![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#826 | |
Moved On
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Ft Worth, Tx
Posts: 43,217
|
Quote:
With your tank only being 24" wide, the minis would be better suited. The large reflector is 20" in diameter, and I'm using them over a tank that is 30" wide. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#827 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Sykesville, MD
Posts: 213
|
I want to try 2 LB minis on my 110G 60x18x24 SPS tank. The big ones seem like a bad idea with a 18inch wide tank.
Will 2 LBs be enough? I currently run 3 250W bulbs using sub par reflectors. |
![]() |
![]() |
#828 | |
Awaiting Email Confirmation
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: On RC
Posts: 3,609
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#829 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Sykesville, MD
Posts: 213
|
what is the expected coverage area for the minis?
|
![]() |
![]() |
#830 | |
Awaiting Email Confirmation
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: On RC
Posts: 3,609
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#831 |
Premium Member
![]() Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Urbandale, IA
Posts: 254
|
here is my set up with 76 length and 37 width and 29 height.
bulbs are about 17 - 18 inches off the surface, and I do not use a chiller. The pictures are very accurate representation of reeflux 12K 400 Watt bulbs on coralvue with large lumenbrights 18 inch off the surface. ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#832 |
Moved On
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Ft Worth, Tx
Posts: 43,217
|
That looks good to me.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#833 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Chelmsford MA
Posts: 16
|
coryjones,
I realy like the look of your pendents and light track. What type of paint did you use? Is it made from PVC? Any problem with the heat on the paint or track? I am thinking about building something similar. Dave
__________________
"Nothing Good Happens Fast In a Reef" Current Tank Info: 120 Display 100 gallons sump - fuge |
![]() |
![]() |
#834 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Kansas
Posts: 335
|
has anyone safely put a moon light of some kind on a 250 watt fixture? I was thinking of buying a moonlight that bends so I could aim it up into the lumen bright. Didn't know if it'd take the heat.
__________________
Valerie 224 gallon acrylic, MP 60, 2 jaebo pumps, w 80 gal. sump, octopus extreme 300 skimmer, uv 25IL, 2 radion, aquatic life 12 bulb T5 fixture Current Tank Info: 224 acrylic, 80 gallon custom sump, Deltec skimmer, lifereef calcium reactor, radions |
![]() |
![]() |
#835 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Maryland
Posts: 252
|
Quote:
Last edited by Fuzznutz; 11/18/2008 at 05:30 AM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#836 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: oc
Posts: 786
|
i have a 36x24x20 tank. do you think one lumenbright large at about 16" above the water will be sufficient?
i was going to go with the 250w |
![]() |
![]() |
#837 |
Moved On
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Ft Worth, Tx
Posts: 43,217
|
18" from the bulb to the water would work.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#838 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Fresno, CA
Posts: 63
|
Any reason to keep the glass lens on the finished pendant? Since the bottom of fixture is so high above water, the amount of salt spray is probably minimal. Right? Also the heat transfer is probably pretty similar with and without lens or maybe not? I guess I hesitate to use lens because it decreases the PAR reaching tank but if it helps decrease heat transfer to water then it may be worth it since my chiller won't run as much.
I'm getting ready to buy 3 LB's and was debating getting the reflector or the finished pendant since it comes with a glass lens. Any input would be greatly appreciated. |
![]() |
![]() |
#839 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Pennsville NJ
Posts: 279
|
Marc (melev) showed that there is very little PAR loss from using the glass.. if you plan on removing the glass might as well get the unfinished.. i would personally keep the glass if it were me.
__________________
-Asking her for Forgiveness is much easier than asking for Permission.- Current Tank Info: 120gal Re-Build |
![]() |
![]() |
#840 |
Registered Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Maryland
Posts: 252
|
![]() ![]() Not the best pic of the moonlights in action, but you can see the spread they throw out. And a few pics of my tank... Reeflux 12k by themselves ![]() Reeflux 12k with 2 Giessmann Actinic+ T5s ![]() For fun...my confused False Perc...loves the Pulsing Xenia! *sigh* tank-raised fish ![]() ![]() Last edited by Fuzznutz; 11/18/2008 at 10:14 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
#841 |
Moved On
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Ft Worth, Tx
Posts: 43,217
|
The reason I bought mine with glass was because I wanted my high dollar reflectors to last a long time and stay clean. The drop in PAR was almost non-existent, so there was no reason to avoid the glass.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#842 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Fresno, CA
Posts: 63
|
Thanks for the input. I think I will go with finished pendants with glass lens since they won't affect PAR and will probably help prevent radiant heat transfer to water column. Now if I can a vendor who has them in stock....
|
![]() |
![]() |
#843 |
Awaiting Email Confirmation
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: On RC
Posts: 3,609
|
Check with Mike at Reef Specialty, He should have them in stock.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#844 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 23
|
Hi guys well, I was going to get a lb large pendant to go over a 30" cube but the supplier in Australia that got them in was given only mini's even though they paid for some large as well.... naughty coralvue.
Anyway The large lb's will not be in until March 09!!! My question is would a mini be good enough for the tank?? 250w the spread be ok? or would it be best to get a 24" cube instead? Cheers Brad |
![]() |
![]() |
#845 |
Moved On
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Ft Worth, Tx
Posts: 43,217
|
I would ask if you can use the smaller one now and trade it in for what you requested when they arrive with no additional cost. Making you wait 4 months is rather unfair.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#846 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Sykesville, MD
Posts: 213
|
quote:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Originally posted by brshriver I want to try 2 LB minis on my 110G 60x18x24 SPS tank. The big ones seem like a bad idea with a 18inch wide tank. Will 2 LBs be enough? I currently run 3 250W bulbs using sub par reflectors. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Quote:
I should put some house plants in front of the tank ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#847 | |
Awaiting Email Confirmation
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: On RC
Posts: 3,609
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#848 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Sykesville, MD
Posts: 213
|
Quote:
I am currently running 3 250W bulbs over the tank and my PAR readings are not that impressive due to two factors: the quality of the reflectors and the matching of bulbs to ballasts (which I am fixing). I was thinking that if I switched to 2 LBs I would actually get better par readings in my tank than I currently do with three bulbs, even if some light is bleeding over the front of the tank. 5ft is just a bad length. Currently my PAR readings with new bulbs drops under 300 just under the surface of the water. Readings are with an Apogee meter that is about 1 year old. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#849 | |
Awaiting Email Confirmation
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: On RC
Posts: 3,609
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#850 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Sykesville, MD
Posts: 213
|
I did not know they were out. Mounting height is not an issue in my case, just the odd dimensions of the tank. 18 wide and 60 long. The 18 wide would indicate a lower mounting height while the 60 wide would indicate 3 bulbs or higher mounting heights.
Do they still get similar PAR readings, just at a lower height? |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|