|
09/14/2014, 04:13 AM | #1 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Branford Fl
Posts: 3,024
|
Help Me Decide, Final Skimmer Choices
Have narrowed the choices down to 3 possibilities.
This is for a 30gal display with a 20 gal sump and 10 gal fuge, should be about 40 actual gallons, medium to heavy bioload is planned. In my order of preference, Seaside Aquatics CS3.5 Reef Octopus Classic 110 INT SWC 120 cone What does everyone think?
__________________
I am not a pro so excuse me if I'm wrong. Current Tank Info: 30gal Deep Blue rimless 9/10/2014, 80gal Deep Blue rimless 40gal sump/refugium 9/11/16 LPS reef, 2 x Kessil A160 with a single Maxspect Razor, RO Prime 150INT skimmer, Sicce 3 return pump, Vortech MP40 and MP10 |
09/14/2014, 06:17 AM | #2 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 1,206
|
I don't have experience with those but I am very pleased with my tunze 9004 on a slightly larger volume. My tank is happy too. Set and forget. Quietest skimmmer I have seen. Good luck.
|
09/14/2014, 10:29 AM | #3 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Branford Fl
Posts: 3,024
|
Thanks for the feedback rishma, The Tunze is not one that I have looked at but I'll take a peek and see if it will work with my particular set-up
__________________
I am not a pro so excuse me if I'm wrong. Current Tank Info: 30gal Deep Blue rimless 9/10/2014, 80gal Deep Blue rimless 40gal sump/refugium 9/11/16 LPS reef, 2 x Kessil A160 with a single Maxspect Razor, RO Prime 150INT skimmer, Sicce 3 return pump, Vortech MP40 and MP10 |
09/15/2014, 06:40 PM | #4 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Branford Fl
Posts: 3,024
|
Anyone else?
__________________
I am not a pro so excuse me if I'm wrong. Current Tank Info: 30gal Deep Blue rimless 9/10/2014, 80gal Deep Blue rimless 40gal sump/refugium 9/11/16 LPS reef, 2 x Kessil A160 with a single Maxspect Razor, RO Prime 150INT skimmer, Sicce 3 return pump, Vortech MP40 and MP10 |
09/15/2014, 06:51 PM | #5 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,867
|
Go with AquaMaxx
|
09/15/2014, 07:25 PM | #6 |
Registered Member
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 320
|
Probably overkill. But just setup a vertex omega 130 on a similar setup. Probably overkill
|
09/15/2014, 08:29 PM | #7 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: menifee So cal
Posts: 11,042
|
I am putting a Aqua Maxx ConeS CO-1 on my 40 breeder.
|
09/15/2014, 08:47 PM | #8 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 1,206
|
^nice skimmer, but I would expect a lot of idle time on that volume.
|
09/16/2014, 07:55 AM | #9 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: ATL, GA
Posts: 882
|
Reef Octopus Classic 110 INT. I have the 150 model on my 60g cube and it's amazing! Great pump with low wattage consumption and the bubbles....super tiny! I was quite surprised.
|
09/16/2014, 11:56 AM | #10 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Branford Fl
Posts: 3,024
|
Thanks for the info on the reef octopus! I know the reef octo is a solid skimmer but I've been holding out for info on the seaside aquatics, just seems like a perfect fit for my set-up in both physical size and skimming ability.
The aquamax I'm afraid is a little too large and of course more money which is why it is not one of my choices.
__________________
I am not a pro so excuse me if I'm wrong. Current Tank Info: 30gal Deep Blue rimless 9/10/2014, 80gal Deep Blue rimless 40gal sump/refugium 9/11/16 LPS reef, 2 x Kessil A160 with a single Maxspect Razor, RO Prime 150INT skimmer, Sicce 3 return pump, Vortech MP40 and MP10 |
09/16/2014, 12:19 PM | #11 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: ATL, GA
Posts: 882
|
http://www.saltycritter.com/protein-...in-skimmer.htm
Cheaper than the Octopus. I know the Sicce pumps use to be troublesome...but this is the new one and should do just fine. Personally, I'd go RO on this one, while the sea side seems nice, I always like to over power my skimmers, you never know what tank manufactures "claim" it to be rated at. Now if we're talking about space issue....then that's totally different. I don't think you'll have any issues either way you go....and since they are the same price, it's really going to come down to what you have to work with in your sump. |
09/16/2014, 02:52 PM | #12 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Branford Fl
Posts: 3,024
|
The PSK2500 sicce was a real pita and I have plenty of past experience with them. I swapped out to the newer style sicce (on my old skimmer) and have plenty of confidence in the pump so thats of no real concern when I compare the two. As far as cost the two are close enough that either one is acceptable.
I have to confess that I'm not a fan of overkill on skimmer size either, a little is OK but too much has not worked out well for me in the past. The seaside would be a much better fit physically but I did make my skimmer section in the sump large enough to accomodate the reef octopus. What it is coming down to is if the seaside works as advertised then that is where I will most likely go, just waiting to get some actual feedback from first hand users. If that does not pan out then I'll be going with the reefoctopus.
__________________
I am not a pro so excuse me if I'm wrong. Current Tank Info: 30gal Deep Blue rimless 9/10/2014, 80gal Deep Blue rimless 40gal sump/refugium 9/11/16 LPS reef, 2 x Kessil A160 with a single Maxspect Razor, RO Prime 150INT skimmer, Sicce 3 return pump, Vortech MP40 and MP10 |
09/16/2014, 03:35 PM | #13 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 1,206
|
you have my compliments for not being a big fan of super-sizing your skimmer. Been there, tried it more than once with very expensive skimmers, but I am slow learner.
|
09/16/2014, 05:47 PM | #14 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: menifee So cal
Posts: 11,042
|
Like I always say it is hard to skim a small tank, easy to oversize but it is a waste and problematic.
|
|
|