|
06/15/2016, 06:24 AM | #1 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Northern New Jersey
Posts: 863
|
Is nuisance algae still macro algae?
Aka the stuff we can identify bubble algae and green hair algae? I don't need a microscope to see it. Usually when I hear macro I think stuff I would want to see, but wondering if that is wrong.
http://saltaquarium.about.com/od/alg...microalgae.htm |
06/15/2016, 07:46 AM | #2 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 60
|
Some macro algae are nuisance. I would include bubble, hair algae and some calurepa in this.
|
06/15/2016, 08:07 AM | #3 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 20,050
|
macro/micro do not differentiate between "good" and "bad" just the physical size of the algae.. simple as that..
Just because you don't want to "see" it doesn't mean its not "able to be seen"
__________________
Who me? |
06/15/2016, 08:17 AM | #4 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Northern New Jersey
Posts: 863
|
Quote:
the kid at the LFS is always throwing terms at me cyanobacteria- kind-o or side-no |
|
06/15/2016, 08:51 AM | #5 |
RC Mod
|
Caulerpa is a 'see-able' algae, a 'macro'---but is also a worse pest algae than bubble or even GHA, because there is no way to get it out of your rockwork once it gets hold.
Macro is a Greek word, opposite of 'micro'. 'Micro' means small, 'macro' means large.
__________________
Sk8r Salinity 1.024-6; alkalinity 8.3-9.3 on KH scale; calcium 420; magnesium 1300, temp 78-80, nitrate .2. Ammonia 0. No filters: lps tank. Alk and cal won't rise if mg is low. Current Tank Info: 105g AquaVim wedge, yellow tang, sailfin blenny,royal gramma, ocellaris clown pair, yellow watchman, 100 microceriths, 25 tiny hermits, a 4" conch, 1" nassarius, recovering from 2 year hiatus with daily water change of 10%. |
|
|