Reef Central Online Community

Go Back   Reef Central Online Community > General Interest Forums > New to the Hobby
Blogs FAQ Calendar

Notices

User Tag List

Reply
Thread Tools
Unread 12/26/2006, 04:18 PM   #1
fatpleco
Registered Member
 
fatpleco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Kitchener, Ont. Canada
Posts: 21
Help with skimmer

hi i have a 17 gal custom tank with a 5.5 gal sump/ fuge at the back. I was concidering a protein skimmer, and i saw a berlin in tank skimmer, my question is should i go ahead and get it or should i aim for a sea clone 100 however those are rated for 100 gal. From what i have read the issue of overskimming is questionable. Some people say that overskimming is likellly to hapen which in turn leads to grave concequences . Could someone clarify this for me thanks in advance


The very fat pleco


__________________
fatpleco

Current Tank Info: i have a 35 gal freshwater tank
fatpleco is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12/26/2006, 04:31 PM   #2
papagimp
COMAS Rocks!
 
papagimp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Oklahoma City, OK
Posts: 8,185
Blog Entries: 2
I've never heard of anyone "overskimming" their tank. For a tank that small, you probably don't "need" one, but it's certainly not going to HURT the tank to have one. I use a Seaclone 150 on my 55g. It's rated for 150 but I wouldn't never use this skimmer on a 150 tank, not enough umph for a tank that large. In fact, most people don't have anyluck using a seaclone, there are some mods for them, but I've always been able to get mine to skim just fine though, it's a very touchy skimmer, you either get it just right or it ain't gunna do nothin'.

Personally, I'd get a small skimmer. If you plan to upgrade in the near future (a year or so) then get a larger skimmer. If you are 100% satisfied with the tank you have and plan to keep it going even if you upgrade to a larger tank later, then I think a Seaclone 100 would do just fine for ya. (No people, I'm not recommending a Seaclone, I'm just saying it will work, despite all the negative comments about them)


__________________
58g Softie & 75g Stoney


Member, Central Oklahoma Marine Aquarium Society

Current Tank Info: 58g Mixed Reef Project - Started June 2011
papagimp is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12/26/2006, 04:37 PM   #3
Andrew
Registered Member
 
Andrew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 13,640
A Tunze 9200 skimmer might be best since it has a small footprint size.


Andrew is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12/26/2006, 04:42 PM   #4
fatpleco
Registered Member
 
fatpleco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Kitchener, Ont. Canada
Posts: 21
Thanks a lot. I guess ill jsut go with the little one for now. Im not planing to go bigger for a while i have to pay off my student loan should be payed off by the time i retire

once again thanks for the speedy reply


__________________
fatpleco

Current Tank Info: i have a 35 gal freshwater tank
fatpleco is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:00 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Powered by Searchlight © 2025 Axivo Inc.
Use of this web site is subject to the terms and conditions described in the user agreement.
Reef CentralTM Reef Central, LLC. Copyright ©1999-2022
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.