|
09/26/2010, 06:22 PM | #26 | |
Reef Ninja
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 4,280
|
Quote:
|
|
09/26/2010, 06:26 PM | #27 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Albany, Oregon
Posts: 1,117
|
Quote:
__________________
This really isn't rocket science - it's more like marine biology. Current tank info: 180 gallon AGA, 40 gallon custom sump, AquaC EV240 skimmer, PM calc reactor, 3x 250w DIY MH, PCI CL-650 Chiller, 2x Koralia 4's, 2x Koralia 2's |
|
09/26/2010, 06:30 PM | #28 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Albany, Oregon
Posts: 1,117
|
Quote:
__________________
This really isn't rocket science - it's more like marine biology. Current tank info: 180 gallon AGA, 40 gallon custom sump, AquaC EV240 skimmer, PM calc reactor, 3x 250w DIY MH, PCI CL-650 Chiller, 2x Koralia 4's, 2x Koralia 2's |
|
09/26/2010, 08:09 PM | #29 | ||
Registered Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Pekin, Il
Posts: 2,864
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Currently changing, stay tuned for new details... |
||
09/26/2010, 08:45 PM | #30 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Carol Stream, IL
Posts: 23,162
|
First, keep the personal attacks out of this -- if you can't post without calling someone a name -- don't post, not going to say it again.
Second, generic terms cause issues. Not all anemones are exposed at low tide, and not all "carpets" are exposed either, that is a really poor term since the 3 common "carpets" come from different habitats. Lastly, there are really only 2 hosting anemones that naturally split, so again using a general term for cutting them can cause confusion -- heck even use a common name.
__________________
Click my name and then "visit toddrtrex's homepage" for tank pictures Current Tank Info: 210g reef and 65g reef |
09/26/2010, 10:07 PM | #31 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Tuscaloosa, AL
Posts: 1,324
|
Thanks for all the responses, to those that tried to actually help and not just blow hot air. Like I said in the original post, I was hesitant to post on the New to the Hobby board because of this, but I wanted a quick response from people that had actually gone through this during a water change.
The water change worked out fine. The nems stayed nice and slimy while exposed to the air and as soon as the water was back they pretty much stood right back up. I don't know what everybody was bloviating about, though. I said from the get-go that the water change was to replace elements that I can't test for and that were surely depleted. The water wasn't toxic so that wasn't a factor. The cleanliness of the water was the reason I hadn't done a water change in so long. Yes, it is a better practice to do smaller ones more often, and I'm going to try and get back on a more regular schedule for water changes. As for the turf scrubbers, yes, I know all about Santa Monica. It's one dude that goes around on every reef forum and obsessively touts the greatness of ATS to the degree that you have to wonder about his motives. I've been in all of those threads and I kept up with them for months. I designed one perfectly based on all of the research I had done. Once it actually started growing real turf algae, yes, it did a good job of removing nitrates and phosphates. The main problem I have with it is the notion that it replaces a skimmer and a refugium, which is absolute bunk. It basically does the same job as chaeto or another macroalgae will do, except it's hit or miss as to whether you'll actually get turf algae and not just regular algae growing on it. Then there's the harvesting issue. The better you prepare the surface so that the algae will grow on it and not fall off, the harder it is to get it off. And it's a lot more delicate than macro. If you need to unhook it even for a few hours, what do you do with it? You have to keep highly aerated water running over it at all times or it will die. And once it dies, you have to start over again. They're just far more tricky and delicate than macroalgae and they do the same job, although turf algae, once settled in and growing properly, is extremely efficient at removing nutrients. But replacing a skimmer? Please. And this is exactly how that shmuck Santa Monica touts it; one of the threads is actually entitled something like "Mega Nitrate and Phosphate Remover Replaces Skimmer, Refugium." It's laughable. Oh wait, it's not just one thread that's entitled that, it's every thread about it on every single aquarium forum on the internet. Google it for yourself. Last edited by Tuscaquatics; 09/26/2010 at 10:27 PM. |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Sponge exposed to air!? | lines_michael | New to the Hobby | 4 | 02/09/2007 02:05 AM |
how long can sps be exposed to air | whitetiprs | SPS Keepers | 11 | 12/08/2006 06:05 PM |
Can toadstool be exposed to air | dpsa98 | New to the Hobby | 5 | 08/27/2006 04:12 PM |
How long can a Tridacnid Clam be exposed to air? | InsaneClownFish | Tridacnid Clams and other Mollusks | 7 | 07/06/2005 05:05 PM |