|
06/06/2007, 11:56 PM | #1 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: cypress, ca
Posts: 2,445
|
check valve or not to check?
not sure how many people use them, but i have been hearing alot of questionable things about check valves, and here is my question...
if check valves are destined to leak after a few months, why not just put in a siphon break? what are your opinions? i got a check valve, but why put it in if i have to take it out? was thinking about putting a hole in the return very close to the top under the water line, and let it just break siphon when it goes below that line... dart pump with 1.5" piping to the display... i am sure a very small hole will break siphon? let me know all your opinions... |
06/07/2007, 12:03 AM | #2 |
Master of the 16 hour day
|
I use a 1 1/2 inch check valve on my Amp Master along with siphon breaks. The check valve has been in for over a year and has yet to fail, but I don't rely on it 100%.
__________________
Save the Reefs................................................................Save the world! -Ken Current Tank Info: Currently tankless, and loving it! |
06/07/2007, 12:06 AM | #3 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: cypress, ca
Posts: 2,445
|
yea, i guess i can run both, i already bought a clear double union one, so might as well put it in with siphon...
hey kona, how big are your siphon breaks? how many? did you just drill it? tell me more! so interested... |
06/07/2007, 12:13 AM | #4 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Pho 54, SoCal
Posts: 3,066
|
I'm just regurgitating info here based on what I've read... but many have said that check valve eventually fails. So, I've plumbed my system without any check valve, just leave the water in the sump at the level where if main pump goes off, water from main tank won't overflow.
Tank leaks are enough to make me lose a few hairs... this preventive measure is just one less variable to worry about IMO. |
06/07/2007, 12:31 AM | #5 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Inland Empire CA.
Posts: 649
|
A well thought out sump will always hold enough water in case of power outage with out overflowing. I agree with PochiePooh. Fill your sump accordingly. I use a check valve but as backup. My overflow will never flood my sump.
|
06/07/2007, 01:01 AM | #6 |
SCRK
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Bellflower 90706 CA (So Cal)
Posts: 7,720
|
i ran a check valve for 2 years with no cleaning with no problems ever. Now i have a German check valve
__________________
Instead of building a reef in my home i would rather build my home in the reef. Rob aka STR SCRK & SCMAS MEMBER Current Tank Info: Leemar 450g 96L x36W x 30T 3/4 inch Starfire With 70g Sump Vertex 250 Royal Exclusive protein Skimmer Laguna 2900 Return pump 5 Aquaillumination Hydra's LED Modules. 4 Tunze Stream Bubble Magus Doser. Reef Keeper Elite |
06/07/2007, 08:27 AM | #7 | |
Master of the 16 hour day
|
Quote:
__________________
Save the Reefs................................................................Save the world! -Ken Current Tank Info: Currently tankless, and loving it! |
|
06/07/2007, 11:07 AM | #8 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 821
|
Siphon Breaks. The reason the just fill your sump properly method doesn't always work, is because sometimes we have pipes running under the water. Not just at the surface or slightly below.
Check valves also eat a lot of your flow.
__________________
Prior Proper Planning Prevents Poor Performance Current Tank Info: 135G with 60 Sump mostly SPS |
06/07/2007, 11:11 AM | #9 |
Registered Member
|
you have to make sure your siphin break is clean. I have had mine algae up and they no longer work
__________________
Originally posted by yellowslayer13: "I hate that hole" Current Tank Info: SCMAS Member 225 peninsula euroreef RS180 Apex 400W X 3 20k radiums / Spectra mixed SPS |
06/07/2007, 01:02 PM | #10 |
Master of the 16 hour day
|
I think the point here is "don't rely on any one method" to prevent a flood. Murphy has a way of showing you what you forgot to check!
My sump will handle a shut down, but what if one of my returns came loose, what if a siphon hole pluged up, what if my check valve failed, what if.................................. you can only plan so far, but don't rely on just one safety.
__________________
Save the Reefs................................................................Save the world! -Ken Current Tank Info: Currently tankless, and loving it! |
06/07/2007, 01:06 PM | #11 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Pho 54, SoCal
Posts: 3,066
|
my stand sits on a 10'x10' pan that's 2 feet tall. Used to be one of those outdoor pool for kids.
Murphy's got nothing on me. ok I don't really do this. |
06/07/2007, 02:22 PM | #12 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: RB
Posts: 517
|
FWIW, I have a check valve but I also can hold enough in my sump if it fails.
The biggest advantage to me is that the water level in my tank doesn't drop down all the way to the break point (which is actually below the teeth of the overflow) when I turn off the return. Mine has never failed in 5+ years but I do clean it once or twice a year to make sure that it closes. I have had crap build up on the flap so that the seal was not 100%.
__________________
but is a sin to make to die corals for superficialitie of who leads the bathtub. Current Tank Info: 150G LeeMar Starphire |
06/07/2007, 07:14 PM | #13 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: cypress, ca
Posts: 2,445
|
yea, i think i am going to get rid of the check valve... want max flow... i am goign to just keep the capacity in the sump, and also put in a break inside the top... shoudl be okay... goign to work on plumbing this weekend... shoudl be fun...
|
06/07/2007, 07:16 PM | #14 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Pho 54, SoCal
Posts: 3,066
|
don't get high from fumes on purpose.
|
|
|