Reef Central Online Community

Go Back   Reef Central Online Community > General Interest Forums > New to the Hobby
Blogs FAQ Calendar

Notices

User Tag List

Reply
Thread Tools
Unread 10/12/2007, 09:09 AM   #1
Speedway_06
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Kent, WA
Posts: 65
Trying to select a skimmer....Need Suggestions

I have been searching for a quality skimmer on a budget and have narrowed it down to a couple of choices but I need some help deciding. The display tank is 90 gallons and I will have a 30 gallon sump. The skimmers I am looking at are the Coralife Superskimmer and the Berlin Turbo Classic. Are either of these going to be good choices and if so which one is better? The skimmer will be in sump. Thanks in advance


Speedway_06 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10/12/2007, 09:22 AM   #2
sherm71tank
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,670
The CSS is a better choice.


sherm71tank is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10/12/2007, 09:25 AM   #3
jsr
Premium Member
 
jsr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Cedar Park, TX
Posts: 409
I went with an Octopus NW200 for my 135G and its working great. Also note that I am only doing FOWLR, no reef.


__________________
Just my grain of salt...

Current Tank Info: 135G Oceanic Mixed, 4 x 140W VHO, Octopus NW200, 3 x Koralia 4's, 30G Sump, 140# Live Rock, 120# Live Sand, ATO
jsr is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10/12/2007, 09:31 AM   #4
Speedway_06
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Kent, WA
Posts: 65
I will be setting this up to be a mixed reef, but I don't have all the cash in the world so I need a quality skimmer for a decent price. I don't want to skimp on it though if that makes any sense.


Speedway_06 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10/12/2007, 09:41 AM   #5
Speedway_06
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Kent, WA
Posts: 65
If I went with the CSS would the 125 be sufficient or should I just go for the 220? Are there any other skimmers I should be looking at that are comparable in price but just as good or better?


Speedway_06 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10/12/2007, 10:05 AM   #6
steri
Registered Member
 
steri's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Aurora, IL.
Posts: 2,361
1st, I think the CSS's are good skimmers. They do need a little tweaking the first couple of weeks, but overall, they are great skimmers.

2nd, between the 125 and 220. For your system, I would get the 220. The 125 is for systems up to 125 gallons. a 90 gallon tank +30 gallon sump would be just barely pushing it's limits. plus, as a general rule of thumb, you want your skimmer to be better then the bare minimum for the tank, in case your bioload ever gets a bit heavy, or you ever have that desire to impulse buy a fish in your tank when your tank is already pretty fully stocked....you know all the stuff us reefers do every now and again

Get the bigger one. That's my opinion. You'll be happy with it. CSS's are a good quality product!


__________________
220g: French Angel, Emperor Angel, Passer Anger, Blue Tang, Yellow Tang, Snowflake Moray Eel, Lunar Wrasse

Current Tank Info: 220 with T5HO lighting. ETSS skimmer.
steri is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10/12/2007, 10:07 AM   #7
jsr
Premium Member
 
jsr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Cedar Park, TX
Posts: 409
IMO, always buy a larger skimmer then you currently need. That way, you dont have to buy another one should your stocking level change. My Octopus was about $200 shipped. I have been running it for a little over a month and it works great. I dont have any first hand experiance with the CSS so I dont know how they perform. I see alot of people on the boards that have the Octopus, modded and not, that love them. I dont want to push in you in any direction but you may want to look at the Octopus as a compairison before you buy any skimmer. Go to octopusskimmer.com to see the modles.


__________________
Just my grain of salt...

Current Tank Info: 135G Oceanic Mixed, 4 x 140W VHO, Octopus NW200, 3 x Koralia 4's, 30G Sump, 140# Live Rock, 120# Live Sand, ATO
jsr is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10/12/2007, 11:12 AM   #8
loosecannon
Registered Member
 
loosecannon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: port kent
Posts: 1,292
Boothe of them stink. jsr is right, go with octopus or asm, at list.


__________________
I like getting WET!

Current Tank Info: 44gal. 40 gal. 75 gal. 30gal. and working on a 75gal. rigt
loosecannon is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10/12/2007, 11:24 AM   #9
USC-fan
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,626
go with Octopus if you can spend $200 AND das if you can afford $300.

The das will be more "plug & play" and also have better performance.


USC-fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:13 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Powered by Searchlight © 2025 Axivo Inc.
Use of this web site is subject to the terms and conditions described in the user agreement.
Reef CentralTM Reef Central, LLC. Copyright ©1999-2022
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.