|
08/09/2005, 02:32 PM | #51 |
Premium Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 632
|
why switch if everything is ok?
__________________
Looking for a day job Current Tank Info: 240 Reef |
08/09/2005, 03:01 PM | #52 | |
Moved On
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: about 30 miles North of Sacto. Ca.
Posts: 2,696
|
Quote:
|
|
08/09/2005, 03:11 PM | #53 |
Aka lemmywinks
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Harrisburg, NC
Posts: 8,017
|
So you get algae from oceanic after switching from IO. Sounds like a good example of blaming oceanic. But then you switch back to IO and your corals start to die and it is oceanic's fault?
Did I read that right?
__________________
Beer Snob Current Tank Info: 210 gallon FOWLR (H&S 200a-1260 , panworld 50px-x, 2x Vortech w/ WWD) |
08/09/2005, 03:17 PM | #54 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: bay area, CA
Posts: 398
|
You guys get ripped on salt. I pay 13 bucks for a bag the size of my dogs body. (golden retriever). The bag is about 20~lbs.
You people are getting money sucked out of you
__________________
me: lady you got any live rock? LFS: i only like classical :D Current Tank Info: 54 with porcupine, 10 gallon reef |
08/09/2005, 03:25 PM | #55 | |
Moved On
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: about 30 miles North of Sacto. Ca.
Posts: 2,696
|
Quote:
I used IO for 5+ years with no Algea problems what so ever. 1 month after switching to Oceanic I had a ton of Algea. If I test my RO/DI water and it test good but I test my Oceanic SW and it has higher Phosphate reading who else is too blame???? Not to be rude but I would suggest reading up more before putting words in someones mouth. Like I said it's no ones fault but my own for switching in the first place. Since people seem to think the Salt has nothing to do with perfectly healthy corals dieing 24-48hrs after a WG or having a Algea free Reef for 5+ years then I switch salts and all hell breaks loose, I would love suggestions on what else it could be. |
|
08/10/2005, 09:58 AM | #56 | |
Aka lemmywinks
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Harrisburg, NC
Posts: 8,017
|
Re: UPDATE
I agree that if you had no problems for years and then switch to Oceanic and all of a sudden have problems that the salt is the #1 candidate. My comment was more to this:
Quote:
That's what I was commenting on. BTW, since I use oceanic I've read a lot about people having trouble. FWIW, I've read when switching from Oceanic to IO (or any salt change) you should really go slow. Like do four parts old salt to one part new salt and then do small water changes slowly upping the dosage of new vs. old. This is just a general question for anyone that may be educated on the subject: Why would he suffer coral loss when switching salt? Is it a chemical reaction between the two salts or just the change of salt in general? If it is just a switch in salt does that mean if a LFS uses Oceanic and you have IO the coral will die? Or is it the chemical reaction idea?
__________________
Beer Snob Current Tank Info: 210 gallon FOWLR (H&S 200a-1260 , panworld 50px-x, 2x Vortech w/ WWD) |
|
08/10/2005, 10:18 AM | #57 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Eugene, OR
Posts: 4,262
|
There has to be some other things involved than just the salt. You touch on a good point in that not every LFS or wholesaler uses the same salts. But we do not lose the corals we buy from them even if going from one salt to the next.
__________________
Great spirits often encounter violent opposition from mediocre minds. Current Tank Info: 75gal, 20gal sump, 6-54w T5 TEK |
08/10/2005, 10:50 AM | #58 |
Moved On
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: about 30 miles North of Sacto. Ca.
Posts: 2,696
|
FWIW my feelings are it has to do with the mixture of the different chemicals in the 2 salts. I have talked to a few people that have went from IO to Oceanic and had some coral loss. My main beef with Oceanic is the Algea problem not the Coral loss. I knew the risk involved when I switched back to IO
On a side note I have set up a 30g tank using IO and have placed several Algea Infested Rocks in that tank to see if it will die or if I will have the same problems. This will really help me to make a conclusion in my mind. |
08/10/2005, 10:59 AM | #59 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: North Bay
Posts: 6,613
|
Rob - keep us updated on the progress of your main tank w/ the salt switch. I know it can be a pain with the direction these threads start to go in but I'd really like to know how your main tank is doing in the next month or two, and I hope there are no more losses.
__________________
Jacob. Current Tank Info: Retired from reefing... |
08/10/2005, 11:02 AM | #60 |
Moved On
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: about 30 miles North of Sacto. Ca.
Posts: 2,696
|
I will deff. keep you updated Jacob
Peace |
08/10/2005, 11:08 AM | #61 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Berkeley, CA
Posts: 426
|
impur said:
Quote:
Or maybe some companies aren't being up front w/ us about how long a new batch of ASW needs to sit & stabilize before it can be added to an established tank w/o adverse effects??? I changed to Oceanic from IO a few years ago after the IO became too harsh to add after dissolving completely (plus there was something nasty, white and insoluble in there) . I like Oceanic because I can do a 15-20% water change within 10 minutes of dissolving the salt. If I ever need to do an emergency water change (like when something dies unexpectedly or I spill kalk in the tank after too many martinis) I like to have a salt mix on hand I can use within minutes.
__________________
Cheers, John "Man is certainly stark mad; he cannot make a worm, and yet he will be making gods by dozens." Michel Eyquem, seigneur de Montaigne (1533–1592) Current Tank Info: 40 gal. mixed zoanthid/softie/RBTA/T. derasa reef w/ 20 gal refugium & 20 gal. sump started May 16, 2004. |
|
08/10/2005, 11:37 AM | #62 | |
Premium Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Cumming, GA
Posts: 370
|
Quote:
|
|
08/10/2005, 12:32 PM | #63 |
Aka lemmywinks
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Harrisburg, NC
Posts: 8,017
|
Small golden retriever.
__________________
Beer Snob Current Tank Info: 210 gallon FOWLR (H&S 200a-1260 , panworld 50px-x, 2x Vortech w/ WWD) |
08/10/2005, 12:41 PM | #64 |
Premium Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Cumming, GA
Posts: 370
|
|
08/10/2005, 01:43 PM | #65 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,186
|
pretty sure i can get the 20 lbs bags for lik 9 bucks.. but we are talking about the big five+ gallon pales that make salt for like 160 or 200 gallons.. for 32 bucks for the IO 160 pal.. that works for me.. might wanna re check your salt prices...
__________________
Jarrod MASM president Current Tank Info: 315 reef... with a 900 gallon lagoon. and 100 gallon skimmer :) |
08/10/2005, 01:43 PM | #66 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,186
|
stupid double post......ggggrrrr
__________________
Jarrod MASM president Current Tank Info: 315 reef... with a 900 gallon lagoon. and 100 gallon skimmer :) |
12/26/2006, 10:24 PM | #67 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: cincinnati
Posts: 235
|
Why would he suffer coral loss when switching salt? Is it a chemical reaction between the two salts or just the change of salt in general? If it is just a switch in salt does that mean if a LFS uses Oceanic and you have IO the coral will die?
Or is it the chemical reaction idea? I have been waiting for someone to ask and answer this question. so does anyone have any definitive answer as to why this occures. or is it just user mistakes / coincidence ? |
01/02/2007, 08:18 AM | #68 | |
Aka lemmywinks
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Harrisburg, NC
Posts: 8,017
|
Quote:
I guess that goes to show how little we know about these things.
__________________
Beer Snob Current Tank Info: 210 gallon FOWLR (H&S 200a-1260 , panworld 50px-x, 2x Vortech w/ WWD) |
|
|
|