Reef Central Online Community

Go Back   Reef Central Online Community > General Interest Forums > Lighting, Filtration & Other Equipment
Blogs FAQ Calendar

Notices

User Tag List

Closed Thread
Thread Tools
Unread 12/07/2008, 04:11 PM   #951
BreadmanMike
Moved On
 
BreadmanMike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Illinois
Posts: 4,886
Can I cover 48x48 with two large 400w LB's? I currently cover it now with two 400w L3's.



Last edited by BreadmanMike; 12/07/2008 at 04:50 PM.
BreadmanMike is offline  
Unread 12/08/2008, 10:11 AM   #952
JRaquatics
Awaiting Email Confirmation
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: On RC
Posts: 3,609
Quote:
Originally posted by BreadmanMike
Can I cover 48x48 with two large 400w LB's? I currently cover it now with two 400w L3's.
If it were my tank I would run 4 250w LB wide minis. This would be killer coverage and optimal lighting all around. I bet you it would make a night and day difference compared to your current lighting.


JRaquatics is offline  
Unread 12/08/2008, 05:40 PM   #953
BreadmanMike
Moved On
 
BreadmanMike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Illinois
Posts: 4,886
I don't want to have 5 bulbs to replace. Three is enough.

I don't have anything in the front 8" and some low light stuff along the back. I think we can make two large work.

I'll have to get you over here.


BreadmanMike is offline  
Unread 12/09/2008, 11:49 AM   #954
johnny313
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 649
Quick question... I have 2 LB 250w12k's on a 65g ant the bulbs are at 18" high over tank for about 2 or 3 weeks. do I always keep them the high on the tank or do I drop them down?


johnny313 is offline  
Unread 12/09/2008, 12:36 PM   #955
JRaquatics
Awaiting Email Confirmation
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: On RC
Posts: 3,609
Quote:
Originally posted by johnny313
Quick question... I have 2 LB 250w12k's on a 65g ant the bulbs are at 18" high over tank for about 2 or 3 weeks. do I always keep them the high on the tank or do I drop them down?
You can lower them to about 16 inches slowly and would also lower you photo period. Take things slowly and monitor your inhabitants. Any signs of shock raise the reflectors and allow them more time to adjust to your new lighting.


JRaquatics is offline  
Unread 12/09/2008, 12:40 PM   #956
melev
Moved On
 
melev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Ft Worth, Tx
Posts: 43,217
No, they stay at that height. Perhaps 8 months from now, you could lower them one or two inches to get more life out of the same bulbs, thus keeping the same PAR value. Then when it is time to replace the bulbs, the reflectors are raised back up to their original height.


melev is offline  
Unread 12/09/2008, 01:25 PM   #957
johnny313
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 649
ok thanks but shouldnt I change them every 9 months?


johnny313 is offline  
Unread 12/09/2008, 01:41 PM   #958
melev
Moved On
 
melev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Ft Worth, Tx
Posts: 43,217
With a PAR meter, you'd have that answer. Most people try to use their bulbs about 12 months, I believe. If you are changing them out more frequently, then leaving them at the same height would be your best bet.


melev is offline  
Unread 12/09/2008, 02:14 PM   #959
Pike614
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,303
ok, JR..you've had awesome advise for the Reeflo 250 I've got, now I am thinking a nice xmas present would be a lighting upgrade. I am running 4 x 250W 14k MH's on ARO elect ballasts....over my 450g tank with simple spider reflectors. The tank is 30" deep. I was trying to decide between the Lumnenarc and the LB reflector as I think I'll get better growth from my SPS near the top/mid of the tank. ANy thoughts on the difference between the two?
Thanks!


Pike614 is offline  
Unread 12/09/2008, 02:26 PM   #960
JRaquatics
Awaiting Email Confirmation
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: On RC
Posts: 3,609
Quote:
Originally posted by Pike614
ok, JR..you've had awesome advise for the Reeflo 250 I've got, now I am thinking a nice xmas present would be a lighting upgrade. I am running 4 x 250W 14k MH's on ARO elect ballasts....over my 450g tank with simple spider reflectors. The tank is 30" deep. I was trying to decide between the Lumnenarc and the LB reflector as I think I'll get better growth from my SPS near the top/mid of the tank. ANy thoughts on the difference between the two?
Thanks!
What are the exact dimensions of your 450gal tank? The main difference between the two reflectors is how the disperse the light. The LBs concentrate the light within the bounds of the reflectors spread. The lumen Brights require higher mounting heights (with a benefit of dispersing heat) and does seam to penetrate the water surface better than most reflectors on the market. The Lumen Arc is ideal for maximum spread but does little to confine its light boundaries. Either reflector will be like night and day compared to your spider reflectors.


JRaquatics is offline  
Unread 12/09/2008, 03:01 PM   #961
Pike614
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,303
the tank is 8' x 30" deep, and 36" wide...I had 4 holes put on top, each is 17" x 24". This is an in-wall tank. Seems then like the LB is more of a spot light, good for 2" width tanks?


Pike614 is offline  
Unread 12/09/2008, 04:18 PM   #962
JRaquatics
Awaiting Email Confirmation
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: On RC
Posts: 3,609
4 LB larges would be optimal for your tank. The LB minis are good up to 30" wide tanks and the Largest seem to be good for up to 38"-40" wide tanks.


JRaquatics is offline  
Unread 12/09/2008, 05:15 PM   #963
Pike614
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,303
thanks!


Pike614 is offline  
Unread 12/09/2008, 05:30 PM   #964
Pike614
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,303
just to be clear, even though you said that the Lumenarc 3 was a wider spread, you're saying you'd go with the large LB for my tank at 36" width?


Pike614 is offline  
Unread 12/09/2008, 05:41 PM   #965
nickts40
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Gillette, NJ
Posts: 181
There is no chance in hell that my corals would grow that fast in a year. Still trying to figure out the secret. They grow longer pretty good. Just not branching or fatter.


__________________
Current Tank: 220G , 50G Sump, 3x400 12K Reeflux, Orca 250 skimmer, 4x6100 Tunze, GEO Kalk and 612 Calcium Reactor, ACIII Controller, Chiller
nickts40 is offline  
Unread 12/09/2008, 09:17 PM   #966
JACOXVIII
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: KC MO
Posts: 248
what LB would i use for my 155 bow front
canopy is 18"off the water with a open top
2 250 CV ballast and 2 xm 20k had 12k reeflux and think i will go back but will need sup for a bluer look with the 12k
o ya will be getting a 3rd cv ballast


JACOXVIII is offline  
Unread 12/10/2008, 10:02 AM   #967
JRaquatics
Awaiting Email Confirmation
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: On RC
Posts: 3,609
Quote:
Originally posted by Pike614
just to be clear, even though you said that the Lumenarc 3 was a wider spread, you're saying you'd go with the large LB for my tank at 36" width?
I suggest The LB larges because although the spread isn't as large as the LA the quality of light penetrating the water surface to your inhabitants will be greater. You will get enough spread for your system if the reflectors are hung at recommended heights. I am a big fan of the Lumen brights and find them to be the #1 key to the success of my own reef.


JRaquatics is offline  
Unread 12/10/2008, 10:04 AM   #968
JRaquatics
Awaiting Email Confirmation
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: On RC
Posts: 3,609
Quote:
Originally posted by JACOXVIII
what LB would i use for my 155 bow front
canopy is 18"off the water with a open top
2 250 CV ballast and 2 xm 20k had 12k reeflux and think i will go back but will need sup for a bluer look with the 12k
o ya will be getting a 3rd cv ballast
What are the relative dimensions of your tank?


JRaquatics is offline  
Unread 12/10/2008, 01:46 PM   #969
JACOXVIII
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: KC MO
Posts: 248
i will go see
but the tank at the ends is wide as a stander 150 think 18"
and in the mid it is 24" wide


JACOXVIII is offline  
Unread 12/10/2008, 01:47 PM   #970
BreadmanMike
Moved On
 
BreadmanMike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Illinois
Posts: 4,886
Quote:
Originally posted by JACOXVIII
i will go see
but the tank at the ends is wide as a stander 150 think 18"
and in the mid it is 24" wide
72x24x24 in the middle and 72x18x24 on the ends if it's a AGA 155 bow.


BreadmanMike is offline  
Unread 12/10/2008, 01:52 PM   #971
JRaquatics
Awaiting Email Confirmation
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: On RC
Posts: 3,609
Quote:
Originally posted by JACOXVIII
i will go see
but the tank at the ends is wide as a stander 150 think 18"
and in the mid it is 24" wide
Well I would say your best off with 3 250 LB minis over your tank for optimal lighting.


JRaquatics is offline  
Unread 12/12/2008, 07:05 PM   #972
sgrosenb
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 160
Quick question - I've got a 156g tank which is 60x24x24. Brand new, so it's just starting out (nothing in it - yet!).

I'm getting 3 Lumenbright 3 mini's, and I'd like to know how high above the tank I should hang them, and how far apart I should space them.

I'll be doing mainly SPS, but I'd like to be able to do just about anything else too.

Thanks!

-Scott


sgrosenb is offline  
Unread 12/12/2008, 10:01 PM   #973
melev
Moved On
 
melev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Ft Worth, Tx
Posts: 43,217
Scott, you didn't state the wattage of the bulbs, but 16" is a pretty safe bet from the bulb to the water.

The reflectors should be evenly spaced across that 60", do the center of each one would be at 10", 30" and 50" roughly speaking. Obviously you can tailor that to how it lights your tank best.


melev is offline  
Unread 12/13/2008, 08:42 AM   #974
johnny313
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 649
hey JR...I just noticed the RS sent me 15K bulbs instead of 12K. I looked at the bulbs before they were turned on because as I turn them on one is a different color so i tried to read the bulbs and noticed they have 15K written on them. is 15K ok?


johnny313 is offline  
Unread 12/13/2008, 08:45 AM   #975
gary faulkner
Registered Member
 
gary faulkner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 1,468
Quote:
Originally posted by melev
No, they stay at that height. Perhaps 8 months from now, you could lower them one or two inches to get more life out of the same bulbs, thus keeping the same PAR value. Then when it is time to replace the bulbs, the reflectors are raised back up to their original height.

melev Scott, you didn't state the wattage of the bulbs, but 16" is a pretty safe bet from the bulb to the water.

The reflectors should be evenly spaced across that 60", do the center of each one would be at 10", 30" and 50" roughly speaking. Obviously you can tailor that to how it lights your tank best.


Now I'm really confused. I was going to hang mine today at 18. Guess I will just experiment. 250 refflux 12k X3 over 84x24x30 with 6in sand bed. Both ends will be in the shade as I will place the three together in the middle of the tank.


gary faulkner is offline  
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:24 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Powered by Searchlight © 2025 Axivo Inc.
Use of this web site is subject to the terms and conditions described in the user agreement.
Reef CentralTM Reef Central, LLC. Copyright ©1999-2022
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.