![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Anemones for life
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Cherry Valley
Posts: 1,386
|
Opinion on RODI unit....
So, im going to be adding to my fish tank collection, and i think its time i get a unit, instead of running to the store with 6 5 gallon jugs anymore..
ive been looking at RO units and want some feedback / opinions on what route i should go with.. im thinking 75GPD.. because ill have about 200-300 total gallons running in my house.. here's the three im looking at though http://www.bulkreefsupply.com/store/...us-system.html or http://www.drsfostersmith.com/produc...m?pcatid=21421 or http://www.airwaterice.com/product/1...TDS-Meter.html any input/opinions? or another decent RODI unit you recommend? FYI.. i have really...reallly....REALLLY bad well water.. so im aware ima be changing filters more often then most people.. but idk if they make super RODI units for people with water like me? haha
__________________
-Robbie the S. Gigantea collector, Restricted myself to 1. -People ive Dealt With- Booyah, Beefy, LeD Bill, Newschool04, Ptr13, LoLGranny Current Tank - 40b Peninsula lighted with AI Hydra 26x2 / 2 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Registered Member
![]() Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Westminster, CO
Posts: 17,289
|
How is your water bad?
I would go with the BRS unit. I have a Typhoon, it has been a good unit but its more expensive for essentially the same thing.
__________________
Hobby Experience: 9200ish gallons, 26 skimmers, and a handful of Kent Scrapers. Current Tank: Vortech Powered 600G SPS Tank w/ 100gal frag tank & 100g Sump. RK2-RK10 Skimmer. ReefAngel. Radium 20k. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: RI
Posts: 1,085
|
+1 for the BRS Plus. A great unit, but don't forget to order a float valve, too.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Sith Lord
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Saint Charles, MO
Posts: 481
|
I am very happy with the Vertex Puratek Deluxe 100 GPD unit
It realistically does around 80-90 per day unless u have water at 77 degrees. It has built in booster pump, automatically back flushes the membrane, and has a built in TDS digital display Plug and play and have loved it |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Anemones for life
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Cherry Valley
Posts: 1,386
|
Quote:
__________________
-Robbie the S. Gigantea collector, Restricted myself to 1. -People ive Dealt With- Booyah, Beefy, LeD Bill, Newschool04, Ptr13, LoLGranny Current Tank - 40b Peninsula lighted with AI Hydra 26x2 / 2 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Registered Member
![]() Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Westminster, CO
Posts: 17,289
|
Get a storage tank for your RO and a sink faucet. Drink RO water from now on. Bottled out of a tap. Can't beat it.
Rusty water isn't so bad, the pre-fliter will get it out. A softener should make the RO work better IIRC.
__________________
Hobby Experience: 9200ish gallons, 26 skimmers, and a handful of Kent Scrapers. Current Tank: Vortech Powered 600G SPS Tank w/ 100gal frag tank & 100g Sump. RK2-RK10 Skimmer. ReefAngel. Radium 20k. Last edited by tkeracer619; 03/18/2012 at 07:23 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
.Registered Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 4,857
|
Quote:
You don't need two carbon stages. Russ |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Coral Addict
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 1,187
|
BRS all the way! I love mine. Comes with All kinds of things to hook it up, tds meter, and pressure gauge. Plus its from bulk reef supply and their customer service is unbeatable! It probably sounds like I work for them but I assure you I don't. I don't even know why you haven't ordered it up yet! Go call them now! Hehe
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 137
|
I know a lot of people that use well water end up getting a boost pump.
I think it's something about the pressure going up and down when the well pump turns on/off and the storage tank empties. Just a thought you might want to consider if you hadn't planned on adding that in to the cost of the RO/DI system. I believe an RO system needs a minimum of 35psi to work at all. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
.Registered Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 4,857
|
If you have anything less than 40 psi you'll likely be unhappy with your system's performance. Your membrane's rejection rate will be low, your DI life will be shortened, and you'll get more waste water than you should.
Russ |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: corpus christi, tx
Posts: 488
|
Quote:
I just got the BRS 6stage Deluxe and it is awesome... combined it with the 150GPD upgrade kit and im making water fast!!! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
.Registered Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 4,857
|
Regarding adding a second membrane plumbed in series:
First - remember that what folks call "waste water" really would be better thought of as "flush water" in that this water serves the important purpose of internally flushing the surface of the semipermeable membrane to keep the membrane from fouling/scaling. When you configure a system with two membranes in series (the waste from the first membrane going to the "in" port on the second membrane), for this discussion let's say it's two 75 gpd membranes, the system behaves like you have a single long (75 gpd x 2) 150 gpd membrane. Now - if you use a proper flow restrictor, that is, one for a 150 gpd membrane, you'll have about a 4:1 waste to product ratio. Sounds familiar, right? If however you don't change the flow restrictor - meaning you keep using the same restrictor you were using when you just had one 75 gpd membrane, then you'll see a waste to product ratio much lower than 4:1. But remember that the recommendation for a ~4:1 ratio comes from the membrane manufacturer. They are telling you that you need about a 4:1 ratio to keep the membrane flushed and keep the membrane from fouling or building up scale. Run the system with a lower ratio and you will foul/scale the membrane(s) quicker than would have otherwise been the case. Instead of adding a second membrane to lower that ratio, you could have just changed out your flow restrictor ($4) instead. A much less expensive approach to get you to the same endpoint in terms of saving on waste water. Now, to confuse things just a bit. Filmtec specs call for the 4 to 1 ratio on the basis of assumptions about the water that will be supplied to the membrane. If you have very soft water you MAY be able to get a decent service life from the membrane running at a ratio lower than 4 to 1 (e.g., 3 to 1). Remember that the waste water from the first membrane is about 25% harder than your tap water. Bottom line: If what you are after is reduced waste water, experiment with a different flow restrictor for $4 instead of messing around with a second membrane plumbed in series. As a side note, you can also lower the ratio by increasing the pressure delivered to the membrane (with a booster pump), because flow restrictors are sized assuming you are providing factory spec conditions (50 psi and 77 degrees for Filmtec membranes). Increase the pressure and you'll drive more water through the membrane and viola - less waste water. But as I mentioned above, if you do this (just like over-restricting a membrane) - the lower the waste to product ratio, the shorter the lifespan on the membrane. Makes sense? Russ |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|