|
08/07/2006, 08:55 PM | #1 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: arkansas
Posts: 15
|
Can i get by without a fuge?
75 RR oceanic
24.5x12.5x17.5 oceanic sump 1 Because i'm new to this i didn't think about the space limitations that i would have getting a predesigned sump. Is it possible to have sucess without a fuge? I would like to have one but don't have the room for it inside the sump. I have been told the i could get a hang on one, just need to know because i'm trying to finish my sump and plumbing layout by months end. Thanks for all help |
08/07/2006, 08:57 PM | #2 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Dutchess County, New York
Posts: 1,377
|
Sure, not everyone uses a fuge, but they can be quite helpful.
__________________
Red House=My 90 build. Matt. Current Tank Info: 90 rebuild |
08/07/2006, 09:06 PM | #3 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,464
|
Sure you can get by without it. Mine works way better for nitrate reduction than my Remora skimmer does though. I'd say my skimmer is much less vital than my fuge in my system.
|
08/07/2006, 09:48 PM | #4 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: maryland
Posts: 6,923
|
they are nice to have for sure. Mabe you could design an overhead fuge. You can run without one though.
__________________
I found a way to make a small fortune running a reef tank. Start with a large fortune. Unofficial President of the SEACLONE haters club Current Tank Info: 125 mixed reef 110 lbs LR, 1x250watt XM 20K MH 2x175watt XM 20K MH on Magetics 2X96 watt actinic PC, 220 watt VHO actinic, 30 gallon refugium, closed loop system powered by Sequence Dart MSX 200 skimmer 38 gallon sump, Oceansmotions squirt |
08/07/2006, 10:16 PM | #5 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Lake Forest, CA
Posts: 2,229
|
I'm planning on setting one up myself, but I've gone without one for years. They are not necessary.
They've only recently become really popular. Most hobbyist I knew starting out didn't use one, nor knew what it even was. |
08/07/2006, 10:28 PM | #6 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Valencia (So Cal)
Posts: 757
|
they sure do make things easier! let the natural route take care of the nitrates and phosphates!
__________________
-rich Current Tank Info: 90 Gallon Mixed Reef |
08/07/2006, 11:11 PM | #7 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: aurora CO
Posts: 867
|
im running mine without a fuge and it looks good
|
08/08/2006, 09:31 AM | #8 |
Registered Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Michigan
Posts: 110
|
After setting up a fuge, i would never run a tank without one!
|
08/08/2006, 09:36 AM | #9 |
Premium Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 1,154
|
I'm in the process of setting up a 75g RR just as you are.
My sump will be my fuge. |
08/08/2006, 10:32 AM | #10 |
Premium Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Santa Cruz, CA
Posts: 340
|
I'm with Picard, I was forever battling nutrients and unwanted algae until I started running live refugiums. Whenever I set up a new system now, the very first thing I do is build a sump/fuge combo. However, if you really can't squeeze it in, I would do the following:
- Run two protein skimmers or a *really* oversized one - Use SeaChem's Nitrate Sponge in your sump - Use more live rock in the display Good Luck!
__________________
100 gallon reef tank, 40 gallon sump/fuge combo with RDSB 2x ASM G2 with gate valve mod TLF phos reactor w/Rowaphos, Seachem Nitrate sponge 4x55w 50/50 actinic PC Current USA 0 amm, 0 nitrite, 0 n Current Tank Info: 50 & 100 gallon reef tanks |
|
|