Reef Central Online Community

Go Back   Reef Central Online Community > Special Interest Group (SIG) Forums > Nano Reefs
Blogs FAQ Calendar

Notices

View Poll Results: What's in your nano?
Fuge 5 16.13%
Skimmer 5 16.13%
Fuge and Skimmer 21 67.74%
Voters: 31. You may not vote on this poll

User Tag List

Reply
Thread Tools
Unread 01/16/2007, 01:09 PM   #1
sivob
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Right in the middle of where Wisconsin sucks and Indiana blows
Posts: 199
Skimmer, fuge or skimmer and fuge

Fuge, Skimmer or both


I realize that there are many other components/combinations to a filter system but I am interested in these components. So if you have a skimmer with bio-balls please vote skimmer or a fuge with carbon please vote fuge, etc.

Thanks for voting!


sivob is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01/16/2007, 07:37 PM   #2
sivob
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Right in the middle of where Wisconsin sucks and Indiana blows
Posts: 199
Out of 20+ people only 4 use either a skimmer or fuge. Is it really that few??????????


sivob is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01/17/2007, 11:57 AM   #3
sivob
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Right in the middle of where Wisconsin sucks and Indiana blows
Posts: 199
Do the majority of people not modify or add a fuge/skimmer to their system?


sivob is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01/17/2007, 06:40 PM   #4
Doglover_50
Premium Member
 
Doglover_50's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: az
Posts: 1,623
12 gallon nano jbj--macro algae only right in the tank, no fuge, no skimmer, plus carbon in 3rd chamber. 2 small fish
16 gallon bowfront--3 fish. bak pak skimmer (no balls) and aquaclear 30 filter. macro directly in tank, no fuge.


__________________
Back off man, I'm a scientist.
--Ghostbusters

Current Tank Info: on hiatus
Doglover_50 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01/17/2007, 08:53 PM   #5
sivob
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Right in the middle of where Wisconsin sucks and Indiana blows
Posts: 199
what kind of macro do you have in your displays?


sivob is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01/17/2007, 10:18 PM   #6
kaserpick
Keeping it Simple
 
kaserpick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Greenville, NC
Posts: 2,637
If it's a reef setup most wouldn't use bioballs in their skimmers. Running skimmers also depends on what kind of coral you want. You should check out www.garf.org.


__________________
Kasey

Current Tank Info: None
kaserpick is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01/18/2007, 10:35 AM   #7
russ49merc
Registered Member
 
russ49merc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Winchester CA
Posts: 1,052
I prefer a large fuge and small skimmer. I run a aquac ramora on my 120


russ49merc is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01/18/2007, 04:00 PM   #8
ezcompany
Registered Member
 
ezcompany's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 4,640
most people would choose both. if you want to see which one more people like u should take out the option of both.


__________________
Jin
Have a nice day!

Current Tank Info: IM40
ezcompany is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01/18/2007, 05:40 PM   #9
kase
Moved On
 
kase's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: The ROC,NY
Posts: 1,085
5.5 gallon with AC300 w/ fuge mod fill with LR and macro algae

i would would run both, if i had the room too... no bio-balls not in a reef.


kase is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:33 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Powered by Searchlight © 2025 Axivo Inc.
Use of this web site is subject to the terms and conditions described in the user agreement.
Reef CentralTM Reef Central, LLC. Copyright ©1999-2022
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.