Reef Central Online Community

Go Back   Reef Central Online Community > General Interest Forums > Lighting, Filtration & Other Equipment
Blogs FAQ Calendar

Notices

User Tag List

Reply
Thread Tools
Unread 11/11/2011, 02:02 PM   #1
veloboy
Registered Member
 
veloboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Minneapolis MN
Posts: 245
400Watt Radium PFO VS. Galaxy select a watt comparison?

I'm looking at upgrading from current 70 gal to a 180gal. I currently run and love my 400watt Radium fired by a PFO ballast. However, PFO is no longer. I'm considering looking for a used 400 PFO ballast or going to the Galaxy select-a-watt 250/400. I've never seen a tank lit by a 400watt radium fired by the galaxy select a watt. From what I've read it is pretty close to the PFO though. Anyone have any experience comparing the two?

Not looking to get into the bulb/ballast firing debate. Strictly looking at aesthetic comparison between the 400Watt Radium-PFO combo compared with 400W Radium -Galaxy Select a watt.


__________________
Acropora & Montipora

Current Tank Info: 120 gal SPS & 220 gal SPS
veloboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01/11/2012, 05:57 PM   #2
liquidfunk
Premium Member
 
liquidfunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Portland OR
Posts: 891
Was the PFO ballast probe, pulse or HQI ?

the Galaxy would be similar at 400w to a pulse start, and similar at turbo to an HQI. but less blue vs probe start.


__________________
Feed Your Obsession
liquidfunk is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01/12/2012, 10:14 AM   #3
veloboy
Registered Member
 
veloboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Minneapolis MN
Posts: 245
PFO ballast is HQI. Think the difference would be noticeable running one 400W PFO HQI and one 400W Galaxy both firing 400w Radium bulbs on one tank? Its getting tougher to find the PFO 400W ballasts...


__________________
Acropora & Montipora

Current Tank Info: 120 gal SPS & 220 gal SPS
veloboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01/12/2012, 08:06 PM   #4
hedgedrew
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,159
I have them set up both like that. They are close enough.


hedgedrew is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01/12/2012, 09:06 PM   #5
karsseboom
Registered Member
 
karsseboom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 2,183
The 400 Watt radiums should not be run on an hqi ballast since there not an hqi spec bulb. They aren't even really a 400 Watt bulb either more like 360 Watt. So when ran on a hqi or eballast they don't last as long.



Last edited by karsseboom; 01/12/2012 at 09:16 PM.
karsseboom is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01/12/2012, 11:30 PM   #6
Nanook
Ancient Eskimo Legend
 
Nanook's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Saint Louis, MO
Posts: 41,852
Blog Entries: 11
Quote:
Originally Posted by veloboy View Post
I'm looking at upgrading from current 70 gal to a 180gal. I currently run and love my 400watt Radium fired by a PFO ballast. However, PFO is no longer. I'm considering looking for a used 400 PFO ballast or going to the Galaxy select-a-watt 250/400. I've never seen a tank lit by a 400watt radium fired by the galaxy select a watt. From what I've read it is pretty close to the PFO though. Anyone have any experience comparing the two?

Not looking to get into the bulb/ballast firing debate. Strictly looking at aesthetic comparison between the 400Watt Radium-PFO combo compared with 400W Radium -Galaxy Select a watt.
If you still want to "overdrive" the 400 watt Radium for that "kick butt" color and coral growth, you can still buy the PFO equivalent from Hamilton Lighting. They sell the 400 watt HQI ballast, which is the same as the PFO HQI ballast.

If you want to drive the 400 watt Radium to spec, then get an M135 ballast, which of course, Hamilton Lighting sells as well.


__________________
The wind blew, the chit flew, and then they came two by two.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Current Tank Info: 375g Tanganyikan Tank & 470g mixed reef
Nanook is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01/12/2012, 11:33 PM   #7
Nanook
Ancient Eskimo Legend
 
Nanook's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Saint Louis, MO
Posts: 41,852
Blog Entries: 11
Here is the M135 ballast which is the pulse start:

http://www.hamiltontechnology.com/it...I-Ballast-1383


__________________
The wind blew, the chit flew, and then they came two by two.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Current Tank Info: 375g Tanganyikan Tank & 470g mixed reef
Nanook is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01/15/2012, 04:44 PM   #8
amstar
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Dayton Ohio
Posts: 745
What about the lumetek adjustable ballasts?


amstar is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Galaxy Select-A-Watt VS Lumatek Dimmable Ballast yankee26th Lighting, Filtration & Other Equipment 32 12/19/2020 07:36 AM
Lumentek vs galaxy select-a-watt RayRay1983 Lighting, Filtration & Other Equipment 13 05/24/2010 09:26 PM
Galaxy select-a-watt ballast snowcap Lighting, Filtration & Other Equipment 5 05/22/2010 06:48 AM
New Galaxy select a watt Snookchaser Lighting, Filtration & Other Equipment 0 01/20/2010 09:08 AM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:06 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Powered by Searchlight © 2025 Axivo Inc.
Use of this web site is subject to the terms and conditions described in the user agreement.
Reef CentralTM Reef Central, LLC. Copyright ©1999-2022
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.