|
06/12/2007, 07:54 AM | #1 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: snowta usa
Posts: 748
|
Fish only tank,,do i need to worry about alk,dkh,mag,cal?
hi there,,,just wonder if i need to worry about this thing or any of those so i can buy tester for it and study more about it,,i only want fish only tank,,thanks
90g tanks mag350filter ,wet and dry filter ,,tuzne skimmer |
06/12/2007, 08:18 AM | #2 |
Bogus Information Expert
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: SW Ohio
Posts: 16,147
|
You definitely want to control alkalinity as, if it goes out of range, you will also have pH problems. Neither calcium nor magnesium is important to a FO tank as long as you maintain salinity at the proper level.
__________________
"Leading the information hungry reefer down the road to starvation" Tom Current Tank Info: 130 Now out of service and a 29 |
06/12/2007, 08:19 AM | #3 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: snowta usa
Posts: 748
|
my alk now is 5.3 is this too hight? what range is for alk do you know??thanks
|
06/12/2007, 08:35 AM | #4 |
Bogus Information Expert
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: SW Ohio
Posts: 16,147
|
That depends on what units you are talking about. It is a slight bit high if you are using meq/L (range 2-4 meq) but somewhat low if it is dKH (range 7-11dKH).
__________________
"Leading the information hungry reefer down the road to starvation" Tom Current Tank Info: 130 Now out of service and a 29 |
06/12/2007, 09:14 AM | #5 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: novi,MI
Posts: 325
|
just do the test just to make sure i think
|
06/12/2007, 10:29 AM | #6 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: North NJ
Posts: 884
|
alk, dkh, mag, cal are all important and should be maintained at the proper levels even in a FO tank. The good thing is since you won't have corals to deplete those elements very quickly regular water changes should be enough to maintain the proper levels.
|
06/12/2007, 10:46 AM | #7 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 3,805
|
I agree with Waterkeeper ... keep an eye on alk and forget the calc and mag.
|
06/12/2007, 12:21 PM | #8 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: snowta usa
Posts: 748
|
thanks
|
06/13/2007, 12:00 PM | #9 | |
Bogus Information Expert
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: SW Ohio
Posts: 16,147
|
Quote:
I really have no knowledge of low Ca or Mg levels being that important to fish. I'm not saying that they may not be but have never heard of problems associated with incorrect levels. Do you have some info as to why they should be controlled?
__________________
"Leading the information hungry reefer down the road to starvation" Tom Current Tank Info: 130 Now out of service and a 29 |
|
06/13/2007, 12:24 PM | #10 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Lost_in_Michigan
Posts: 1,306
|
Just do weekly water changes and you will be fine for everything but SPS. R
|
06/13/2007, 12:31 PM | #11 |
Team RC Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: STL
Posts: 14,754
|
There's no better time to learn about the relationship between alk, ca, and mag. You say you don't want a reef, but fast forward a few months from now when you are eyeing that first coral in the lfs....
__________________
-Brett 180g Marineland Starfire In-Wall 278 gallon system |
06/13/2007, 09:28 PM | #12 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: North NJ
Posts: 884
|
Fish are very adaptable and can live in sub optimal conditions. I suspect that low Ca & Mg won't kill a fish, but the closer you can keep the parameters of your aquarium to the ocean the better off the inhabitants will be. Most "experts" will agree that your tanks parameters should match as closly as possible NSW. If your looking for references to printed material check out the writings of Borneman, Sprung, Schiemer and Farley to name a few.
|
|
|