Reef Central Online Community

Go Back   Reef Central Online Community > General Interest Forums > Lighting, Filtration & Other Equipment
Blogs FAQ Calendar

Notices

User Tag List

Reply
Thread Tools
Unread 05/21/2007, 07:32 PM   #1
bgiles11
Registered Member
 
bgiles11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 220
Is this overkill, or is it even wise?

Would it be wise to put 2 400 watt 20,000k MH's on a standard 90g? Dimensions are 48lx24hx18w. They have the exact same setup on thier (LFS) 120 gallon. 120g has same dimensions it is just wider. Also would you say that 379.00 for both including everything for the hamilton mhs is a good price?


bgiles11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05/21/2007, 07:38 PM   #2
mg426
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: maryland
Posts: 6,923
2 x 20k 400 watt MH on a 90 ? I would say this would be OK allthough its gonna be mighty intense if you ever try 10ks. Also you are going to use a load of electricity. I think I would go with 250s.


__________________
I found a way to make a small fortune running a reef tank. Start with a large fortune. Unofficial President of the SEACLONE haters club

Current Tank Info: 125 mixed reef 110 lbs LR, 1x250watt XM 20K MH 2x175watt XM 20K MH on Magetics 2X96 watt actinic PC, 220 watt VHO actinic, 30 gallon refugium, closed loop system powered by Sequence Dart MSX 200 skimmer 38 gallon sump, Oceansmotions squirt
mg426 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05/21/2007, 07:41 PM   #3
bgiles11
Registered Member
 
bgiles11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 220
Quote:
Originally posted by mg426
2 x 20k 400 watt MH on a 90 ? I would say this would be OK allthough its gonna be mighty intense if you ever try 10ks. Also you are going to use a load of electricity. I think I would go with 250s.
How much more electricity does MH's use over vho's? Also what is the best type of ballast electronic, magnetic, etc.


bgiles11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05/21/2007, 07:50 PM   #4
BurntOutReefer
Registered Member
 
BurntOutReefer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Granada Hills
Posts: 4,376
If you are already worried about how much more...then IMO...no...its not wise.
go electric ballast...


BurntOutReefer is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05/21/2007, 09:44 PM   #5
bgiles11
Registered Member
 
bgiles11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 220
Quote:
Originally posted by BurntOutReefer
If you are already worried about how much more...then IMO...no...its not wise.
go electric ballast...
I am not worried just curious.


bgiles11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05/22/2007, 07:52 AM   #6
8BALL_99
Registered Member
 
8BALL_99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Toney, AL
Posts: 3,724
I probably wouldn't.. Thats going to be ALOT of heat and use a ton of power. It probably would work fine for a SPS tank.. But most softies probably wouldn't be very happy.

As far as what ballast read through the thread in the top of this forum.. Metal Halide-Bulb and Ballast FAQ Info Here!


__________________
The problem with political jokes is they get elected.

OK, so what's the speed of dark?

Why do we drive on the parkway and park in the driveway?

Isn't is it a bit unnerving that doctors call what they do "practice"?

Current Tank Info: Custom Starfire 300,92Gallon,35 Gallon Hex,Two 40Gallons,125Gallon,
8BALL_99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:39 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Powered by Searchlight © 2025 Axivo Inc.
Use of this web site is subject to the terms and conditions described in the user agreement.
Reef CentralTM Reef Central, LLC. Copyright ©1999-2022
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.