Reef Central Online Community

Go Back   Reef Central Online Community > Marine Fish Forums > Anemones & Clownfish
Blogs FAQ Calendar

Notices

User Tag List

Reply
Thread Tools
Unread 07/27/2007, 10:06 PM   #1
hansonfam
Registered Member
 
hansonfam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Airdrie, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 812
Could an nem carry ich?

I want to move one of my lta's to my 90 but i had a fish in there that had ich. So i took the fish out put it in quarintine a 2nd time and left the tank fishless for 2 months. Put the clown back in and low and behold there is ich again on the clown after he had been fine in quarintine for 6 weeks. So obviously something weird is going on here.
I will retreat the clown but I want that nem out of that tank but am worried about putting it in the 90 with my healthy fish.

Opinions?

Thanks
Lisa


hansonfam is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07/27/2007, 11:42 PM   #2
kkyyllee
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: rescue ca
Posts: 963
healthy fish wont get ich, and i dont think that a nem can carry ich either


kkyyllee is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07/28/2007, 12:21 AM   #3
hansonfam
Registered Member
 
hansonfam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Airdrie, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 812
We'll guess that theory doesn't work Thats what i thought to...lol
But apparently after my tank sitting fishless for 2 months and a clown that was treated in a quarintine tank and ich free for 6 weeks. It is back and he is the only fish in the tank. And after some searches on here i guess it can be carried around with corals. So i think i am not going to take the nem out. I will run fishless agin for maybe 3 months this time...


__________________
35 Gallon Solana Gigantea anemone species tank, 90 SPS dominated reef tank!!

Current Tank Info: 90 gallon-Numerous corals,2 purple tangs,choclate mimic tang,yellow wrasse *2.In the 35 gallon 1 purple gig and 1 multi colour gig,pair of mis bar Aussie black clowns and a lawnmower Blennie!
hansonfam is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07/28/2007, 12:27 AM   #4
kkyyllee
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: rescue ca
Posts: 963
i read somthing that the ich will go dormant untill you add a fish and it triggers the parisite again i might be wrong, anyone else hear that?


kkyyllee is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07/28/2007, 01:12 AM   #5
marc price
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: "the birthplace of independence"
Posts: 1,146
lisa, in years past i've had a similar thing happen after a 8 week absence of fish in a FOLR set up. since that time i let it wait 12 weeks. dormant ick aren't likely to survive that long. i quarantine new fish and bought fish which were infested and doomed at the lfs, haven't had a ich outbreak in years. if your lta is left in the fishless system for the full 12 week period you shouldn't have a problem, i didn't when i had to do it with my anemone.


marc price is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07/28/2007, 05:55 AM   #6
rkelman
Registered Member
 
rkelman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Belleville, Ontario Canada
Posts: 3,438
I don't think its the anemone. I would guess the fish had the parasite to begin with and moving it to the other tank stressed it out causing an outbreak.


rkelman is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:44 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Powered by Searchlight © 2025 Axivo Inc.
Use of this web site is subject to the terms and conditions described in the user agreement.
Reef CentralTM Reef Central, LLC. Copyright ©1999-2022
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.