPS type" aquarium and I run a 10 micron filter 24/7 along with a great skimmer and I have no shortage of pods etc. etc.
__________________
over 24 years experience with multiple types of marine aquarium systems *see Upstate Reef Society Forum on RC and FB* GOOGLE JUNIOR'S REEF Current Tank Info: 84x24x30 265g reef past TOTM honors |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|