Reef Central Online Community

Go Back   Reef Central Online Community > General Interest Forums > Reef Discussion
Blogs FAQ Calendar

Notices

User Tag List

Reply
Thread Tools
Unread 06/26/2008, 12:13 AM   #1
CyanoMagnet
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Brooklyn ,NY
Posts: 1,272
Poll: How often do you syphon your BB?

I have heard some people syphon their BB every 6-8 months!
How about you?


__________________
Salifert
- - - - - -
Phosphates ud, ud
Nitrates .0xxxppm,
Alk 9dkh
Calcium 445ppm
mag 1380
PH 7.7-8.0
Salinity, 1.026

11/27/2008

Current Tank Info: 72 g bf,15g sump->16g qt,10g refugium w/ DSB and cheato (lots), T5 lighting 6x54watt (2x10k,2xab,blue act,super act),korallin 1501 ca reactor,sulfur denitrator(korallin),bullet 1 skimmer,phosban reactor(running carbon atm),2xtunze1500gph,3xkoralin
CyanoMagnet is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 06/26/2008, 12:38 AM   #2
pledosophy
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Beaverton
Posts: 5,290
Once a week at least.


__________________
120g mixed reef
90g QT
pledosophy is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 06/26/2008, 01:05 AM   #3
Todd March
Premium Member
 
Todd March's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Santa Monica, CA
Posts: 3,684
On my last tank, BB (Faux sand bed actually) I siphoned on every water change. The return blew across the back of the rocks, at the bottom, so that the detritus would collect in the front. On every weekly water change (5 gallons) I would siphon what I could with a 1/2" hose...


__________________
My hobby? I glue animals to rocks...

Current Tank Info: Rimless Starfire 85g SPS (36" x 26" x 21"): ATI Powermodule 10 x 39W, ATB Small Cone, RK2, Vortech MP40W, 6025 Stream modded, MAG 9.5 return, Balling
Todd March is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 06/26/2008, 04:21 AM   #4
victor_c3
Premium Member
 
victor_c3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: New York
Posts: 513
I siphon mine at least once a week when I do a water change.

For the last several months I've been battling hair algae I found that I would manually remove all the algae I could 2-3 times a week. While I had my hands in the tank, I would siphon whatever I could reach (which was usually quite a bit). Now that I'm actually making progress against hair algae, I only get to it about once a week.


victor_c3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 06/26/2008, 05:40 AM   #5
TomRep
Registered Member
 
TomRep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Fleetwood, PA 19522
Posts: 1,219
once per week for me as well


__________________
"I got me a big wave, ride me a big wave, got me a big..WAVE!" Ed Vedder
It's a reef thing, you wouldn't understand!

Current Tank Info: 50 breeder w/o sump mixed reef, sps dominant. NEP T5 fixture with no stock bulbs, Bermuda Rogue HOB skimmer, canister filter, DIY hang on fuge, 2x modded MJ400's, Tunze Osmolator ATO, Randy's 2 part dosed with and Aquamedic twin
TomRep is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 06/26/2008, 06:36 AM   #6
King-Kong
Registered Member
 
King-Kong's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Gainesville, FL
Posts: 2,346
Never.


King-Kong is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 06/26/2008, 07:20 AM   #7
jbeltmann
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: oconomowoc. wi
Posts: 287
KK, would you attribute never siphoning to having a rdsb?


jbeltmann is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 06/26/2008, 07:28 AM   #8
Flatlander
Premium Member
 
Flatlander's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: BC, Canada
Posts: 2,886
Once a week when I do a 5g water change. Or sometimes, even a couple times/week if little piles have collected.

Only takes a min.


__________________
Doug
TOTM April 2001

Current Tank Info: 50g sumpless sps tank..Evergrow 2081 led..Apex control..Tunze 9012 skimmer..Tunze calcium reactor..Tunze kalk reactor..2 rw8,s..1 MP40..1 Hydor Korillia 1200gph..Tunze ATO..all propagated sps frags
Flatlander is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 06/26/2008, 07:30 AM   #9
King-Kong
Registered Member
 
King-Kong's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Gainesville, FL
Posts: 2,346
Quote:
Originally posted by jbeltmann
KK, would you attribute never siphoning to having a rdsb?
No -- the two are mutually exclusive.

I never siphon because there is nothing to siphon.

I have no settled areas of detritus.


King-Kong is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 06/26/2008, 07:47 AM   #10
miniwhinny
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 816
Once a week and inbetween if anything has collected. I LOVE BB.


miniwhinny is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 06/26/2008, 08:24 AM   #11
CyanoMagnet
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Brooklyn ,NY
Posts: 1,272
Quote:
Originally posted by King-Kong
No -- the two are mutually exclusive.

I never siphon because there is nothing to siphon.

I have no settled areas of detritus.
Amazing. How is this possible?


__________________
Salifert
- - - - - -
Phosphates ud, ud
Nitrates .0xxxppm,
Alk 9dkh
Calcium 445ppm
mag 1380
PH 7.7-8.0
Salinity, 1.026

11/27/2008

Current Tank Info: 72 g bf,15g sump->16g qt,10g refugium w/ DSB and cheato (lots), T5 lighting 6x54watt (2x10k,2xab,blue act,super act),korallin 1501 ca reactor,sulfur denitrator(korallin),bullet 1 skimmer,phosban reactor(running carbon atm),2xtunze1500gph,3xkoralin
CyanoMagnet is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 06/26/2008, 08:42 AM   #12
King-Kong
Registered Member
 
King-Kong's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Gainesville, FL
Posts: 2,346
Quote:
Originally posted by CyanoMagnet
Amazing. How is this possible?
You saw the pic of my tank.

It's effective flow relative to the placement of rocks. The best method is to just test many configurations of pump location and rock placement.

Sketching it out wont answer the questions..

You need to see how the flow patterns will interact with the rocks.

If I didnt have a tang I could get away with less flow, too. His turds are really huge and solid, though, and require a lot of flow to keep up in the current until they can get broken up.


King-Kong is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 06/26/2008, 08:42 AM   #13
Tang Salad
Algae skeptic
 
Tang Salad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: 78702
Posts: 3,098
I don't get it. I thought the whole point of BB was that you wouldn't have detritus settling anywhere.

I have a SSB and tons (100X) of flow. No detritus gathers anywhere, so I never need to siphon anything. I'd guess that those who need to siphon their BBs once a week do not have enough flow to take advantage of the BB....just my .02.


__________________
Your algae is not special.

Current Tank Info: TBD ADA 120-P SPS NLPS
Tang Salad is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 06/26/2008, 08:53 AM   #14
silvers
Registered Member
 
silvers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Ga
Posts: 356
I might siphon once eavey 4-6mo I have one very small place I get detritus. I have alot of flow. and I have to agree that if you have to siphon once a week you are not utilizing a BB system eaverything should stay suspended in the water colum until filter socks or skimmer can get it out.


__________________
Lord knows Im weak wont somebody get me off this reef-Sublime

Current Tank Info: 120g
silvers is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 06/26/2008, 10:31 AM   #15
CyanoMagnet
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Brooklyn ,NY
Posts: 1,272
Tang Salad and silvers, thank you for replies.

kingkong attributed his success (in not having to syphon) to having minimal liverock. Could I say you two employ the same method, which is little liverock and strategic flow?

I would love to see some pictures of your pump layouts. I saw king kongs, it was very innovative.


__________________
Salifert
- - - - - -
Phosphates ud, ud
Nitrates .0xxxppm,
Alk 9dkh
Calcium 445ppm
mag 1380
PH 7.7-8.0
Salinity, 1.026

11/27/2008

Current Tank Info: 72 g bf,15g sump->16g qt,10g refugium w/ DSB and cheato (lots), T5 lighting 6x54watt (2x10k,2xab,blue act,super act),korallin 1501 ca reactor,sulfur denitrator(korallin),bullet 1 skimmer,phosban reactor(running carbon atm),2xtunze1500gph,3xkoralin
CyanoMagnet is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 06/26/2008, 04:25 PM   #16
Flatlander
Premium Member
 
Flatlander's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: BC, Canada
Posts: 2,886
C.mon you guys. You cant tell me how much flow any certain tank requires. Of course it depends on rockwork but certain corals cant handle all that flow.

Perhaps some bb aquarists have soft corals or fleshy lps, that can only handle so much. Mines sps but my rock structure, {designed for the fish I keep}, does create some small piles, which are easily handled.

I have a lot of current in mine or at least it appears so to all of my corals. When the correct time, such as when all the frags grow and current is impeded, I will increase it.

Why do a lot of aquarists running bare, require a sand in a bucket type filter to reduce nitrates?


__________________
Doug
TOTM April 2001

Current Tank Info: 50g sumpless sps tank..Evergrow 2081 led..Apex control..Tunze 9012 skimmer..Tunze calcium reactor..Tunze kalk reactor..2 rw8,s..1 MP40..1 Hydor Korillia 1200gph..Tunze ATO..all propagated sps frags
Flatlander is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 06/27/2008, 07:51 PM   #17
CyanoMagnet
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Brooklyn ,NY
Posts: 1,272
I guess I should also ask how often guys with SPS dominated tanks with 1-1 ratio of liverock to gallons siphon their waters.

This realy what it comes down to I guess.


__________________
Salifert
- - - - - -
Phosphates ud, ud
Nitrates .0xxxppm,
Alk 9dkh
Calcium 445ppm
mag 1380
PH 7.7-8.0
Salinity, 1.026

11/27/2008

Current Tank Info: 72 g bf,15g sump->16g qt,10g refugium w/ DSB and cheato (lots), T5 lighting 6x54watt (2x10k,2xab,blue act,super act),korallin 1501 ca reactor,sulfur denitrator(korallin),bullet 1 skimmer,phosban reactor(running carbon atm),2xtunze1500gph,3xkoralin
CyanoMagnet is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 06/28/2008, 08:54 PM   #18
CyanoMagnet
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Brooklyn ,NY
Posts: 1,272
Bump.


__________________
Salifert
- - - - - -
Phosphates ud, ud
Nitrates .0xxxppm,
Alk 9dkh
Calcium 445ppm
mag 1380
PH 7.7-8.0
Salinity, 1.026

11/27/2008

Current Tank Info: 72 g bf,15g sump->16g qt,10g refugium w/ DSB and cheato (lots), T5 lighting 6x54watt (2x10k,2xab,blue act,super act),korallin 1501 ca reactor,sulfur denitrator(korallin),bullet 1 skimmer,phosban reactor(running carbon atm),2xtunze1500gph,3xkoralin
CyanoMagnet is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 06/28/2008, 09:22 PM   #19
FranktheTankTx
Registered Member
 
FranktheTankTx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,306
I'm really looking forward to my BB tank.

I have limo tinted the 2 sides of my 36g corner... and now I'm limo tinting the bottom as well. I wanted a dark tinted bottom glass for BB.

I have 2 - K3's on opposite corners aimed directly at one another with a 300gph return & 100gph HOB refugium... all adding up to 2100 gph flow. Should equal 57x flow for a zoo, clam, & acropora tank.

Once I see the flow in action... I will determine if I want to add a Tunze nanostream 6025 (660gph) in the back corner for flow on the bottom glass. That would increase turnover rate from 57x to 77x. I just want to see how things look with the current set up first.

By the way... I know the tint is a little more expensive, but it looks great! I recommend it!


__________________
Frank the Tank

"What, I thought we were in the trust tree... in the nest? Are we not?"

Current Tank Info: Custom Rimless 60g (30.5"x24.5"x18.5")
FranktheTankTx is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:55 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Powered by Searchlight © 2025 Axivo Inc.
Use of this web site is subject to the terms and conditions described in the user agreement.
Reef CentralTM Reef Central, LLC. Copyright ©1999-2022
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.