420nm vs 450nm

jcr6479 · 03/30/2007, 11:32 AM

I'm having technical difficulties here...

Here's my post again:

I am currently running a 250w xm10k se on an icecap ballast. In order to get the best colors from my sps, should I supplement with 420nm (UVL SA) or 450nm (ATI Blue +)? I have already decided to go with t5 as opposed to vho due to space limitations. Any comments would be appreciated.

jcr6479 · 03/30/2007, 03:44 PM

Anyone?

JCTewks · 03/30/2007, 10:48 PM

maybe try asking this question in the T5 Q&A thread...Grim seems to be pretty quick.

McCrary · 03/30/2007, 11:09 PM

I would go with the 420nm, they seem to do a good job on my coral.

03/30/2007, 11:09 PM	#4
McCrary Can't Stop Time Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Tucson, AZ Posts: 3,079	I would go with the 420nm, they seem to do a good job on my coral. __________________ Matt Patience is the best remedy for every trouble. Titus Maccius Plautus (254 BC - 184 BC), Rudens

03/30/2007, 11:32 AM	#1
jcr6479 Registered Member Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Lafayette, LA Posts: 154	I'm having technical difficulties here... Here's my post again: I am currently running a 250w xm10k se on an icecap ballast. In order to get the best colors from my sps, should I supplement with 420nm (UVL SA) or 450nm (ATI Blue +)? I have already decided to go with t5 as opposed to vho due to space limitations. Any comments would be appreciated.

03/30/2007, 03:44 PM	#2
jcr6479 Registered Member Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Lafayette, LA Posts: 154	Anyone?

03/30/2007, 10:48 PM	#3
JCTewks Moved On Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Wilmington, Ohio Posts: 3,040	maybe try asking this question in the T5 Q&A thread...Grim seems to be pretty quick.